There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
acer black screen blue screen boot computer connection crash css dell display driver drivers email error excel firefox firefox 3 game hard drive internet internet explorer itunes laptop malware monitor network networking nvidia outlook outlook 2003 outlook express partition password printer problem problems router slow software sound sprtcmd.exe startup trojan usb video virus vista windows windows xp wireless
Civilized Debate
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > Community > Civilized Debate >
Capital punishment -- for or against?


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

View Poll Results: Capital punishment?
For 20 58.82%
Against 12 35.29%
Not sure 2 5.88%
Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll

 
Thread Tools
bomb #21's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 5,988 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The void AKA edge of the Fens
Experience: I bent my wookie :(
02-Oct-2006, 11:12 AM #1
Capital punishment -- for or against?
"Inspired" by another thread. I know I've thought on numerous occasions -- usually on hearing about horrendous child abuse cases -- that the offender in question "doesn't deserve to live". OTOH, doesn't how we treat murderers, sex offenders, etc. define which side of the "civilised line" we're on? What do you feel about capital punishment in general?

One aspect of the debate (for want of a starting point) is the "deterrent" argument. The attached image shows that the trend for Texas seems to have levelled off over the last few years (although 2006 isn't done yet, of course).

TIA,
bomb
Attached Thumbnails
capital-punishment-against-texas-executions.jpg  
__________________
"Love All The People."
Bill Hicks, 1961 - 1994 -- R.I.P.

"I am against religion because it teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world."
Richard Dawkins

"OK, one last time. These are small... but the ones out there are far away. Small ... far away ..."
Father Ted
Rep's Avatar
Rep Rep is offline
Distinguished Member with 3,381 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Wisconsin, USA
02-Oct-2006, 11:23 AM #2
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomb #21
"Inspired" by another thread. I know I've thought on numerous occasions -- usually on hearing about horrendous child abuse cases -- that the offender in question "doesn't deserve to live". OTOH, doesn't how we treat murderers, sex offenders, etc. define which side of the "civilised line" we're on? What do you feel about capital punishment in general?

One aspect of the debate (for want of a starting point) is the "deterrent" argument. The attached image shows that the trend for Texas seems to have levelled off over the last few years (although 2006 isn't done yet, of course).

TIA,
bomb
You may want to check out stats on how many people have been freed from death row after actually having been proven innocent. I think there is an organization called, "The Innocent Project".
bomb #21's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 5,988 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The void AKA edge of the Fens
Experience: I bent my wookie :(
02-Oct-2006, 11:28 AM #3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rep
You may want to check out stats on how many people have been freed from death row after actually having been proven innocent. I think there is an organization called, "The Innocent Project".
I don't doubt it. I know when I've been "for" in my head, it's always been in terms of "provided it's 100% positive that the offender did 'it', then yes". But I did find "The Life of David Gale" (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0289992/) fascinating.

Thanks for your comment.

EDIT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Innocence
__________________
"Love All The People."
Bill Hicks, 1961 - 1994 -- R.I.P.

"I am against religion because it teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world."
Richard Dawkins

"OK, one last time. These are small... but the ones out there are far away. Small ... far away ..."
Father Ted

Last edited by bomb #21 : 02-Oct-2006 11:37 AM.
NateRD23's Avatar
Senior Member with 303 posts.
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Experience: Playing with PCs is the best way to learn
02-Oct-2006, 11:44 AM #4
"The Life of David Gale" is a great movie. A great twist in proving the system is flawed. You would definitely have to know for sure but capital punishment, I think, is a good tool to use. If you think money wise is it cheaper to have someone in prison for life or having someone in prison for lets say 3 yrs and then being put to death?
valis's Avatar
Computer Specs
Community Moderator with 24,525 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texas
Experience: cp/m -->
02-Oct-2006, 11:59 AM #5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rep
You may want to check out stats on how many people have been freed from death row after actually having been proven innocent. I think there is an organization called, "The Innocent Project".
yeah, but that's a loaded stat.....the people who were saved had a valid reasoning behind their being dna tested......I would be willing to bet that if we dna tested every convict on death row, well over 99% of them would belong there.....
thecoalman's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 2,503 posts.
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Experience: What's the shiny red button for? <click>
02-Oct-2006, 12:08 PM #6
Completely for it if we were undoubtedly putting a guilty man to death but that appears to not be the case so I can't support it.
SlackAli's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 2,537 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: hopelessly lost
Experience: About 130
02-Oct-2006, 12:13 PM #7
I've always thought the demand for the death penalty for child murderers and cop killers smacks of populist hypocrisy - why are their killers any more desrving of topping than killers of the disabled, the elderly, or the black guy stabbed by white racists(or vice versa)?

Deterrence effect would work if capital punishment was introduced for all crimes from shoplifting and above, but is unlikely I'd have thought to work where murder is committed by criminal psychopaths or, indeed,in heat of the moment/crimes of passion type killings.
poochee's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 51,909 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Experience: Intermediate
02-Oct-2006, 12:25 PM #8
I am against capital punishment. However, the laws should be changed so that those deserving death are kept in prison for life with no parole.

I will add that I don't greave for those put to death for committing horrendous crimes.
Rep's Avatar
Rep Rep is offline
Distinguished Member with 3,381 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Wisconsin, USA
02-Oct-2006, 01:20 PM #9
Quote:
Originally Posted by valis
yeah, but that's a loaded stat.....the people who were saved had a valid reasoning behind their being dna tested......I would be willing to bet that if we dna tested every convict on death row, well over 99% of them would belong there.....
It is not the 99% we should worry about. It is the 1% being put to death for something they did not do.

This is not about the graphic details of a heineous crime. This is about protecting innocent people from state execution.

It is simple. If you are ok with the state taking somebodies life for a crime they did not commit, be all for the death penalty.

If you are concerned that you or somebody you love could ever be picked up, charged and executed for something you or they did not do, be for life imprissonment with no chance of parole.

If it is a cash issue for you, and you do not want to spend unnecesary tax money, post back and I will direct you to some real waste of money. Not the pocket change type.
__________________
McCain in 08...Continuing the Bush legacy.
poochee's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 51,909 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Experience: Intermediate
02-Oct-2006, 01:47 PM #10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rep
It is not the 99% we should worry about. It is the 1% being put to death for something they did not do.

This is not about the graphic details of a heineous crime. This is about protecting innocent people from state execution.

It is simple. If you are ok with the state taking somebodies life for a crime they did not commit, be all for the death penalty.

If you are concerned that you or somebody you love could ever be picked up, charged and executed for something you or they did not do, be for life imprissonment with no chance of parole.

If it is a cash issue for you, and you do not want to spend unnecesary tax money, post back and I will direct you to some real waste of money. Not the pocket change type.

valis's Avatar
Computer Specs
Community Moderator with 24,525 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texas
Experience: cp/m -->
02-Oct-2006, 02:06 PM #11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rep
It is not the 99% we should worry about. It is the 1% being put to death for something they did not do.

This is not about the graphic details of a heineous crime. This is about protecting innocent people from state execution.

It is simple. If you are ok with the state taking somebodies life for a crime they did not commit, be all for the death penalty.

If you are concerned that you or somebody you love could ever be picked up, charged and executed for something you or they did not do, be for life imprissonment with no chance of parole.

If it is a cash issue for you, and you do not want to spend unnecesary tax money, post back and I will direct you to some real waste of money. Not the pocket change type.
Obviously I am in favor of the death penalty. You remove someone viable from society, then you need to be removed. Also obvoiusly, the justice system has, ahem, certain flaws inherent in it. Just because the justice system is flawed does not sway my thinking one way or the other. The statistics I was talking about as loaded were something to the tune of '24% of death row inmates are innocent'; this is due to the fact that 24% of the requeseted DNA tests turned out good for the inmate, ergo he could walk. Note that Stanley Williams (founder of the crips) was not given the opportunity for a dna test. He was guilty as sin from jump, and was executed for it.

There's a big gray line there. Last week, we had some guy who was handcuffed in the back of a locked police car, got his hands over his feet and therefore in front of him, took out a 9mm and killed the officer. He had gun residue on his hands, on his clothes, and teh 4 spent cartridges were found in the back seat with him My solution? You don't get more guilty than that. The guy that theoretically murdered his wife on christmas eve and then tried to flee to Mexico, and dumped her body in the bay, that falls squarely in the gray area. That needs special attention. The guy who killed the trooper? Take him out back and shoot him. Don't waste any tax money on appeals.
__________________
rate me

M.C.S.A.
M.C.P. - MS Server 2k3, Network Architecture

"Ask Bill why the string in function 9 is terminated by a dollar sign. Ask him, because he can't answer. Only I know that".
- Gary Kildall
Chicon's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 6,681 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: 50° 34' 07.13" N - 04° 10' 23.
Experience: Second socks retriever
02-Oct-2006, 02:25 PM #12
Quote:
Originally Posted by valis
.... The guy that theoretically murdered his wife on christmas eve and then tried to flee to Mexico, and dumped her body in the bay, that falls squarely in the gray area. That needs special attention....
Hi valis,

I remember who you are alluding to. In spite of thin evidences, the guy is waiting in the death row. In Belgium, he would be free with a status-quo verdict (in French, 'le bénéfice du doute' leads to the dismissal of the lawsuit.).
SlackAli's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 2,537 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: hopelessly lost
Experience: About 130
02-Oct-2006, 02:37 PM #13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rep
This is about protecting innocent people from state execution.

It is simple. If you are ok with the state taking somebodies life for a crime they did not commit, be all for the death penalty.
Is this not just collateral damage? I thought everyone accepted this as a justifiable concept nowadays
Rep's Avatar
Rep Rep is offline
Distinguished Member with 3,381 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Wisconsin, USA
02-Oct-2006, 03:27 PM #14
Quote:
Originally Posted by valis
Obviously I am in favor of the death penalty. You remove someone viable from society, then you need to be removed. Also obvoiusly, the justice system has, ahem, certain flaws inherent in it. Just because the justice system is flawed does not sway my thinking one way or the other. The statistics I was talking about as loaded were something to the tune of '24% of death row inmates are innocent'; this is due to the fact that 24% of the requeseted DNA tests turned out good for the inmate, ergo he could walk. Note that Stanley Williams (founder of the crips) was not given the opportunity for a dna test. He was guilty as sin from jump, and was executed for it.

There's a big gray line there. Last week, we had some guy who was handcuffed in the back of a locked police car, got his hands over his feet and therefore in front of him, took out a 9mm and killed the officer. He had gun residue on his hands, on his clothes, and teh 4 spent cartridges were found in the back seat with him My solution? You don't get more guilty than that. The guy that theoretically murdered his wife on christmas eve and then tried to flee to Mexico, and dumped her body in the bay, that falls squarely in the gray area. That needs special attention. The guy who killed the trooper? Take him out back and shoot him. Don't waste any tax money on appeals.
Yes, of course remove the dredge for ever.

This is not about them. This is about you and I being picked up, charged with a crime we did not commit and put to death on false premise. There is no grey line.
valis's Avatar
Computer Specs
Community Moderator with 24,525 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texas
Experience: cp/m -->
02-Oct-2006, 03:35 PM #15
there is a HUGE gray line. You get picked up and are innocent, that is a gray line. The people in charge are much more likely to listen to the prospects of an expensive dna test to prove or disprove one's innocence when there is a valid question of doubt involved; in either of our cases, we would most likely have an alibi, and that right there would be enough to cause the doubt necessary.

Would we have to spend time in prison? Yes, probably years. But it's highly doubtful that we would get executed. Have innocent people been exectuted before? I don't doubt it. But as far as supporting the death penalty for people like the murderer of Klaas, and any other children, or ANY viable member of society, I'm all for it.

But there is a vast gray area that many of the convictions fall into; insanity, etc. I personally think that the lady that drowned her 5 children should have moved to the front of the line; instead, I have to pay her meals for the rest of her life in some looney bin. I disagree with that totally.
__________________
rate me

M.C.S.A.
M.C.P. - MS Server 2k3, Network Architecture

"Ask Bill why the string in function 9 is terminated by a dollar sign. Ask him, because he can't answer. Only I know that".
- Gary Kildall
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who help people like you solve computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.



Thread Tools


You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 PM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.