There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
acer audio black screen boot bsod computer connection crash css dell display driver drivers email error excel explorer firefox firefox 3 game hard drive internet internet explorer itunes laptop lcd linux malware network networking nvidia outlook outlook 2003 outlook express partition printer problem ram router slow sound trojan usb video virus vista windows windows vista windows xp wireless
Civilized Debate
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > Community > Civilized Debate >
Occam's Razor and the "memo"


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

 
Thread Tools
rikzilla's Avatar
Senior Member with 199 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Experience: Intermediate
17-Sep-2004, 03:52 PM #1
Occam's Razor and the "memo"
Occam once again lays bare the facts:


Quote:
  • To accept CBS's insistence the four documents from the early 1970s are authentic, you would have to believe the following:



    [1] That the late Jerry Killian, Bush's commanding officer, typed the documents--though his wife says "he wasn't a typist."

    [2] That Killian kept the documents in his personal files--though his family says he didn't keep files.

    [3] That the disputed documents reflect his true (negative) feelings about Bush and a contemporaneous official document he wrote lauding Bush did not.

    [4] That he typed the documents on a technically advanced typewriter, an IBM Selectric Composer--though that model has been tested and failed to produce an exact copy of the documents.

    [5] That this advanced typewriter, which would have cost $15,000 or so in today's dollars, was used by the Texas National Guard and that Killian had gained the significant expertise needed to operate it.

    [6] That Killian was under pressure to whitewash Bush's record from a general who had retired 18 months earlier.

    [7] That Killian's superior, Maj. Gen. Bobby Hodges, was right when, sight unseen, he supposedly said the documents were authentic, but wrong when, having actually viewed the documents, he declared them fraudulent.

Now if you can't accept all that, there's another side. To believe the documents are forgeries, you have to believe this:
  • [1] The documents were typed recently using Microsoft Word, which produces documents that are exact copies of the CBS documents.

    [2] There's no number 2. All you have to believe is number 1.



Fake but true!! What a hoot!

-z
linskyjack's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 22,465 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
17-Sep-2004, 04:43 PM #2
Rikzilla---whats the point? Okay, Rather is a plant by the democrats seeking to destroy GWB. Now lets talk about issues---Iraq for instance?
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who help people like you solve computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.



Thread Tools


You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 PM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.