There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
acer audio black screen blue screen boot computer connection crash css dell drive driver drivers email error ethernet excel explorer firefox firefox 3 hard drive internet internet explorer itunes laptop linux malware network networking outlook outlook 2003 outlook express password printer problem problems ram router security slow software sound trojan usb virus vista windows windows vista windows xp wireless
Civilized Debate
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > Community > Civilized Debate >
Rules -- Language (warning ; contains language)


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

 
Thread Tools
XL Guru's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 2,708 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: nr. Cambridge, England.
Experience: there's no substitute for it, apparently
11-Jan-2005, 11:10 AM #1
Exclamation Rules -- Language (warning ; contains language)
Hi everybody. Recently I had the privilege of being asked by a moderator to "come up with a rule (in respect of language) that we can apply fairly". After much consideration, I've reached a conclusion in respect of the word "damn" (I know, it's only one of many, yet every 1000-mile journey starts with a single step), namely that posters should not be pulled up for using it. This conclusion is based on the following:

1. In the first 6 pages of a thread entitled "Damn Rednecks", no-one complained about the use of the word as far as I could see (sorry, 6 pages was all I managed to wade through).

2. No dictionary-type resource I checked classed it as vulgar ; one classed it as "may be considered offensive by some people".

3. Said moderator stated "we (the moderators) decided 'loosely' that the site should be 'PG-13' not 'G' or 'PG'. It's in "Gone with the Wind" (rated G) & "Back to the Future" -- several times (rated PG).

4. Personal belief that the vast majority of non-Americans would have no problem with it. Plus, from an American, "someone that gets insulted by the word is way too uptight or prissy for this place".

Thanks for your time ; any feedback? <d&r>

Rgds,
Andy
__________________
Office 2K Specialist "Master" ; Pacman champion.
Rockn's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 17,888 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Mexico of the North, MN
Experience: Disenfranchised American Male
11-Jan-2005, 11:15 AM #2
So what's the problem? Are we going to go through the same process for every "darn" word someone may find offensive? Kind of a waste of time and effort as you cannot please all people all of the time.
Infidel_Kastro's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 5,384 posts.
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nation of Texas
11-Jan-2005, 11:21 AM #3
We're adults. If someone cannot tolerate the word "damn", then how are they ever going to get the point I'm making.
Seriously, do we need to be policed like this. The filters take out the "prohibited" words, but anything after that, makes me think that perhaps they simply shouldn't be playing in Civ Deb and should go back to the green rolling hills where fluffy bunnies roam in RANDOM.
__________________
Friends bail you out of jail.
Good Friends sit next to you in the cell saying " Dude, that was great!"
Friends help you move.
Good friends help you move bodies.
XL Guru's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 2,708 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: nr. Cambridge, England.
Experience: there's no substitute for it, apparently
11-Jan-2005, 11:24 AM #4
>> Are we going to go through the same process ...

I was asked by a moderator, so I made a start. I can't say how much progress I'll be able to make.

>> you cannot please
>> all people all of the time.

Totally agree, maybe it can be resolved democratically.

Thanks for your feedback.

Rgds,
Andy
__________________
Office 2K Specialist "Master" ; Pacman champion.
moonmist's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 32,862 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
11-Jan-2005, 11:27 AM #5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infidel_Kastro
they simply shouldn't be playing in Civ Deb and should go back to the green rolling hills where fluffy bunnies roam in RANDOM.
.......... .................. ..................
iltos's Avatar
Community Moderator with 13,450 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sierra Madre, CA
Experience: Beginner
11-Jan-2005, 11:28 AM #6
you analysis is great, andy, but methinks unnecessary....i agree with IK....there are times when a word that is pretty widely used....like damn...is an effective tool for making a point

in fact, its use is damn near evangelical, isn't it?
Dude044's Avatar
Senior Member with 790 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bristol UK
Experience: Intermediate
11-Jan-2005, 11:30 AM #7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infidel_Kastro
We're adults. If someone cannot tolerate the word "damn", then how are they ever going to get the point I'm making.
Seriously, do we need to be policed like this. The filters take out the "prohibited" words, but anything after that, makes me think that perhaps they simply shouldn't be playing in Civ Deb and should go back to the green rolling hills where fluffy bunnies roam in RANDOM.
Damn right Ik
XL Guru's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 2,708 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: nr. Cambridge, England.
Experience: there's no substitute for it, apparently
11-Jan-2005, 11:31 AM #8
>> go back to the green rolling hills where fluffy bunnies roam in RANDOM

Interesting comment, a post in RANDOM entitled "y is the avatar so darn small?? was indeed edited. Objectively, I would have to ask, are different rules in operation for different fora?

Thanks for your feedback.

Rgds,
Andy
__________________
Office 2K Specialist "Master" ; Pacman champion.
Infidel_Kastro's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 5,384 posts.
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nation of Texas
11-Jan-2005, 11:42 AM #9
Quote:
Originally Posted by XL Guru
>> go back to the green rolling hills where fluffy bunnies roam in RANDOM

Interesting comment, a post in RANDOM entitled "y is the avatar so darn small?? was indeed edited. Objectively, I would have to ask, are different rules in operation for different fora?

Thanks for your feedback.

Rgds,
Andy
In a nutshell, YES. Different attitudes apply to Civ Deb and Random.
Under random, it says:"Get to know those who make up this community, even if not computer-related.". See conjures up images of roaming hills and the before-mentuioned fluffy bunnies.
Under Civ Deb, it says:"Controversial Topics - Don't enter if you have thin skin!"
This conjures up images of dark, evil, angry, and bitter fluffy bunnies, crawled up in the fetal position after going one on one with me.
__________________
Friends bail you out of jail.
Good Friends sit next to you in the cell saying " Dude, that was great!"
Friends help you move.
Good friends help you move bodies.
Rockn's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 17,888 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Mexico of the North, MN
Experience: Disenfranchised American Male
11-Jan-2005, 11:53 AM #10
you are a better man than I for even taking it on. We have Angel here to police all of the potty mouths as she is here 24/7 anyway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by XL Guru
>> Are we going to go through the same process ...

I was asked by a moderator, so I made a start. I can't say how much progress I'll be able to make.

>> you cannot please
>> all people all of the time.

Totally agree, maybe it can be resolved democratically.

Thanks for your feedback.

Rgds,
Andy
XL Guru's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 2,708 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: nr. Cambridge, England.
Experience: there's no substitute for it, apparently
11-Jan-2005, 12:43 PM #11
>> "Under Civ Deb, it says:"Controversial Topics -
>> Don't enter if you have thin skin!"

Thank you for your point. Possibly it was not clear that my conclusion ("posters should not be pulled up for using it") was meant to apply to all fora, in the context of "the site should be 'PG-13". Some at TSG (NB: not just CivDeb) are not adults, feedback will hopefully establish if the word is "too much" for eg: 13 & over. Then again, I may be on a loser to begin with by posting here, ie: unlikely to get feedback from the "more moral" (NB: not a judgement) as they would avoid entering this forum in the first place. (?)

Rgds,
Andy
__________________
Office 2K Specialist "Master" ; Pacman champion.
linskyjack's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 22,465 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
11-Jan-2005, 12:48 PM #12
Could your next word to analyze be "leftist"-----
XL Guru's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 2,708 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: nr. Cambridge, England.
Experience: there's no substitute for it, apparently
11-Jan-2005, 01:02 PM #13
>> Could your next word to analyze be "leftist"

Thank you. (a) I dont know how long this one will take (b) politicising the exercise might tangentialise it. Do you have a view on the first word, linskyjack?

Rgds,
Andy
bassetman's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 47,094 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Great White North (WI)
Experience: Getting somewhere I hope
11-Jan-2005, 01:31 PM #14
Quote:
Originally Posted by XL Guru
Hi everybody. Recently I had the privilege of being asked by a moderator to "come up with a rule (in respect of language) that we can apply fairly". After much consideration, I've reached a conclusion in respect of the word "damn" (I know, it's only one of many, yet every 1000-mile journey starts with a single step), namely that posters should not be pulled up for using it. This conclusion is based on the following:

1. In the first 6 pages of a thread entitled "Damn Rednecks", no-one complained about the use of the word as far as I could see (sorry, 6 pages was all I managed to wade through).

2. No dictionary-type resource I checked classed it as vulgar ; one classed it as "may be considered offensive by some people".

3. Said moderator stated "we (the moderators) decided 'loosely' that the site should be 'PG-13' not 'G' or 'PG'. It's in "Gone with the Wind" (rated G) & "Back to the Future" -- several times (rated PG).

4. Personal belief that the vast majority of non-Americans would have no problem with it. Plus, from an American, "someone that gets insulted by the word is way too uptight or prissy for this place".

Thanks for your time ; any feedback? <d&r>

Rgds,
Andy
I agree with your conclusion!
poochee's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 51,827 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Experience: Intermediate
11-Jan-2005, 01:46 PM #15
XL Guru, The only time this word would be offensive the me would be if it was used with "God".
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who help people like you solve computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.



Thread Tools


You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 PM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.