There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.


All Other Software All Other Software
Search Search
Search for:
Tech Support Guy > > >

Solved: Windows Defender or Lavasoft Ad-Aware?


Saussure's Avatar
Saussure Saussure is offline
Computer Specs
Member with 377 posts.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Experience: Beginner
04-Dec-2008, 01:25 PM #1
Question Solved: Windows Defender or Lavasoft Ad-Aware?
I've got Windows XP Home with SP2, and I've got the free version of Lavasoft Ad-Aware 2007 (haven't updated to 2008 because I've read that it's still rather buggy). I'm not too happy with Ad-Aware 2007. It no longer scans Mozilla Firefox (from version 3 onwards, I think), and neither does 2008, as I've read. I also think it's a somewhat unsteady program. I've got Windows Defender on my Vista laptop and I like it, and I was wondering whether it's worth kicking Ad-Aware off my desktop and replacing it with Windows Defender. Is this a good idea, or should I stick with Ad-Aware 2007?
Soham's Avatar
Soham Soham is offline
Computer Specs
Member with 68 posts.
Join Date: Dec 2008
04-Dec-2008, 01:40 PM #2
according to me.....Windows Defender will provide you much more safety & protection then Ad-Aware againsts Online threats,Hijackers,Vandalism,un-authenticated entries etc etc......"Wishing you a happy-computing environment."
rattlesnake18's Avatar
rattlesnake18 rattlesnake18 is offline
Computer Specs
Member with 26 posts.
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Virginia, USA
Experience: Intermediate
04-Dec-2008, 01:41 PM #3
I think both programs are ok. Spyware programs can be funny at times when one program will miss something and another will pick something up. I say stick with Windows Defender. I would also recommend you try Spybot S&D if you need another free spyware program for your machine.
CapriAnupam's Avatar
CapriAnupam CapriAnupam is offline
Computer Specs
Member with 698 posts.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: India
Experience: Intermediate
04-Dec-2008, 02:37 PM #4
Spybot is relatively older technology now, but still maybe added to the list. Some other good free antispywares are there... like SuperAntispyware, Spyware Doctor Starter Edition, MalwareBytes Antimalware. All these are good.
aka Brett's Avatar
Account Disabled with 16,918 posts.
Join Date: Nov 2008
05-Dec-2008, 12:25 AM #5
Windows defenders tends to slow an xp machine a little,
spybot and xp go good together.
No resources used unless teatimer is checked
adaware was good but now it turns services on in free version but you dont have realtime protection so i dont install it anymore
why do i want it running if i am not getting real time protection
Hughv's Avatar
Computer Specs
Member with 8,450 posts.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Annapolis, MD
Experience: Intermediate
05-Dec-2008, 02:44 AM #6
Defender is real-time and free, so what's not to like?
I also use Spybot with Tea Timer, and the "immunize" feature seems to be a good idea.
Saussure's Avatar
Saussure Saussure is offline
Computer Specs
Member with 377 posts.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Experience: Beginner
05-Dec-2008, 03:18 AM #7
Thanks for all your answers - looks like Windows Defender is a good program. I wasn't sure if it would run smoothly on Windows XP Home - especially on a 5-year-old desktop; on the other hand, my desktop has no problems meeting the minimal system requirements for the installation and running of Windows Defender. Another thing which really annoys me about Ad-Aware 2007 is that it sometimes generates popups in the system tray when I download the latest definition file, advertising its latest products and upgrades. I've read comments by other users who are also annoyed by this feature. The fact that Windows Defender is free AND offers real time protection is very nice indeed Besides Ad-Aware 2007 I've also got Norton AntiVirus 2003 (er, yes, I'm going to install NAV 2008 one of these days, I only get the latest virus definition files but no other updates since the software is rather...elderly...), so I hope those two don't rush at each other's throats.
Saussure's Avatar
Saussure Saussure is offline
Computer Specs
Member with 377 posts.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Experience: Beginner
05-Dec-2008, 04:58 AM #8
Just installed Windows Defender and downloaded the latest definition file and ran a quick scan. Quick time scan MUCH faster than Ad-Aware's quick scan. Ad-Aware's quick scan is about 9 or 10 minutes, while Windows Defender took about 5 minutes. Then, size comparison: nearly 30 MB for Ad-Aware...and only about 5 MB for Windows Defender. Before, Ad-Aware used to be a slim fast program with hardly any hitches. Now it's buggy bloatware. I'll keep it just the same, seeing that two different anti-spyware programs might catch different things sometimes.
As Seen On

BBC, Reader's Digest, PC Magazine, Today Show, Money Magazine

Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question. This site is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations.

If you're not already familiar with forums, watch our Welcome Guide to get started.

Are you having the same problem? We have volunteers ready to answer your question, but first you'll have to join for free. Need help getting started? Check out our Welcome Guide.

Search Tech Support Guy

Find the solution to your
computer problem!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools

You Are Using: Server ID
Trusted Website Back to the Top ↑

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2