Quote:
Originally Posted by Koot ...
STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?
Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, and our nation was the most prosperous in the world.
We had absolutely no national debt - had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.
What happened? Can you spell "politicians!"
And I still have to "press 1" for English. |
I'd love to see some qualifiers for that remark. And some back-up. (e.g. "most prosperous", in what context? from what perspective? -- not saying you're wrong, just interested in the source and POV here. Thanks.)
As for New Orleans, and Landrieu's money request:
1 - She's not going to get that much money, and she knows it, but expects it to be whittled down to a figure closer to what she really thinks they need (and she really thinks will get her the most votes).
2 - Dividing that figure by the population is interesting, by falsely informative -- money is needed for infrastructure repair/rebuilding, and expensive Levees, and expensive wet-lands repair -- all for protection from future Hurricanes.
3 - Before you suggest that New Orleans is below sea level and maybe shouldn't be rebuilt, that really isn't an option -- it's the largest commodities port in the US, and as a port and rail nexus, it's just too important. (Replacing all that will be a lot MORE expensive!)
4 - Fixing the wetlands and Levees is a pay me now or pay me a LOT more later kind of a thing, you've already seen the result of NOT paying now for sufficient Levees -- repeating that mistake will repeat this catastrophy and massive levels of expense all over again down the road -- so the expense can be shouldered now, for less, or later for more.
...now if you want to debate whom should appropriately shoulder that expense, that would be a different point of debate.
Thanks,
J
