There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
access audio avg avg 8 bios blue screen boot bsod computer connection cpu crash css dell desktop dma driver drivers dvd email error excel explorer firefox firefox 3 freeze gimp graphics hard drive hardware hijackthis hjt install internet internet explorer itunes keyboard laptop macro malware monitor motherboard network networking outlook outlook 2003 outlook 2007 outlook express pio problem problems router seo server slow sound sp3 spyware trojan usb video virtumonde virus vista vundo windows windows vista windows xp winxp wireless
Civilized Debate
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > Community > Civilized Debate >
Should the U.S. step into Syrian territory or take on the north.


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

 
Thread Tools
Kagami's Avatar
Member with 99 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Experience: Intermediate
18-May-2005, 12:28 PM #1
Should the U.S. step into Syrian territory or take on the north.
Well after sittin back and thinking on other world issues. Well besides Iraq at least. It only makes me wonder, will we really have to step up and take on North Korea. Also will we end up in Syria? I'm particularly interested more with North Korea seeing being that they really don't just don't like US period...
__________________
Case: Rosewill value series "R214P"
CPU: AMD Sempron 2600+ 1.83Ghz @ 333 FSB
Motherboard: MSI "K7N2GM-V" IGP-64 mATX
RAM: 2x256 Buffalo "B-Line" DDR400 @ 200Mhz
Video: Chaintech Nvidia Geforce 6600GT @ 1Ghz GDDR3 Mem/efffective
Hard Drive: Western Digital 80GB 7200RPM w/8mb cache and hd fan
Sound Card: Onboard Realtek 5.1 Surround sound
PSU: Thermaltake 420W w/Dual fans
Peripherals: Logitech MX510 optical mouse, Elite keyboard.
linskyjack's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 22,286 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
18-May-2005, 12:32 PM #2
We are not in a position to take on NK (unless we want to use air and missile strikes) or Syria (I assume to persue terrorists). Our recruiting numbers are so slow that it is becoming critical. The Army for instance only met 42% of the recruiting goals last month. Thats why they are offerring 15 month hitches with the rest of the time served in the Guard (although people are smart enough to know that if you are in the Guard, there is a good chance that you will end up in Iraq. This is the beginning of the end of the Bush war----because people who are desperate for work, training, an education etc, (the backbone of the volunteer Army) are beginning to see that the risks out weigh the advantages.
Kagami's Avatar
Member with 99 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Experience: Intermediate
18-May-2005, 12:35 PM #3
Actually not only the Gaurdsmen but reservists as well I know cuz I'm going this december. Also Air force reservists are going too. Still in the end I hope lame duck bush doesn't pull a draft cuz thats just gonna be ugly.
linskyjack's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 22,286 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
18-May-2005, 12:51 PM #4
Well, if recruitment continues at this rate, he might have to--it would mean the end of him and the end of the war---People won't put up with it. What is now a distant news story will become very real to many Americans.
LANMaster's Avatar
Community Moderator with 42,766 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central USA
Experience: Need no stinking badges
24-May-2005, 11:58 AM #5
Syria Stops "Cooperating"

When the representative of a Ba’athist dictator wants to make an announcement, where else would he go but to the New York Times? Syria Stops Cooperating With U.S. Forces and CIA.

Quote:
WASHINGTON, May 23 - Syria has halted military and intelligence cooperation with the United States, its ambassador to Washington said in an interview, in a sign of growing strains between the two nations over the insurgency in Iraq.

The ambassador, Imad Moustapha, said in the interview on Friday at the Syrian Embassy here that his country had, in the last 10 days, “severed all links” with the United States military and Central Intelligence Agency because of what he called unjust American allegations. The Bush administration has complained bitterly that Syria is not doing enough to halt the flow of men and money to the insurgency in Iraq.

Mr. Moustapha said he believed that the Bush administration had decided “to escalate the situation with Syria” despite steps the Syrians have taken against the insurgents in Iraq, and despite the withdrawal in recent weeks of Syrian troops from Lebanon, in response to international demands.

He said American complaints had been renewed since February, when a half-brother of Saddam Hussein, who was once the widely feared head of Iraq’s two most powerful security agencies, was handed over to the Iraqi authorities after being captured in Syria along with several lieutenants. The renewal of complaints caused Syria to abandon the idea of providing further help, he said.

“We thought, why should we continue to cooperate?” he said.
Saddam’s brother-in-law must have given some interesting information to the Iraqi authorities.
__________________
I’d rather elect McCain and hope he’s telling the truth than elect Obama and hope to God he’s lying.

Better an imperfect Republican than a perfect socialist.

A taxpayer voting for Barack Obama is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders.

No Way, No How, NObama
SlackAli's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 2,501 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: hopelessly lost
Experience: About 130
24-May-2005, 12:17 PM #6
I suspect neither will suffer an attack in the near future, for the reasons that linskyjack states. If I had to bet the house on one though, it would be Syria, as the US can pursue its usual policy of the high-altitude bombing of desert-based targets with only expressions of resigned despair from most of the world.They can hardly upset the Islamic world much more.

An attack on North Korea would provoke consequences which must make even the limited imaginations of the Washingtpon neo-cons scared.

Pretty sure that any further adventures would have to be done by the US alone without even the ragged coalition of the unwilling that exists in Iraq.
Wino's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 11,373 posts.
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Republic of Texas
Experience: Advanced
24-May-2005, 02:16 PM #7
Quote:
Originally Posted by LANMaster
Syria Stops "Cooperating"

When the representative of a Ba?athist dictator wants to make an announcement, where else would he go but to the New York Times? Syria Stops Cooperating With U.S. Forces and CIA.



Saddam?s brother-in-law must have given some interesting information to the Iraqi authorities.
Hope it's better intel than they got from the Iraqi exiles............or at least has a shred of validity.
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 PM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.