[Mulderator]

Originally Posted by bassetman

Oh I forgot that Thomas is black.

Hardly--it is precisely because he is black that you caused you to come to the conclusion you came to.

[bassetman]

Originally Posted by Lan

It’s the perfect storm. Neo-Nazis, CODEPINK, MoveOn.org, and Al Sharpton.

The Rev. Al Sharpton plans to join peace activist Cindy Sheehan, known as the Peace Mom, on Sunday near President Bush’s Texas ranch. Sharpton’s office said Thursday he would participate in a prayer vigil Sunday with Sheehan in Crawford, Texas.

When does CAIR show up?

http://forums.techguy.org/civilized-...on#post2898620

Originally Posted by Lan

Nine: Michael Moore Endorses John Kerry. Enough said. But if you are not yet convinced, Kerry is endorsed by many more disreputable and ridiculous characters, including Ted Kennedy, Jimmy Carter, Al Sharpton, Barbra Streisand, Sean Penn, Martin Sheen, Al Franken, Yasser Arafat, Kim Jong Il, Spanish Prime Minister (and Al Qaeda appeaser) Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, French President (and Friend of Saddam) Jacques Chirac, The New York Times, and The Nation, just to name a few.

...http://forums.techguy.org/civilized-...on#post2059896

my response;

Michael Moore
George Soros
Barbra Streisand
Bruce Springsteen
Oprah Winfrey
Dan Rather
Al Franken
Al Gore
Al Sharpton
Howards Dean
Ted Kennedy
Jesse Jackson
Nancy Pelozi
Maxine (Maxi-pad) Waters
Terry McCauliff
John Edwards
Teresa Kerry (thought at least she apologized for her lie)
John Kerry himself!

The list of dirtbag liars of the Democrat Party goes on and on and on.

http://forums.techguy.org/civilized-...on#post2039249

So are these also examples of racism?

[iltos]

Originally Posted by Mulder

Hardly--it is precisely because he is black that you caused you to come to the conclusion you came to.

actually, it's precisely because he is black that you took issue in the first place...that is the fact in these posts....the above is innuendo...there is nothing to support it.

[bassetman]

And you Mulder?

Originally Posted by Mulder

I was listening to a black lady the other day on Rush! She was talking about this very issue--about how liberals will not nor will they allow conservatives to criticize black people regardless of the screw-up. She was fuming mad about it and she was absolutely right. She said she's and adult and wants to be treated like an adult--if she screws up she wants to be criticized because if she does well, its marignalized and minmized by the fact there's no converse criticism. As Rush said, he wishes there were more like her (and there are more as time goes by). She understands that liberal patronizing is the worse kind of racism. You don't need an "evil" motive to be racist and that's what liberals don't understand. Simply treating someone different, even better, because of their race is racism. Liberals just don't get it though--they pander to blacks and blacks are starting to tire of it. I think once Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and Ted Kennedy die (or go crazy from syphlis), we can really start making some progress in true equality--that is people being treated the same--exactly the same.

http://forums.techguy.org/civilized-...on#post2974963

...

Originally Posted by Mulder

We should not live in fear that we must choose every word carefully so as not to offend some minority group, regardless of the groupI should be able to attack Jesse Jackson and Maxine Waters and Al Sharpton for being idiots just the same as I do Ted Kennedy. or Hilary Clinton or Tom Daschle. Truth of the matter is I always hesitate and am often reluctant to use any derrogatory comments about the former group for fear it will be deemed "racism" (even though I think their policies are idiotic just like Kennedy, Clinton, and Daschle). I've been called a racist many times for expressing a view oppossing government policies that are "designed" (allegedly) to address the problems of racism which I think are ridiculous and will add to the problems.

...http://forums.techguy.org/civilized-...on#post1171673


So only you can do that?

PS Editted to clarify.

[LANMaster]

Bassetman, it's difficult for me to sort out what are your words and what are those you're quoting.
So I will refrain from responding to your post to Mulder. I don't want to get it all mixed up.

Just wanted to let you know.

[LANMaster]

Originally Posted by bassetman

If he were on, then you'd know how some of us feel about Clarence Thomas on the Supremes, except Kennedy is smarter!

Ted Kennedy smarter than Clarence Thomas?
What brings you to that conclusion? Thomas is a highly educated and experienced jurist. Ted's just a dirtbag politician.

Regardless your political views, you can't seriously believe that Ted is smarter than Clarence.


Edit: I do not believe that race has anything to do with this issue, but I would like to know how you come to this conclusion about smarts.

[bassetman]

Originally Posted by Mulder

Hardly--it is precisely because he is black that you caused you to come to the conclusion you came to.

Democrats and the Supreme Court, a (VERY) brief history
by anthonyLA
Thu Jan 26, 2006 at 09:36:12 PM PDT
There were 57 Democratic Senators in 1991, when the Senate approved the nomination of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court. 11 Dem Senators voted yes on the nomination, along with 41 Republicans. Two Republicans actually voted no on the nomination, along with the remaining 46 Democrats.

The ABA was split on Thomas' qualification for the position, with half voting "qualified" (ABA's second lowest rating) and half voting "not qualified" (the lowest rating possible). Not to mention the whole Anita Hill thing (I guess only 48 Senators believed her). Meanwhile the entire ABA voted to give Alito a "very qualified" rating and I seriously doubt that he's been messing around on his wife, we've all seen how crazy she is.

http://www.dailykos.com/tag/Clarence%20Thomas

[bassetman]

Originally Posted by LANMaster

Ted Kennedy smarter than Clarence Thomas?
What brings you to that conclusion? Thomas is a highly educated and experienced jurist. Ted's just a dirtbag politician.

Regardless your political views, you can't seriously believe that Ted is smarter than Clarence.


Edit: I do not believe that race has anything to do with this issue, but I would like to know how you come to this conclusion about smarts.

I didn't bring race into this, Mulder did.

As he said in one of his quotes, he ought to be able to critize a minority person regadless of their race, but apparently he doesn't think I shold be able to.

[bassetman]

Originally Posted by Mulder

As usual, you avoid the question (something you wouldn't get away with in court).

On what basis have you concluded that Kennedy is smarter than Thomas and that Thomas is not intelligent?

Answer the question posed please.

So you can find it!
'
Democrats and the Supreme Court, a (VERY) brief history
by anthonyLA
Thu Jan 26, 2006 at 09:36:12 PM PDT
There were 57 Democratic Senators in 1991, when the Senate approved the nomination of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court. 11 Dem Senators voted yes on the nomination, along with 41 Republicans. Two Republicans actually voted no on the nomination, along with the remaining 46 Democrats.

The ABA was split on Thomas' qualification for the position, with half voting "qualified" (ABA's second lowest rating) and half voting "not qualified" (the lowest rating possible). Not to mention the whole Anita Hill thing (I guess only 48 Senators believed her). Meanwhile the entire ABA voted to give Alito a "very qualified" rating and I seriously doubt that he's been messing around on his wife, we've all seen how crazy she is.

http://www.dailykos.com/tag/Clarence%20Thomas

[bassetman]

Originally Posted by LANMaster

Bassetman, it's difficult for me to sort out what are your words and what are those you're quoting.
So I will refrain from responding to your post to Mulder. I don't want to get it all mixed up.

Just wanted to let you know.

Thanks, I clarified above.

[LANMaster]

Originally Posted by bassetman

I didn't bring race into this, Mulder did.

As he said in one of his quotes, he ought to be able to critize a minority person regadless of their race, but apparently he doesn't think I shold be able to.

I'm aware of that. I didn't think that you had brought race into it.

I still want to know what makes you think Ted is smarter than Clarence. Race is irrelivant. On that we will always agree. I think Mulder would also agree

But if I were to guess, I'd have to assume Clarence to be, not only smarter than Ted, but MUCH smarter.

[LANMaster]

Originally Posted by bassetman

Thanks, I clarified above.

Cool. Thanks. That helps alot.

[bassetman]

Originally Posted by LANMaster

I'm aware of that. I didn't think that you had brought race into it.

I still want to know what makes you think Ted is smarter than Clarence. Race is irrelivant. On that we will always agree. I think Mulder would also agree

But if I were to guess, I'd have to assume Clarence to be, not only smarter than Ted, but MUCH smarter.

As to who is smarter, I guess it's like when you call someone dumb (public figure) it's a personal opinion!

[~Candy~]

I think it is safer to say that Ted is more 'cunning' --- if he were a woman, that would be a misspelling

[Stoner]

Ted doesn't work well in water.
Thomas is a movie critic that enjoys the performances of LongDong Silver.