 | Distinguished Member with 14,990 posts. | | Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: -71.45091, 42.27841 | | Electronic Voting Machines Could Skew Elections | | Distinguished Member with 5,761 posts. | | Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: London UK | | I thought that they already did?
Paq | | Community Moderator with 16,429 posts. | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Sierra Madre, CA Experience: Beginner | | | | | Distinguished Member with 5,761 posts. | | Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: London UK | | Personally, I think that the problem with electronic voting is simply that the more complex any system is, the fewer understand how it works: and could actually audit results and the system.
At least with the manual system, a recount, whilst tiresome is possible, by normal people again and again, and again.
After all, in this age of political integrity in which we currently live  .................................
Paq
__________________ Retreated To Relative Sanity! | | Distinguished Member with 49,969 posts. | | | | | | | Distinguished Member with 5,761 posts. | | Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: London UK | | Thank you for sharing you DIY instructions on how you make your Halloween masks, Mulder. I must say it will be a big improvement for you.
Fail to see the relevance to this thread, however?
Paq | | Distinguished Member with 22,933 posts. | | | | Whenever Mulder doesn't want to deal with a subject, he cut and pastes his tin foil hat cartoon. He is essentially telling everyone that the facts are pretty powerful so rather then deal with them, he attacks the person making the claims. In this case, he doesn't want to talk about voting machines that don't leave a paper trails. Another thing about Mulder that I find interesting is that he accepts pretty much everything the government tells him, as long as they don't increase taxes. He trusts power, and that isn't a very conservative thing!
__________________ Green | | Distinguished Member with 5,761 posts. | | Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: London UK | | Q. E. D.
Mulder, the Oligarch?
Paq | | Distinguished Member with 14,990 posts. | | Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: -71.45091, 42.27841 | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by linskyjack Whenever Mulder doesn't want to deal with a subject, he cut and pastes his tin foil hat cartoon. He is essentially telling everyone that the facts are pretty powerful so rather then deal with them, he attacks the person making the claims. In this case, he doesn't want to talk about voting machines that don't leave a paper trails. Another thing about Mulder that I find interesting is that he accepts pretty much everything the government tells him, as long as they don't increase taxes. He trusts power, and that isn't a very conservative thing! | Does that mean he wears the tin hat to bed, or does he take it off at night?
-- Tom | | Distinguished Member with 39,525 posts. | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Dayton,Oh |
24-Oct-2006, 08:38 AM
#10 | It's soldered on | | Distinguished Member with 2,112 posts. | | Join Date: Nov 2004 Experience: Intermediate |
24-Oct-2006, 09:25 AM
#11 | It does not matter one iota what sort of ballots or voting apparatus is used. Whenever a Democrat loses an election, especially a close one, the Democrats will always claim they lost because votes were not counted, primarily in predominantly black neighborhoods. Then they will claim, as they always do, that it is due to Republican dirty tricks and Republican racism.
It was the fiasco in Florida precipitated by Democratic sore losers that gave new impetus to efforts to move away from physical ballots. Ironically, the punch card ballots probably give the the best balance of efficiency and accuracy of all available voting formats, as well as a physical record that can be recounted. To the extent that there can be errors in punch card voting, the errors are probably proportionately distributed across party lines, so errors are unlikely to change results. | | Distinguished Member with 22,933 posts. | | |
24-Oct-2006, 09:34 AM
#12 | Again, dont make this a political issue. This is an issue that can effect both democrats and republicans. At the very foundation of the democracy is the vote, and the sanctity of the vote. When you can't audit an election, you have major problems. There is absolutely on reason that our elections can't be above aboard and auditible.
__________________ Green | | Distinguished Member with 14,990 posts. | | Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: -71.45091, 42.27841 |
27-Oct-2006, 04:03 PM
#13 | Diebold Quietly Repaired Voting Machines http://www.physorg.com/news81175082.html
(AP) -- Diebold Election Systems quietly replaced flawed components in several thousand Maryland voting machines in 2005 to fix a "screen-freeze" problem the company had discovered three years earlier, according to published reports Thursday.
State Board of Elections Chairman Gilles W. Burger said Diebold's failure to fully inform board members of the repairs at the time raises questions about whether the company violated its state contracts.
-- Tom
__________________ The independence created by philosophical insight is - in my opinion - the mark of distinction
between a mere artisan or specialist and a real seeker after truth. - Einstein 1944
Imagination is more important than knowledge. - Einstein | | Senior Member with 1,462 posts. | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Experience: 8th hindu reincarnation -- Praise Allah |
27-Oct-2006, 04:35 PM
#14 | If the democrats win, we will know that the machine was hacked. | | Distinguished Member with 49,969 posts. | | |
27-Oct-2006, 05:17 PM
#15 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by linskyjack Again, dont make this a political issue. This is an issue that can effect both democrats and republicans. At the very foundation of the democracy is the vote, and the sanctity of the vote. When you can't audit an election, you have major problems. There is absolutely on reason that our elections can't be above aboard and auditible. | What a crock!  There's NOTHING WRONG WITH THE DAMN MACHINES!!! This is more tinfoil hat liberal nonsense. If Republicans had lost the Presidential election, none of this would even have come up. Recounts in 2000 proved Democrats lost and they lost in 2004--get over it man--its getting silly at this point.
__________________ Weapon of Mass Instruction! | |
Smart Search
| Find your solution! | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | |  WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who want to help you solve your computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.
| You Are Using: |
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2009 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. | |
|