Congratulations to AcaCandy on her 100,000th post!
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
acer black screen blue screen boot bsod computer connection crash css dell driver drivers email error ethernet excel explorer firefox firefox 3 game hard drive internet internet explorer itunes laptop linux malware monitor network networking nvidia outlook outlook 2003 outlook 2007 outlook express partition problem router slow software sound trojan usb video virus vista windows windows vista windows xp wireless
Civilized Debate
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > Community > Civilized Debate >
Flat Tax


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

 
Thread Tools
linskyjack's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 22,424 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
15-Apr-2005, 12:22 PM #1
Flat Tax
I'm going to finally give Mulder and Gbrumb(or anyone else for that matter) a chance to comment on something they actually might know something about---the flat tax. Here is a hypothetical. No one pays any income taxes on their first 50,000 earned. From that number on, you pay a straight 17% on the amount above 50,000. There are absolutely no deductions for anything. Now here are the questions:

1. In terms of revenue, would the government collect more or less or is there no way of knowing.
2. How would such a flat tax effect people investing in business.
3. Could a plan like this ever make it through considering the fact that the special interest groups (accountants etc.) would go absolutely nuts.


Now the numbers above, are not mine--I heard some experts on the radio give them. So pipe in and tell me what you think.
bassetman's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 46,987 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Great White North (WI)
Experience: Getting somewhere I hope
15-Apr-2005, 01:06 PM #2
Well, I'm not a Mulder, but the problem I see with a "Flat tax" is there are still going to be fights over "deductions".

For example, a contractor had to but tools to earn the money over $50,000, what tools etc are deductable to bring the total income down to or closer to the 50K? Where does it end?

I just think we'd be back to a new set of complicated IRS rules!
__________________
Bush on 911
What Rice and Powell said about WMDs!
Learn about Human Rights

..."Blessed is the man, who having nothing to say, abstains from giving wordy evidence of the fact."
-George Eliot (1819-1880), author
.
MacFromOK's Avatar
Senior Member with 1,947 posts.
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Oklahoma
Experience: idiota de la aldea
15-Apr-2005, 01:12 PM #3
I can't see this system working for business at all, and here's a simple example:

Suppose a business manufactures and sells 500,000 of products annually.
Suppose their raw materials cost 100,000.
Suppose they pay 6 employees 50,000 each (300,000 total).


You have a business paying tax on 450,000 (450k x 17% = 76,000) when there is only 100,000 profit, leaving 24,000 for the owner. Then there is building/property purchase and upkeep (or rent), utilities, insurance, etc. which is likely far more than that.

Small example, but ya can see the point.

Cheers, Mac
__________________
MacFromOK : PC User
Do I have all the answers?
I don't even have all the questions!

____________________________________________________________

Last edited by MacFromOK : 15-Apr-2005 01:21 PM. Reason: forgot to deduct the first 50k
CouchMaster's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 3,350 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: West Texas
Experience: n00b
15-Apr-2005, 01:12 PM #4
10% of my $10,000/yr leaves me $9,000 to live on - 10% of your 10 million leaves you with 9 million to live on -BULL ***** Zero for me - and 90% for you, now that's fair.
Ciberblade's Avatar
Computer Specs
Community Moderator with 15,703 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Heart of the Bluegrass Ky
Experience: Mostly Harmless
15-Apr-2005, 01:22 PM #5
Well, lets see. In the current system, top 5% pay what? 50% or more of the taxes.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the national median hourly wage is $13.65 or $28,392. So we would know that at the very least the lower 50% of workers will never pay income tax. But they would spend the additional money -- causing an increase in total tax revenue for that wage bracket.

I do not have the numbers for workers earning more than $50,000/yr at my fingertips -- but will search for those later.
__________________
82,268
*AD-Aware*AIDA32*AVG-7*Filemon*Hijack This*PortMon*Process Explorer*TSG Forums menu*

Far righty-tighty Wingnut Libertarian ( ) - annoyingly free thinking with no tendency to agree on anything with anyone. - BF

If you wish...you can now come to church with me! A church that is NOT normal...a church for people who don't like 'church'
bassetman's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 46,987 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Great White North (WI)
Experience: Getting somewhere I hope
15-Apr-2005, 01:38 PM #6
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacFromOK
I can't see this system working for business at all, and here's a simple example:

Suppose a business manufactures and sells 500,000 of products annually.
Suppose their raw materials cost 100,000.
Suppose they pay 6 employees 50,000 each (300,000 total).


You have a business paying tax on 450,000 (450k x 17% = 76,000) when there is only 100,000 profit, leaving 24,000 for the owner. Then there is building/property purchase and upkeep (or rent), utilities, insurance, etc. which is likely far more than that.

Small example, but ya can see the point.

Cheers, Mac
That's the kinda thing I am talking about!
MacFromOK's Avatar
Senior Member with 1,947 posts.
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Oklahoma
Experience: idiota de la aldea
15-Apr-2005, 01:46 PM #7
Lol, you apparently posted while I was writing that Bassetman - wasn't trying to outdo ya on it.

Cheers, Mac
Mulderator's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 49,761 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
15-Apr-2005, 02:22 PM #8
basset and Mac are correct--flat tax doesn't simplify the tax system. The only thing that will is a national sales tax--much easier to administer and much harder to cheat.
Gibble's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 27,137 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Striking or Scoring
Experience: The Alpha and Omega
15-Apr-2005, 02:25 PM #9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulder
basset and Mac are correct--flat tax doesn't simplify the tax system. The only thing that will is a national sales tax--much easier to administer and much harder to cheat.
I just see more smuggling and black market...of course, the IT industry would have a nice new bubble as all the POS apps that don't handle sales tax, and many websites, etc, etc would need modification. Just like the y2k bubble
bassetman's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 46,987 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Great White North (WI)
Experience: Getting somewhere I hope
15-Apr-2005, 02:29 PM #10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulder
basset and Mac are correct--flat tax doesn't simplify the tax system. The only thing that will is a national sales tax--much easier to administer and much harder to cheat.
MacFromOK's Avatar
Senior Member with 1,947 posts.
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Oklahoma
Experience: idiota de la aldea
15-Apr-2005, 02:32 PM #11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulder
basset and Mac are correct--flat tax doesn't simplify the tax system. The only thing that will is a national sales tax--much easier to administer and much harder to cheat.
As frightening as it is to agree with ya - I think that is the closest thing to a fair solution that I know of, especially if food and used items are not taxed.

It's a given that rich folks usually buy more expensive items (cars, houses, clothing, etc.) and therefore would pay more taxes. I'm sure this won't please everyone though - usually nothing does.

Cheers, Mac
__________________
MacFromOK : PC User
Do I have all the answers?
I don't even have all the questions!

____________________________________________________________
LANMaster's Avatar
Community Moderator with 43,526 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central USA
Experience: Need no stinking badges
15-Apr-2005, 02:35 PM #12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulder
basset and Mac are correct--flat tax doesn't simplify the tax system. The only thing that will is a national sales tax--much easier to administer and much harder to cheat.
I posted in the fair tax thread that I supported the flat tax more than the fair tax (which I am assuming is tantamount to the national sales tax) but I am starting to reshape my position on this issue.

I am now less inclined to go for the flat tax and have decided to cozy up more to the fair tax option, though I still think that any time you let lawmakers muck with the tax code, everyone inevitably ends up paying more than they were before, and the overall economy suffers for that.
__________________
I’d rather elect McCain and hope he’s telling the truth than elect Obama and hope to God he’s lying.

Better an imperfect Republican than a perfect socialist.

America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within. -- Josef Stalin

Stalin was correct. Now who wants to undermine patriotism, morality, and spirituality?

No Way, No How, NObama
bassetman's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 46,987 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Great White North (WI)
Experience: Getting somewhere I hope
15-Apr-2005, 02:38 PM #13
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacFromOK
Lol, you apparently posted while I was writing that Bassetman - wasn't trying to outdo ya on it.

Cheers, Mac
I just considered it confirmation!

Hope all is well with you!
Mulderator's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 49,761 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
15-Apr-2005, 02:47 PM #14
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacFromOK
It's a given that rich folks usually buy more expensive items (cars, houses, clothing, etc.) and therefore would pay more taxes. I'm sure this won't please everyone though - usually nothing does.

Cheers, Mac
I always look at things practically. As an accountant, trying to track "income" is very difficult for self-employed people. The tax code is also biased against self-employed people, which is ridiculous when you think of it--they must pay tax for themselves as an employee and as their own employer--how ridiculous is that! So inevitably they cheat out of frustration (you can't really blame them). 15% comes right off the top before they can even make a dime. With a federal sales tax, you don't need the IRS--you don't need a lot of complicated tax preparation.

Also, as pointed out, the rich will still end up paying the lion's share of the taxes because necessities will carry very little tax and luxury items taxes heavily.

However, the single biggest advantage is that is does not act as a discouragement to making more money and working harder! Our current tax code penalizes people like my wife and I--we take 4 steps forward and 3 steps backward--i.e., it just doesn't seem worth it for us to make more money because so much of it gets taxed. In a National Sales Tax System, no one is penalized for working harder. Most rich people will still buy luxury items and most that can't afford them now will still buy them. But people who don't need luxuries and fancy life styles will be rewarded.

It really is a win-win for everyone except tax accountants, the IRS, and repo companies!
__________________
Weapon of Mass Instruction!

Do you like counting dead bodies? If so, you'll LOVE this thread: http://forums.techguy.org/civilized-...ity-chart.html. On the other hand, if you prefer honoring heroes, please visit this thread: http://forums.techguy.org/civilized-...those-who.html
AKA Arizona's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 2,912 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Mississippi South of Mason Dixion
Experience: Computer & Web Design Engineer
15-Apr-2005, 02:53 PM #15
If you buy something is the only time you should have to pay taxes, the current system has us paying taxes when we buy something and when we make money. I would like to keep ALL my money and only pay the taxes when I buy something. Consumable goods such as food should be tax free.
__________________
Deputy Däve C.A.R.NREMT
Certified Accident Reconstructionist
Nationaly Registered EMT

If I helped you please support TSG, just click here Affero Link............................

I've done so much with so little for so long, I can do almost anything with nothing at all............ Deputy Dave

Before you can have an average, you must first have an Extreme, I am working on the Extreme.............Deputy Dave
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who help people like you solve computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.



Thread Tools


You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:05 PM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.