[Mulderator]

Its not enough that Democratic judges in Ohio are letting people vote in counties other then where they are registered (paving the way for fraudulent voting), but they now are trading crack cocaine for votes!

http://www.defiance-county.com/dcso/

NEWS RELEASES
October 18, 2004


The Defiance County Sheriff’s Office arrested Chad Staton, age 22, of Stratton Ave., Defiance, on a charge of False Registration, in Violation of Section 3599.11 of the Ohio Revised Code, a felony of the fifth degree.

The Sheriff’s Office alleges that Staton filled out over 100 voter registration forms that were fictitious. Staton was to be paid for each registration form that he could get citizens to fill out. However, Staton himself filled out the registrations and returned them to the woman who hired him from Toledo, Ohio. Deputies allege that Staton was paid crack cocaine for the falsified registrations.

Defiance Deputies along with Toledo Police Department detectives conducted a search warrant of a residence on Woodland in Toledo, believed to be the home of the woman who hired Staton to solicit voter registration. Officers confiscated drug paraphernalia along with voter registration forms from the home. The occupant of the home, Georgianne Pitts, age 41, advised law enforcement, along with Ohio B.C.I.&I., that she had been recruited by Thaddeus J. Jackson, II, of Cleveland, to obtain voter registrations. Pitts admitted to paying Staton crack cocaine for the registrations in lieu of money.

A business card provided by Pitts indicated that Jackson is the Assistant NVF Ohio Director of the NAACP National Voter Fund.

The initial complaint received by the Sheriff’s Office came from the Defiance County Board of Elections. The Board had received the 100 plus registration forms from the Cuyahoga Board of Elections that had been submitted to the Cuyahoga Board by the NAACP National Voter Fund.


Sheriff David J. Westrick

Before anyone jumps on me as to why I said "Democratic Operatives", the person who orchestrated this sordid affair, Thaddeus J. Jackson is a Democrat:

http://html.newsnet5.com/election200...18-003518.html

Not surprising that crack cocaine addicts vote for Democrats! But I think this illustrates the ends that Democrats will go to steal the election!

[angelize56]

I can almost tell you who will respond negatively to this!

[Gibble]

Originally Posted by angelize56

I can almost tell you who will respond negatively to this!

"You can almost tell?" I thought you were smart enough to know who

[Mulderator]

Originally Posted by angelize56

I can almost tell you who will respond negatively to this!

I'm sure, but they are hypocrites. Here in California, Republicans have tried for years to make it so that people have to show a picture ID to vote (to make sure they are who they say they are) and it has been fought by Democrats. Of course, there is only one reason Democrats oppose it because they know the vast majoriity of fraudulent voting is being done by Democrats and such a measure, while ensuring the integrity of the vote, will harm Democrats! Have they no shame?

[angelize56]

Gibby: Well I didn't want to sound like I know everything! AND I don't want....er....don't need to name names...but you feel free to!

[Infidel_Kastro]

Originally Posted by angelize56

I can almost tell you who will respond negatively to this!

Crack addicts?

[brindle]

He's not online right now. Will be watching this thread for the fireworks.

[angelize56]

Could the Democrats Steal Votes this Time?
By James Pinkerton Fellow
Newsday
August 5, 2004

So what's next to worry about?

Should we fear the next round of terrorist threats or should we fear that Uncle Sam is lying to us about those threats? Or should we save room to worry about less dramatic but more familiar threats, such as vote fraud?

The issue of who counts the votes came into stark relief in Florida four years ago, although it's hard to know if the situation has improved since. Just last week, officials in Miami-Dade County announced that their computer records for the 2002 election had been lost. Then, three days later, they found them.

Touch-screen computerized voting was supposed to be the solution to the problems of mechanical ballots - "hanging chads" and all that. But now the vote-computers, and their makers, are under assault. The new criticism is that the ballot records are as ephemeral as electrons, making it even easier to cheat.

The critics have a point. But one wonder if those critics aren't deliberately pointing in the wrong direction, toward those who are unlikely to cheat this November, away from those who have cheated every year for as long as anyone can remember.

Today, it's a commonplace - because it's so commonly alleged - that the Republicans are out to steal the '04 election. Democrats cite a 2003 letter written by Walden O'Dell, CEO of Diebold, an Ohio-based voting machine manufacturer, as their "smoking gun." O'Dell wrote that his goal was "helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president." That was a dumb thing to say, but it's hard to believe that he could in fact do anything improper to help George W. Bush even if he wanted to.

Why? Because Diebold is a publicly traded company. Shareholders, fearful of anything that would attract litigation or regulation, care more about their money than they do about Bush. And Diebold's 13,000 employees no doubt include some whistleblowers, and outside the company gate legions of reporters and liberal activists are all ears, listening for any tale-telling toot.

So if Diebold is unlikely to commit vote fraud this year, who is? That's easy: the usual suspects. So let's start with Chicago. Few dispute that in 1960 the Chicago Democratic political machine stole enough votes in the Windy City to give John F. Kennedy his 8,858-vote margin - out of nearly 5 million ballots cast statewide - in Illinois.

Legendary columnist Mike Royko - no conservative - detailed how the Democrats did their dirty work. The machine, he wrote, "never misses a chance to steal a certain number of votes and trample all over the election laws. Most of it goes on in the wards where the voters are lower middle class, black, poor white, or on the bottle." In the face of such fraud, Royko continued, "The Democratic judges don't mind, and the Republican election judges are probably Democrats."

Today, of course, the Democrats are up in arms about balloting. John Kerry says he will deploy "SWAT teams" at the polls. In Boston last week, Al Sharpton pledged to protect the "sacred" right to vote against all GOP comers. But is it possible that Democratic anger is part of a diversionary ploy? That is, could Democrats loudly rail against Diebold Republicans, even as their own fellow partisans, angered and emboldened by Florida - confident, in any case, that they will never be convicted by a downtown jury - go about righting the "wrong" of 2000?

One close observer thinks so. The new book by The Wall Street Journal's John Fund is entitled, bluntly, "Stealing Elections." Says Fund, "Exaggerated complaints and fears about electronic voting and disenfranchisement can divert attention from more common voting problems - old-fashioned vote stealing. While electronic voting generates its own concerns, you don't need it to manufacture votes; you can just follow in the footsteps of Boss Tweed, or Lyndon Johnson, or Mayor Richard J. Daley." Those were all Democrats, by the way.

I think Fund is on to something. That's one more thing to worry about, a little or a lot, depending on your perspective.

[angelize56]

Originally Posted by brindle

He's not online right now. Will be watching this thread for the fireworks.

Correction: They're not online!

[Mulderator]

Originally Posted by angelize56

[b]One close observer thinks so. The new book by The Wall Street Journal's John Fund is entitled, bluntly, "Stealing Elections." Says Fund, "Exaggerated complaints and fears about electronic voting and disenfranchisement can divert attention from more common voting problems - old-fashioned vote stealing. While electronic voting generates its own concerns, you don't need it to manufacture votes; you can just follow in the footsteps of Boss Tweed, or Lyndon Johnson, or Mayor Richard J. Daley." Those were all Democrats, by the way.

Exactly my point. Democrats have in the past and will in this election pull every dirty trick in the book to steal the election. The problem is Republicans don't trade votes for crack cocaine!

[FlashyGirl]

By the time the libs here are done spinning, this will be how Bush secretly conspired with aliens, haliburton and local police to steal the vote away from drug addicts.

If that doesn't fly then they will just say the whole thing was a setup to make democrats look bad.

[angelize56]

Amber: And certainly only 30-45% of the crack heads would stoop to such a low!

[FlashyGirl]

[Wino]

Whoa!! They could probably get Bush to vote democratic for some crack!

[DiSaidSo]

Originally Posted by FlashyGirl

By the time the libs here are done spinning, this will be how Bush secretly conspired with aliens, haliburton and local police to steal the vote away from drug addicts.

If that doesn't fly then they will just say the whole thing was a setup to make democrats look bad.

Like maybe....35 to 40% bad?

(I'm sorry, but this is the first post I've seen by you w/o the % joke in it, so I had to ask)