[John Burns]

Bryan J. Doyle deputy press secretary for the U. S. Department of Homeland Security was arrested yesterday for using the Internet to seduce what he thought was a teenage girl. I guess Bush's appointments of cronies continues to jeopardize this Country. The Conservatives will probably try to tie this to Clinton some way, in attempts to justify this guy! They always do. Story is at:

homeland security press secretary - Google News

And the corruption and crime in the present Administration goes on - and on - and on - and on!

[ekim68]

Like a house of cards...Probably more stuff coming down the pike..

[TooBad]

Originally Posted by John Burns

Bryan J. Doyle deputy press secretary for the U. S. Department of Homeland Security was arrested yesterday for using the Internet to seduce what he thought was a teenage girl. I guess Bush's appointments of cronies continues to jeopardize this Country. The Conservatives will probably try to tie this to Clinton some way, in attempts to justify this guy! They always do. Story is at:

homeland security press secretary - Google News

And the corruption and crime in the present Administration goes on - and on - and on - and on!

Yes, of course only republicans have criminals and jerks in government you lop-sided fool! Both parties are chock full of crooks and elitists who will take whatever they think they can get away with. The Clintons still take the cake by a mile! If you catch em, convict em and throw the bums in jail, just don't try to pretend that your liberal criminals are angels.

[LANMaster]

Originally Posted by TooBad

Yes, of course only republicans have criminals and jerks in government you lop-sided fool! Both parties are chock full of crooks and elitists who will take whatever they think they can get away with. The Clintons still take the cake by a mile! If you catch em, convict em and throw the bums in jail, just don't try to pretend that your liberal criminals are angels.

[bassetman]

Originally Posted by John Burns

Bryan J. Doyle deputy press secretary for the U. S. Department of Homeland Security was arrested yesterday for using the Internet to seduce what he thought was a teenage girl. I guess Bush's appointments of cronies continues to jeopardize this Country. The Conservatives will probably try to tie this to Clinton some way, in attempts to justify this guy! They always do. Story is at:

homeland security press secretary - Google News

And the corruption and crime in the present Administration goes on - and on - and on - and on!

You are right, the list goes on and on and on......

[John Burns]

Originally Posted by TooBad

you lop-sided fool!

lop-sided fool!????????????????????????????????????

Civilized Debate?????????????????????????????????

Don't think he read the title of the forum - I KNEW Clintons would come back as the same old tired argument. Oh, well - guess they have to do something to try to explain their choice between a Rhodes Scholar (Clinton) and an Absolute Fool (Bush). Too bad!

[cristobal03]

Originally posted by TooBad:

The Clintons still take the cake by a mile!

I'm sorry, but if you're referring to Mr. Clinton fooling around with an adult in the Oval Office [being worse than what Doyle is charged with], then you must not have any daughters, nieces, or other young female relatives. Clinton's infraction was an inappropriate use of power; the acts he commited--though ethically questionable--did not constitute a felony. There is no doubt this [Doyle] guy's crime is exponentially worse.

I agree that politicians of any mien can be criminals, but to use Clinton (or any other non-felon) as a standard for comparison [to what Doyle has been charged with] is reprehensible in my opinion. I don't care what party he [Doyle] represents.

chris.

[edit]
For clarity.
[/edit]

[bassetman]

They use that example out of desperation!

It gets old.

[LANMaster]

Originally Posted by cristobal03

I'm sorry, but if you're referring to Mr. Clinton fooling around with an adult in the Oval Office, then you must not have any daughters, nieces, or other young female relatives. Clinton's infraction was an inappropriate use of power; the acts he commited--though ethically questionable--did not constitute a felony. There is no doubt this guy's crime is exponentially worse.

I agree that politicians of any mien can be criminals, but to use Clinton (or any other non-felon) as a standard for comparison is reprehensible in my opinion. I don't care what party he represents.

chris.

Clinton's infraction was lying to congress.

That being said, they should string this predator up by the nads, regardless of his party affiliation.
Shame on you (John Burns) for making this a political issue instead of a criminal issue.

[bassetman]

Originally Posted by LANMaster

Clinton's infraction was lying to congress.

That being said, they should string this predator up by the nads, regardless of his party affiliation.
Shame on you (John Burns) for making this a political issue instead of a criminal issue.

And how many times have you used the Clinton thing for political ends?

[linskyjack]

Originally Posted by cristobal03

I'm sorry, but if you're referring to Mr. Clinton fooling around with an adult in the Oval Office, then you must not have any daughters, nieces, or other young female relatives. Clinton's infraction was an inappropriate use of power; the acts he commited--though ethically questionable--did not constitute a felony. There is no doubt this guy's crime is exponentially worse.

I agree that politicians of any mien can be criminals, but to use Clinton (or any other non-felon) as a standard for comparison is reprehensible in my opinion. I don't care what party he represents.

chris.

Oh please, he wasn't indicted for statutory rape! Monica was of age and knew precisely what she was doing.

[bill.aam]

Originally Posted by bassetman

And how many times have you used the Clinton thing for political ends?

How many times are you guys going to make the accretions that the Dems have no criminals...
This guy Bryan J. Doyle, should if convicted, face severe jail time (period) no matter his political affiliation...

[cristobal03]

Originally posted by linskyjack:

Oh please, he wasn't indicted for statutory rape! Monica was of age and knew precisely what she was doing.

...That's what I'm saying. Might want to reread my post, there.

chris.

[LANMaster]

Originally Posted by bassetman

And how many times have you used the Clinton thing for political ends?

Geebus Bassetman,
I didn't bring Clinton into this argument.
I'mm calling for the harshest of sentences for this creep.

[Stoner]

Originally Posted by LANMaster

Clinton's infraction was lying to congress.

That being said, they should string this predator up by the nads, regardless of his party affiliation.
Shame on you (John Burns) for making this a political issue instead of a criminal issue.

Yeah....it isn't like LAN interjects his objectionable neoconservative views into non political discussions