Quote:
|
Originally Posted by HumbeOpinion BTW Dugg, when it comes to Deuteronomy you can argue that with the muslims since they fight about it all the time against the Jews since it is there also that God talks about the Jews inheriting the Land. Deuteronomy 11:31, Hashem says, "And you are going to cross the Jordan to enter and inherit the land which the Lord Your God is giving to you. You will interit it and dwell in it." The OT verses from what I understand from my Jewish friends have told me that they were referring to the idolotrous tribes of Canaan and that Deuteronomy is God speaking to his Jewish people. You can talk to a Rabbi and I am sure he will explain that to you.
I am not Jewish Dugg and so I am under the new convenant which is the New Testament, but as a Christian I do understand that my salvation depends on a promise given to the ancestor of the Jews, because the root is the promise of salvation given to Abraham, and as a Christian I do not support the root, but the root supports me. |
The verses I quoted support Genocide on the basis of religion, are you supporting that? Are you saying Genocide and murder is okay if it is in the Bible, but if it is in the Koran then Islam must be satanic. These are verses from your Holy Book, and here are some more
Deuteronomy 17:3-5 "And hath gone and served other gods, and worshipped them, either the sun, or moon, or any of the host of heaven, which I have not commanded; And it be told thee, and thou hast heard of it, and enquired diligently, and, behold, it be true, and the thing certain, that such abomination is wrought in Israel: Then shalt thou bring forth that man or that woman, which have committed that wicked thing, unto thy gates, even that man or that woman, and shalt stone them with stones, till they die."
Exodus 22:20 "He that sacrificeth unto any god, save unto the LORD only, he shall be utterly destroyed."
Leviticus 24:16 "And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him: as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land, when he blasphemeth the name of the Lord, shall be put to death."
Exodus 31:15 "Six days may work be done; but in the seventh is the sabbath of rest, holy to the LORD: whosoever doeth any work in the sabbath day, he shall surely be put to death."
Deuteronomy 13: 6-9 "If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers; Namely, of the gods of the people which are round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth; Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him: But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people."
As for the new covenenant, first the Bible is none to clear on that
Matthew 5:17-20 Don't think that I came to destroy the law or the prophets. I didn't come to destroy, but to fulfill. For most certainly, I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not even one smallest letter or one tiny pen stroke shall in any way pass away from the law, until all things are accomplished. Whoever, therefore, shall break one of these least commandments, and teach others to do so, shall be called least in the Kingdom of Heaven; but whoever shall do and teach them shall be called great in the Kingdom of Heaven. For I tell you that unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, there is no way you will enter into the Kingdom of Heaven.
John 10:35 "Scripture cannot be broken."
So on the basis of these verses, the Laws of the Old Testament should still be followed
Second and more importantly, are you saying that we should not judge the Bible and the Christian religion based purely upon single verses, but should instead consider those verses within the context of the whole Bible and of Christian theology??? Normally, that’s a position I would have some sympathy with, if it wasn’t for the fact that
you have shown the completely opposite attitude when interpreting the Koran. For example, when Jaim pointed out that much of the Koran is peaceful and tolerant and that many Muslims follow this, your answer was
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by HumbeOpinion But Jaim, that was my point! The Koran, if you have read it, then you know that its full of contradiction. In one breath a muslim can say that its against the Koran to kill. But on the other hand they can also its perfectly justified to kill since Allah commands muslims to do so. |
Yet when the Bible contradicts itself, you assume we must take the peaceful verses as operative.
When I pointed out that much of Islamic Theology believes that the Koran has seven layers of meaning, the more metaphorical being the more divine, your reply was
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by HumbeOpinion The Koran is constant contradiction! And by saying its all metaphorical they can use it the way they wish whenever they wish! In fact, I think it was meant to be that way because its a lie. |
So whereas you are quite happy to interpret the Bible in light of later Theology and use it to resolve apparent contradiction, you criticise Islam for doing the same.
When Trigg argued that many of the verses you quote from were written when Islam was at war and were meant for the battlefield, you replied
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by HumbeOpinion On the battlefield you say eh? Hmmm well could you tell me why I didn't see the word battlefield there? The koran teaches to kill the nonbeliever. |
So when you interpret the Koran you insist on looking at verses in isolation from the rest of the Koran and from the context in which they were written, yet when you interpret the Bible you do the exact opposite.
So not only is your method of analyzing Christian Extremism the opposite to the method you apply for analyzing Islamic Extremism, but the method you use to interpret the Bible is the opposite to that which you use to interpret the Koran. Is it any surprise that you reach such opposite conclusions?