[jedione12]

I used to think the answer to this was Bin Laden, but after reading an article called "The Brain" (playboy's june issue), I switched my opinion to Khalid Shieikh Mohammed. Does anyone else agree with me? This guy was the mastermind behind so many terrorist attacks (incl. 9/11) that it made my head spin. It was also surprising to read that he received his bachelor's degree here in the States, with classmates describing him as a "class clown". Simply crazy, and scary when you think about it.

Thoughts or opinions?

Steve

[GoneForNow]

Originally Posted by jedione12

reading an article called "The Brain" (playboy's june issue)

There was an article? I must have missed that part.

Seriously, I don't know anything about the guy. If you have a link I'd be happy to read and comment.

[jedione12]

not sure if they playboy posts their articles on their website, but you can check w w w.playboy.com and see. the mag is pretty cheap though, plus it's the MOTY (playmate of the year) issue, so you'll def get your $ worth .

the article itself is several pages in length, and pretty well written.

****Link Removed******

[GoneForNow]

The article is not post on the web site. I'll look for other info and get back to you.

[LANMaster]

Welcome JediOne12.
I must caution you, this is a family oriented site.
Playboy.com is not an appropriate link for this site.

If you want to post the article, please do so.

[LANMaster]

Originally Posted by guitar and feather man

I have to say anyone who would be offended by the Playboy site would probably at a guess be already aware of what Playboy is so your critisism of the link which obviously had nothing to do with the NON-articles in PB is pointless . And speaking of pointless the GIANT link to whatever bizarre website upordownvote.com is Doesn't Work its DEAD!

Try the link again.

BTW, I don't think a 10 year old should be clicking a playboy.com site and having to explain to their folks that they got the link from TechSupportGuy.org. That's all. Bigger picture, know what I mean?

[Wino]

Originally Posted by LANMaster

Try the link again.

BTW, [/b]I don't think a 10 year old should be clicking a playboy.com site and having to explain to their folks that they got the link from TechSupportGuy.org.[/b] That's all. Bigger picture, know what I mean?

I would have suspected gbrumb was much older than that, but should have quessed not reading his post.

[angelize56]

Khalid at least is behind bars...Bin Laden remains a threat...I posted an article on Khalid somewhere in CivDeb....but don't want to go through all my posts to find it! BUT..I'm going to go find a good article on him...BRB!

[angelize56]

Here's the page...I remember when I saw that picture of him captured...not much of a man!

http://www.answers.com/topic/khalid-sheikh-mohammed

[MSM Hobbes]

Another link that may be of interest regarding this sick individual:

http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...d/para/ksm.htm

[bonzobob999]

rotten.com Are you allowed to post a link to this site, its old but the content should have got it shut down ages ago. or is it because it links to a specific article?

[bonzobob999]

I really like your style hobbes,*up thumbs* no fuss straight to the cut. can't edit my previous post now......i still have a lot to learn m8.

[coderitr]

It seems to me that if the author was credible that the article would be in some other forum than playboy. It's like the sensationlist report I heard a couple of months ago that we've depleted 1/2 the world's petroleum suppy and all the alternative energy sources either won't work or wont be ready by the time we exhaust the supply of fossil fuels. The author suggested that we would quickly revert to an isolated society because long distance travel would not be possible. His forum? Rolling Stone magazine. My thought? If the only magazine he can get to publish him is Rolling Stone then he is completely full of crap.

[MSM Hobbes]

Originally Posted by bonzobob999

I really like your style hobbes,*up thumbs* no fuss straight to the cut. can't edit my previous post now......i still have a lot to learn m8.

[linskyjack]

Originally Posted by coderitr

It seems to me that if the author was credible that the article would be in some other forum than playboy. It's like the sensationlist report I heard a couple of months ago that we've depleted 1/2 the world's petroleum suppy and all the alternative energy sources either won't work or wont be ready by the time we exhaust the supply of fossil fuels. The author suggested that we would quickly revert to an isolated society because long distance travel would not be possible. His forum? Rolling Stone magazine. My thought? If the only magazine he can get to publish him is Rolling Stone then he is completely full of crap.

Actually, you are the one who if full of ****. Both Playboy and Rolling Stone have some excellent journalists. Stop looking at the pictures and read them.