There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
access audio avg avg 8 bios blue screen boot bsod computer connection cpu crash css dell desktop dma driver drivers dvd email error excel explorer firefox firefox 3 freeze gimp graphics hard drive hardware hijackthis hjt install internet internet explorer itunes keyboard laptop macro malware monitor motherboard network networking outlook outlook 2003 outlook 2007 outlook express pio problem problems router seo server slow sound sp3 spyware trojan usb video virtumonde virus vista vundo windows windows vista windows xp winxp wireless
Civilized Debate
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > Community > Civilized Debate >
Nevada and Colorado to vote on state wide legalization of Marijuana.


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

 
Thread Tools
diablo75's Avatar
Senior Member with 469 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Experience: Advanced
26-Oct-2006, 10:49 PM #1
Cool Nevada and Colorado to vote on state wide legalization of Marijuana.
Preliminary polls show it's going to be very close.

I don't have much to say yet, other than I'd like to see it legalized so we can finally stop wasting so much money on putting non-violent people in prision for smoking a plant. I've written a LOT on this topic, and am looking forward to seeing what people in this forum think about this issue. But for now, I would just like to ask what people in here generally feel about this issue, and what they'd like to see done.

Peronally I'm surprised Oregon hasn't had something like this proposed before, as they've already decriminalized it state wide...

Anyway, have at it!
loserOlimbs's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 6,450 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wichita, KS
Experience: Priceless
26-Oct-2006, 11:03 PM #2
Just keep 'em smoking and driving... and thats all I need.
kidcnote's Avatar
Account Disabled with 1,815 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Experience: Intermediate
26-Oct-2006, 11:06 PM #3
Quote:
Originally Posted by diablo75
Preliminary polls show it's going to be very close.

I don't have much to say yet, other than I'd like to see it legalized so we can finally stop wasting so much money on putting non-violent people in prision for smoking a plant. I've written a LOT on this topic, and am looking forward to seeing what people in this forum think about this issue. But for now, I would just like to ask what people in here generally feel about this issue, and what they'd like to see done.

Peronally I'm surprised Oregon hasn't had something like this proposed before, as they've already decriminalized it state wide...

Anyway, have at it!
It's been tried before in Nv and shot down. No matter how it comes out the Gubment still considers it a crime to possess no matter what State laws a legislature passes. Federal trumps state laws any and every day of the week.

Last edited by kidcnote : 26-Oct-2006 11:35 PM.
diablo75's Avatar
Senior Member with 469 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Experience: Advanced
26-Oct-2006, 11:18 PM #4
Cool Hmmm...
Quote:
Originally Posted by loserOlimbs
Just keep 'em smoking and driving... and thats all I need.
So... Nevada and Colorado are voting on legalizing the operation of an automobile or heavy machinery while intoxicated. You've clearly thought this through.
loserOlimbs's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 6,450 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wichita, KS
Experience: Priceless
26-Oct-2006, 11:35 PM #5
Whoops, meant keep them from smoking and driving.

I don't want them driving while their stoned, not a pretty sight!
diablo75's Avatar
Senior Member with 469 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Experience: Advanced
26-Oct-2006, 11:44 PM #6
Ok!
Quote:
Originally Posted by loserOlimbs
Whoops, meant keep them from smoking and driving.

I don't want them driving while their stoned, not a pretty sight!
Now I can agree with that. I think legal in home personal use (or in church) is all I think is necessary to make most happy.
kidcnote's Avatar
Account Disabled with 1,815 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Experience: Intermediate
27-Oct-2006, 12:00 AM #7
Quote:
Originally Posted by diablo75
Now I can agree with that. I think legal in home personal use (or in church) is all I think is necessary to make most happy.
That is until you get the SUPER MUNCHIES 10 min after smoking some Skunk and then climb into your car with crappy brakes heading for 7/11 and running through the front plate glass and kill 12 other hippies who we're there for the same reason..

Karma, it's just not for breakfast anymore
linskyjack's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 22,219 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
27-Oct-2006, 12:20 AM #8
Quote:
Originally Posted by diablo75
So... Nevada and Colorado are voting on legalizing the operation of an automobile or heavy machinery while intoxicated. You've clearly thought this through.
No, its just like booze. Neither state says its legal to drink and drive and the same would be the case for reefer. The drug war is one of the greatest shames perpetrated on the American people. Billions of dollars go into interdiction, rehabilitation, etc and the problem only gets worse!
__________________
Green
kidcnote's Avatar
Account Disabled with 1,815 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Experience: Intermediate
27-Oct-2006, 12:28 AM #9
Quote:
Originally Posted by linskyjack
No, its just like booze. Neither state says its legal to drink and drive and the same would be the case for reefer. The drug war is one of the greatest shames perpetrated on the American people. Billions of dollars go into interdiction, rehabilitation, etc and the problem only gets worse!
The problem is weak willed losers who havn't any will power and succomb to peer pressure. There would be no drug problem if you just say no. (Hey man, I got some sweet weed and crank. No Thanks man) --- See how Ez that was.. You start doing public executions of dope dealers and that would help the problem. And I don't mean 10 yrs after conviction. You get convicted and it's an automatic 1 month in solitary and then it's bye bye.
BanditFlyer's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 11,002 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: BOT бaHДиT
Experience: It Depends
27-Oct-2006, 12:43 AM #10
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidcnote
The problem is weak willed losers who havn't any will power and succomb to peer pressure. There would be no drug problem if you just say no. (Hey man, I got some sweet weed and crank. No Thanks man) --- See how Ez that was.. You start doing public executions of dope dealers and that would help the problem. And I don't mean 10 yrs after conviction. You get convicted and it's an automatic 1 month in solitary and then it's bye bye.
What an ingenius insight. I think the democratic party has an opening for new spokesperson, since Howard Dean is proving to be not quite radical enough. You should send in your resume.
ekim68's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 15,488 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Experience: Still kickin'
27-Oct-2006, 12:48 AM #11
Quote:
Originally Posted by loserOlimbs
Whoops, meant keep them from smoking and driving.

I don't want them driving while their stoned, not a pretty sight!
Yep, same as alcohol...I'm tired of people weaving in front of me when they're straight..
(And, early morning is the worst time...)
kidcnote's Avatar
Account Disabled with 1,815 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Experience: Intermediate
27-Oct-2006, 12:49 AM #12
Quote:
Originally Posted by BanditFlyer
What an ingenius insight. I think the democratic party has an opening for new spokesperson, since Howard Dean is proving to be not quite radical enough. You should send in your resume.

No, Howard is good where he's presently at, plus I can't get that scream like he does.
You want results or fluff. The world was built on radical ideas. Good and bad. and you think I have "ingenius insight". Thanks, I knew you'd smarten up hanging around me.
redivivus's Avatar
Senior Member with 1,457 posts.
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Experience: 8th hindu reincarnation -- Praise Allah
27-Oct-2006, 01:02 AM #13
I feel sorry for anyone who buys drugs and and gets high on a daily basis to hide from their problems or depression. I definately do not support legalization, regardless of whether or not it is unhealthy. Some people need to learn how to face their problems and actually do something with their life. There are hundreds of millions of people starving around the world that would die (figure of speech) to live in north america with a job and food, and meanwhile we have people sitting around here thinking they live in happy land, wasting oxygen and space with their pathetic existance.

I know some people like this. Their life is: work, get high, party, get drunk, sleep, work.... The cycle loops over and over. One of them almost died when he, drunk and high, hit a tree, speeding away from cops in an unregistered vehicle with a suspended license. I dont even think that broke the cycle though.
__________________
Knowing others is wisdom;
Knowing the self is enlightenment.
Mastering others requires force;
Mastering the self needs strength.
~ Lao Tzu

If the rest of them can survive only by destroying us, then why should we wish them to survive?
~ Ayn Rand
sglv's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 3,131 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Experience: Beginner
27-Oct-2006, 01:02 AM #14
Quote:
Originally Posted by diablo75
Preliminary polls show it's going to be very close.

I don't have much to say yet, other than I'd like to see it legalized so we can finally stop wasting so much money on putting non-violent people in prision for smoking a plant. I've written a LOT on this topic, and am looking forward to seeing what people in this forum think about this issue. But for now, I would just like to ask what people in here generally feel about this issue, and what they'd like to see done.

Peronally I'm surprised Oregon hasn't had something like this proposed before, as they've already decriminalized it state wide...

Anyway, have at it!
I'm voting in favor of it. Nevada is limited to having no more than an ounce (I don't even really know how that is), and it can only be enjoyed at home. Not outside, not in restaurants, not while you're sitting there gambling. The taxes imposed are a good thing. The state would also save money by not having to arrest and incarcerate pot smokers.
__________________
SG
My vanity is not worth the life of an animal: https://community.hsus.org/campaign/...8iiwdzy5x6bbw?
ekim68's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 15,488 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Experience: Still kickin'
27-Oct-2006, 01:04 AM #15
Quote:
Originally Posted by sglv
I'm voting in favor of it. Nevada is limited to having no more than an ounce (I don't even really know how that is), and it can only be enjoyed at home. Not outside, not in restaurants, not while you're sitting there gambling. The taxes imposed are a good thing. The state would also save money by not having to arrest and incarcerate pot smokers.
Yep, it's about time the state gets in on some of the money. Sounds like everyone wins.
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 PM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.