Mourning the loss of our friend, WhitPhil.
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
Search
 
Civilized Debate
Tag Cloud
access audio black screen blue screen boot bsod connection crash dell desktop driver drivers dvd email error excel firefox hard drive hardware hijackthis internet keyboard laptop malware monitor motherboard network networking outlook problem processor ram recovery registry cleaner router safe mode screen slow sound spyware trojan video virus vista vundo windows windows 7 windows vista windows xp wireless
Search
Search for:
Tech Support Guy Forums > Community > Civilized Debate >
The California Thread

Tip: Click here to scan for System Errors and Optimize PC performance
[ Sponsored Link ]

Thread Tools
poochee's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 66,600 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Experience: Intermediate
11-Feb-2006, 02:09 PM #1
The California Thread
California deserves a thread of it's own. Here is the first offering.

Whine, whine, whine.

Governor faces threat in GOP
Dump Democratic aide or lose support, conservatives say.
Sat Feb 11 02:15:00 PST
By Peter Hecht -- Bee Capitol Bureau

California Republican leaders are struggling behind the scenes to quell an insurrection by angry conservatives who want to strip Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger of the state party endorsement if he doesn't drop his Democratic chief of staff, Susan Kennedy.
The conservative California Republican Assembly's demand for a vote on its "Susan Kennedy Resolution" has tossed a firebomb into efforts to shape the party's agenda at its Feb. 24-26 winter convention in San Jose.

Two leading conservative activists, former state Republican Party Chairman Michael Schroeder and California Republican Assembly President Mike Spence, indicated in interviews that they would back away from the Kennedy resolution if party leaders allow convention votes on four other measures critical of Schwarzenegger's legislative agenda.

The other resolutions oppose Schwarzenegger's proposal to raise the minimum wage, take issue with the governor for appointing too many Democratic judges, call for a balanced budget, and protest taking on additional bond debt to fund Schwarzenegger's $222 billion infrastructure building program.

"We want a full and fair hearing allowing them to be debated on and voted on the floor," Spence said. "Right now it appears as if the governor is afraid of defending his views because he knows they don't enjoy a majority of support."

But the conservative backlash against the governor is crystallizing in an uproar over his appointment of Kennedy, whom the resolution claims "has spent most of her adult life pursuing a partisan Democratic agenda for higher taxes, greater government spending, gay rights, abortion rights ... and other anti-Republican policy issues."

The anti-Kennedy measure calls on the party to withdraw its endorsement of Schwarzenegger, effective March 15.

State GOP President Duf Sundheim said this week that the "vast majority of people don't want to revoke the endorsement" of the governor. Sundheim said he has spoken with Schroeder and other party conservatives in hope of calming the divisive rhetoric before the party convention.

"We think a revocation of the endorsement at this time would be detrimental not only to the governor but to all Republican candidates and especially to the California Republican Party," Sundheim said.

Meanwhile, state Sen. Tom McClintock, R-Thousand Oaks, a conservative who ran against Schwarzenegger during the recall election that toppled Democratic Gov. Gray Davis, has directly appealed to the California Republican Assembly to drop its anti-Kennedy campaign.

He also penned a letter urging Republican convention delegates to "join me by rejecting any misguided effort to divide us by rescinding the party's endorsement of our governor."

In a speech to the Sacramento Press Club on Jan. 24, Schwarzenegger stood by his decision to appoint Kennedy, a former top aide to Davis and past state Democratic Party executive director and leader of the Northern California chapter of the Abortion Rights Action League.

"She's spectacular. She's much better than I thought, and I'm looking forward to working with her for many more years," he said.

When she was appointed, Kennedy spoke passionately about wanting to "change the political dialogue" and end partisan "intolerance that has resulted in gridlock" in California government. She said she was willing to risk her political career to help Schwarzenegger - and his legislative agenda - succeed.

Now the Democratic appointee has come to symbolize divisions in Schwarzenegger's party.

"Susan Kennedy is a convenient chew toy for people to get a hold of," said Schroeder, a Corona del Mar attorney who was state party chairman from 1997 to 1999. "But she is simply a catalyst for things that have built up for a while."

"The governor had a free ride from conservatives for two years when he could take them for granted and not worry about what he did. Now that free ride is over. Conservatives have finally had it with him." Democrats aren't happy either. There's trouble in River City!

Rest of article at: www.sacbee.com
poochee's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 66,600 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Experience: Intermediate
12-Feb-2006, 12:04 PM #2
Special report: Sexual predators evading treatment

Many violent molesters and rapists sent to a state mental facility are being freed with few restrictions after refusing therapy

By Mareva Brown -- Bee Staff Writers Sunday, February 12, 2006

A decade ago, as California was gripped with outrage over the release of a notorious rapist from prison, the state took bold action.
Legislators vowed to keep the highest-risk sex offenders locked up for years after completing their prison sentences. They were to be sent to a maximum-security psychiatric facility - Atascadero State Hospital - for a strict, five-stage treatment program.

California's solution was considered among the nation's toughest.

But the program has a fatal flaw, a six-month investigation by The Bee has found, because there is a much easier way out of Atascadero, one chosen by the vast majority of sexually violent predators housed there: Refuse treatment and bank on winning release through the court hearing each offender receives every two years.

That loophole makes California's get-tough solution in practice one of the most lenient sexually violent predator laws in the nation.

It is precisely how 54 rapists and child molesters won release through the end of 2005 from their Atascadero commitments, according to a review of court records and interviews with dozens of prosecutors, law enforcement officers and sexually violent predators in California, Oregon, Arizona, Missouri and Colorado. Only four men have completed the five-step program, and one of those was returned to custody less than two months after his release.

To be declared a sexually violent predator and sent to Atascadero, offenders must have at least two sex-crime convictions, and prosecutors must convince a court that they are likely to re-offend if released directly from prison.

But there is no guarantee that the offenders will remain in Atascadero.

Some convinced state psychiatrists that they were unlikely to commit a new offense, which obligates the state to set them free. Others won release after juries could not agree whether they should continue to be held. Still others were freed after county district attorneys did not challenge the offenders' petitions for release, judging them too old or infirm to re-offend.

None of the 54 went through the full regimen of treatment the state designed for them. More than two-thirds underwent no treatment at all.

"All they need is a doctor's slip to get out," said Harriet Salarno, president of Crime Victims United of California. "Nobody should be let out unless they're truly rehabilitated."

Instead, an investigation of the program found that in California:

* There's a built-in incentive to refuse treatment, because the few offenders who actually follow the hospital's full program find themselves not only targets of scorn inside Atascadero but subject to both tighter scrutiny and community protests upon release.

* Nearly all of the highest-risk sex offenders released from Atascadero without completing treatment have returned to society with less supervision than lower-risk sex offenders freed directly from prison.

* Members of the public have no sure way to tell if a sexually violent predator has settled in their neighborhood because the state refuses to identify them as such.

Despite that policy, The Bee found the last-known locations of all 54 sexually violent predators who were released through the end of 2005 without completing the treatment program. The search included use of court records, public documents, media archives, Internet search tools and interviews with law enforcement and county prosecutors throughout California. It also relied on cooperation from some Atascadero patients and released sex offenders, as well as California's Megan's List, the attorney general's Internet listing of all sex offenders registered with California law-enforcement agencies.

Eleven of the 54 men are back in custody, including one convicted of molesting two girls he was baby-sitting two years after his release. Two were accused of new sex-related crimes. At least 10 left the state after release, some saying that life as a convicted sex offender is easier outside California, where registration requirements and monitoring efforts can be even less stringent.

Seven have died, and three currently are in violation of their quarterly registration requirements, including one - Donald Warren Delaney - who seems to have disappeared.

Authorities say Delaney, a 77-year-old former Stockton police sergeant, has dropped from sight and may be in Mexico.

Delaney, sentenced to 24 years in prison in 1985 for lewd acts on nine children, was released from Atascadero on March 25. California's Megan's List indicates he is incarcerated, but there is no record of him in any California prison, and San Joaquin County Deputy District Attorney Stephen Taylor said he may have left the country.

One property record linked Delaney to an address in Pollock Pines that turned out to be a logging road with no homes.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the 54 who failed to start or complete treatment simply moved into communities around California and the nation with little or no public notice, no requirement that they wear satellite tracking devices, and none of the parole restrictions heaped on other sexual offenders, such as the ability of law enforcement officials to search their homes and computers without a search warrant.
The only additional monitoring for sexually violent predators who stayed in California was a requirement to register quarterly with local police - as opposed to the annual registration required of other sex offenders.

The sexually violent predators' faces, names and addresses do show up on the state's Megan's List site, along with general descriptions of their crimes, but there's no way to differentiate them from the 63,000 other registered sex offenders depicted there.

Many other states provide more detailed information on offenders and their crimes and whether they are high-risk offenders.

In California, from the top on down, law enforcement officials typically refuse to identify sexually violent predators who have been released. Attorney General Bill Lockyer's office rejected a California Public Records Act request by The Bee for their names and whereabouts.

The state law that set up the Megan's List Web site requires that "sex offender records remain confidential and not subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act," Supervising Deputy Attorney General Janet E. Neely wrote in a response to the request.

Some local law enforcement agencies do pass out fliers in neighborhoods announcing that a sexually violent predator is moving in nearby. Some, among them the San Francisco Police Department, continue to reveal the offenders' identities only to neighbors, citing concern for their privacy and safety.

"It's department policy," said San Francisco Police Inspector Jim Zerga.

Though Zerga won't say so, four sexually violent predators live in San Francisco: Kinn Weber, Keith Tribble, Nicholas Yost and Douglas LeCorno.

Weber was convicted of four counts of sexual assault involving at least two victims, including rape and oral copulation with a person under 14.

Yost, now 65, was convicted of molesting three boys in the early 1990s.

Tribble was just 18 when he was convicted of attempting to rape an 8-year-old female relative, who he later claimed had tried to seduce him. Fifteen years later, he was convicted of fondling the 7-year-old daughter of a former girlfriend. A psychologist testified that the time lapse between the two events, as well as the similarities in the victims, qualified Tribble as a pedophile and sexually violent predator.

LeCorno, 56 - listed as LeCorna on Megan's List - was released in 2000 but landed in court two years ago, charged with failing to properly register. Court records indicate that while he had an address in San Francisco, at that time he was staying at least part-time with friends on the Peninsula while doing construction work. Zerga testified against LeCorno at that hearing.

Still, Zerga told The Bee that San Francisco police policy dictates only that neighbors be notified when a high-risk sex offender moves into the city and he refused to disclose any information about the four men.

"I'd have to justify why I'm disclosing this information," Zerga said. "There's no public interest. I'm not disclosing to the media. I don't see that you're at risk right now."

As a result of such secrecy, many sexually violent predators faded from view after release, mostly back into California communities where even the most vigilant parents would have no way of knowing their true background.

Three are registered as living in Sacramento, including 45-year-old Harold Royster, who was released from Atascadero in 2002 and arrested last year for failing to register properly.

Royster pleaded guilty in a deal that gave him a year in county jail. He is now out on five years' probation.

Delmar Lee Burrows, 42, was convicted in 1990 of molesting two Roseville boys and spent six years in prison and two years in Atascadero. He was released in 1998 after voluntarily having himself castrated, and he now lives in a downtown hotel adjacent to the K Street Mall.

Eighty-year-old Eddie Caperton moved into a south Sacramento nursing home in December 2004 following his release from Atascadero.

Caperton was convicted of sodomizing a 7-year-old girl in Chicago in 1961, court records show, and of lewd acts with another 7-year-old girl near Reno in 1977. He was convicted in 1993 of two counts of lewd acts on a child under 14 in Sacramento and sent to prison until December 2002, when he was committed to Atascadero for treatment.

Despite doing no therapy, Caperton was released two years later after three psychiatrists found that he no longer fit the criteria of a sexually violent predator because he was too old and infirm to pose a threat.

When he got out, no one warned neighbors. If any of them happened across him on the Megan's List site, they would find just a single mention of lewd and lascivious conduct.

As a result, no one has raised objections that Caperton's new home is three-tenths of a mile from a day care center that takes in children ranging in age from 6 weeks to 12 years.

Even if they had, they would have found the law is not on their side: While paroled sex offenders may face legal restrictions against living near schools and day care centers, the sexually violent predators tend to complete their parole period while inside the mental hospital and have no such restrictions upon release.

Caperton spends his days watching television and taking notes on commercials offering Shirley Temple DVDs for sale, he said in an interview at the nursing home. He hopes to relocate.

"If I can find another place, yes, I'll move," said Caperton, who uses a walker to get around and keeps his Atascadero-issued jacket, a beige coat emblazoned with dark "ASH" letters over the left breast, hanging in his closet.

"The old people here make me feel old," he said. "I want someplace where I can lay my body down and get three squares a day."

Public knowledge of a high-risk offender's whereabouts is even more remote if he leaves the state. John Douglas Olson Sr. quietly headed north after winning release from Atascadero in April 2004 without having participated in any therapy.
"If I was in California, I'd have to register every 90 days," said Olson, a 63-year-old retired mechanic and convicted child molester who lives near Medford, Ore.

"Here, I only have to register once a year unless I move," he said. "Here, they say, 'Oh, the next time you're in tell us if you've moved. Don't worry about it.' "

Oregon is one of only two states that do not have any Megan's List information posted on the Internet. If Olson's new neighbors wanted to discover whether he was a sex offender, they would have to request that information from the state by ZIP code or by his name and wait several weeks for a reply in the mail.

More than a year after his release from Atascadero, Olson still had not been assigned a risk level by Oregon authorities, because an Oregon Supreme Court decision put that state's classification system on hold.

"The information we received from California was that he was considered predatory, but he is not currently deemed predatory in Oregon," Vi Beatty, manager of the Oregon State Police's sex offender unit, said last summer.

That nonchalance angers Olson's victim, the daughter of one of his former girlfriends and now a 30-year-old married woman with a teenage daughter.

"I don't think a person like that can ever be healed," said the Bay Area resident, who agreed to be interviewed if she was identified only by her first name, Christina, for fear that her daughter would be harassed at high school.

"That's my personal opinion," Christina said. "If you're a rapist or a pedophile or whatever they want to name them nowadays, you're always going to do it. I don't feel that there's reform for it."

Over the summer, Olson met two reporters and a photographer at a city park in Oregon, near a birthday party for a group of young children in swimsuits.

There are no legal restrictions on where he can go or what he can do, although Olson said he is careful never to be alone with children. He considers himself healed, but fears he would not be able to defend himself against a false accusation if people learned of his history.

"I've had no problems here, because nobody knows," said Olson, who showed off a photo a friend had taken of him the day of his April 2004 release from Atascadero State Hospital. In the snapshot, Olson is making an obscene gesture at the hospital sign.

"I'm pretty sure if the people I associate with here found out, they'd no longer associate with me. Friends, people I square-dance with, ballroom-dance with, those people."

Rest of article at: www.sacbee.com
Mulderator's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 49,969 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
12-Feb-2006, 12:07 PM #3
Quote:
Originally Posted by poochee
Special report: Sexual predators evading treatment

Many violent molesters and rapists sent to a state mental facility are being freed with few restrictions after refusing therapy
And what else would you expect with liberals controllng the state?

Its the people you vote for that support the ACLU, that want to remove all references to God, and that pass laws that make it easer for sexual predators to prey on our children.

Perhaps you should consider that the next time you vote for a pack of liberals!
__________________
Weapon of Mass Instruction!
poochee's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 66,600 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Experience: Intermediate
12-Feb-2006, 06:29 PM #4
You can't discuss anything without getting political. One of these days you're going to have a stroke.
Mulderator's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 49,969 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
12-Feb-2006, 09:19 PM #5
Quote:
Originally Posted by poochee
You can't discuss anything without getting political. One of these days you're going to have a stroke.
That's pretty funny--you start a thread with this:

Quote:
Whine, whine, whine.

Governor faces threat in GOP
Dump Democratic aide or lose support, conservatives say.
And you accuse me of getting politiical!
poochee's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 66,600 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Experience: Intermediate
12-Feb-2006, 10:03 PM #6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulder
That's pretty funny--you start a thread with this:

And you accuse me of getting politiical!
They are whining. That's what all politicians do. Soooooooooo
Mulderator's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 49,969 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
12-Feb-2006, 10:06 PM #7
Quote:
Originally Posted by poochee
They are whining. That's what all politicians do.
No--that's what liberals do.
poochee's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 66,600 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Experience: Intermediate
12-Feb-2006, 10:09 PM #8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulder
No--that's what liberals do.
I disagree.
hotskates's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 6,110 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hot, California
Experience: Advanced
12-Feb-2006, 10:12 PM #9
Quote:
Originally Posted by poochee
California deserves a thread of it's own. Here is the first offering.

Whine, whine, whine.
Hey poochee.......you spelled wine wine wine incorrectly
poochee's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 66,600 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Experience: Intermediate
12-Feb-2006, 10:16 PM #10
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotskates
Hey poochee.......you spelled wine wine wine incorrectly
Yeah! That fits!!
Gabriel's Avatar
Gabriel has a Photo Album
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 15,726 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Currently in NO. California
Experience: Beginner
13-Feb-2006, 01:12 PM #11
That's correct...but you gals need to get the punctuation right too.......
It's ....Wine, wine, wine, HICCUP
hotskates's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 6,110 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hot, California
Experience: Advanced
13-Feb-2006, 02:20 PM #12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabriel
That's correct...but you gals need to get the punctuation right too.......
It's ....Wine, wine, wine, HICCUP
Followed by......."excuse me"!!!
poochee's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 66,600 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Experience: Intermediate
13-Feb-2006, 02:35 PM #13
Burp!!
poochee's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 66,600 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Experience: Intermediate
13-Feb-2006, 04:16 PM #14
Excerpts from:

Minimum wage hike would give marginal boost in costly California
By TOM CHORNEAU, Associated Press Writer
Last Updated 8:12 am PST Monday, February 13, 2006

YUBA CITY, Calif. (AP) - It's been almost two years since Kimberly Ward moved from North Carolina to California with her husband, yet finding a job that pays well enough to keep pace with the state's high cost of living continues to be a struggle.
She's had several jobs that paid $9 an hour - well above the state's minimum wage of $6.75 an hour - but each was temporary. The sales jobs she has been seeking at a local mall in this suburb north of Sacramento aren't likely to pay much more than the minimum.

"They should raise the minimum wage; they should raise it a lot," Ward said. "The cost of living here, compared to where I'm from - it's ten times more."

Ward could get at least part of her wish. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, in one of the political moves he announced after voters resoundingly rejected his special election agenda last fall, has proposed a $1-an-hour increase in the state's minimum wage over two years.

Some Democrats have said it's not enough. Others within the governor's own party are angered that he proposed the increase at all, fearing it will hurt businesses. Whatever the proposal's ultimate fate, the modest increase is likely to provide only a slight improvement to those living on the margins in the nation's costliest state.

Schwarzenegger vetoed legislation last fall that would have boosted the minimum wage $1an hour by July 2007 but also provided automatic increases to keep up with inflation. The governor said he opposes a minimum wage deal that provides automatic bumps.

In his State of the State speech in January, however, he said the economy has improved enough that the state's minimum wage needed to be increased over the next two years.

His office is trying to negotiate a compromise with the Legislature's Democratic leaders. Meanwhile, a coalition of social service and labor groups is collecting signatures for an initiative that asks voters to increase the minimum wage $2 by 2009. They're targeting the November election.

The last boost came in 2002, when California's minimum wage was increased by 50 cents an hour. The state's businesses already are required to pay their employees more than the federal rate of $5.15 per hour but less than other West Coast states. Oregon's minimum wage is $7.25 an hour, while Washington's is $7.35.

About 60 percent of workers earning within a dollar of the minimum wage in California are between the ages of 25 and 64 and work 35 or more hours a week, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.

As an example of the state's high costs, the median home price in California is about $460,000, nearly twice the national average of about $237,000.

Business owners such as Victor Vosburgh, manager of the Oasis Car Wash and Lube in Sacramento, worry about pushing the wage up too far in a short period of time.

"I don't have anyone working for me at minimum wage - people can't live on that," he said.

But if the minimum wage does goes up, he said he probably will be forced to give everyone a pay increase. When that happens, it will pressure him to raise prices on customers.

"What will happen is that we will raise our prices by a dollar and then our volume will go down," Vosburgh said. "That's what happened last time."

Raising the minimum wage should not lead to job losses or inflation because the increase would be relatively small and all businesses will be affected equally, said Michael Reich, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley's Institute of Industrial Relations.

"Individual business owners are looking at their books and their bottom-line. They are not thinking about this as across-the-board," he said. "All of their competitors will be covered, too. These are increases, small increases in cost, but they will be the same for everyone."

Reich studied the effects of San Francisco's boost in the minimum wage to $8.82 an hour two years ago. He found that restaurants in the city increased prices just 2.8 percent, while the number of servers actually grew.


Whatever its final form, the minimum wage proposal is not likely to have a dramatic effect for workers or businesses in California, said Jack Kyser, chief economist for the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp.

"This issue has actually taken on a bigger profile than it really warrants," he said. "It's really a very small part of the work force that earns the minimum. And let's face it, it's time to raise it some."

Read rest of article at: www.sacbee.com
poochee's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 66,600 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Experience: Intermediate
16-Feb-2006, 12:24 AM #15
Excerpts from article, the rest at www.sacbee.com

Lawmakers rush to close loopholes in sex predator program
By Sam Stanton -- Bee Staff Writer
Published 12:59 pm PST Wednesday, February 15, 2006

California lawmakers scrambled Wednesday to introduce bills addressing flaws in the state's system for handling sexually violent predators, with both Democrats and Republicans agreeing on many of the steps that should be taken.

Núñez expects to introduce his bill early next week. He said he is considering a variety of get-tough measures that include amending the law to allow criminals with one sex-related offense to be declared predators and sent to Atascadero for treatment after they complete their prison time.

Current law requires an offender to have two victims, and Republicans said they will ask for the same change.

Both sides are saying they'd also like to:

• Eliminate the hearings that sexually violent predators get every two years to ask for release and to change the law to indeterminate terms.

• Expand the amount of information on the California Megan's List Web site to disclose which offenders who are sexually violent predators, those considered to have a greater risk of re-offending.

• Force offenders to go through treatment before they can be released from the state's maximum-security psychiatric hospitals.

Núñez conceded that some of the measures may be challenged by civil libertarians who feel they go too far, but that "we're going to challenge the Constitution in my Legislature."
Reply Bookmark and Share

Smart Search

Find your solution!



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who want to help you solve your computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.

Thread Tools


You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2009 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.