Live Chat & Podcast at 1:00PM Eastern on Sunday!
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
Search
Civilized Debate
Tag Cloud
access acer asus bios bsod computer crash desktop driver drivers error ethernet excel freeze gaming hard drive hardware hdmi internet laptop malware memory modem monitor motherboard network printer problem ram registry router security slow software sound toshiba trojan ubuntu 11.10 uninstall usb video virus vista wifi windows windows 7 windows 7 32 bit windows 7 64 bit windows xp wireless
Search
Search for:
Tech Support Guy Forums > Community > Controversial Topics > Civilized Debate >
Would lowering DUI levels be counterproductive??

 
Thread Tools
wacor's Avatar
wacor has a Photo Album
Distinguished Member with 27,401 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: You will never know
Experience: Depends on the definition
21-Jan-2008, 02:32 PM #1
Would lowering DUI levels be counterproductive??
Will lowering blood alcohol levels to less than .08 make a difference and if so how?

The MADD crowd would probably like to see it dropped to zero which is a laudable goal. However lowering the current limits IMO will do nothing other than to make criminals out of people that are not drunk. The drivers that are making things dangerous are the ones who have double the legal limit and not those who have had 2-4 drinks.

Instead of lowering the limits in a search for results how about we take the existing laws more seriously like they do in many countries in Europe. Over there it is almost a stigma to drink and drive. It is the norm to either have a designated driver or people drinking are stopped from driving. Seems like that is a better way to approach this but then that would take some serious changes to the mindset of the judicial system along with making the laws tougher on those who are drunk.

I have stated a few times I was rear ended by a guy that was blind drunk in the middle of an afternoon. He was as drunk as I have ever seen anybody. almost to the point of being comatose. when we finally got him to stop and blocked the car he just sat there. after the police arrested him the one cop indicated he had at least 5 prior DUI convictions. How many times do dangerous people like this get chances and how many people have to be killed or hurt by a raging drunk before we lock these people up for years.

No the causal drinker should not be made a criminal. we need to lock up the existing drunks who are out there. and we know who they are yet give them chance after chance to go out there and risk others lives.
__________________
Conservatives in Exile Club
http://forums.techguy.org/group.php?groupid=34
if you want an invite just ask
Fidelista's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 9,830 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
21-Jan-2008, 06:51 PM #2
If less than .08 is required , then how could alcohol be sold in any bar , restaurant ,or any public place?.
The only way to be sure of not getting busted would be stay at home. Less than .08 is would be a problem.
It would be much like a prohibition.
It would make no sense to me.
You would have business selling drink legally and profitably , and anyone who consumed it subject to jailing . Lets see how a proposal to stop drinking in a public establishment would go over >f
__________________
"When you give food to the poor, they call you a saint. When you ask why the poor have no food, they call you a communist".
Archbishop Hélder Pessoa Câmara
TRS-80 vet's Avatar
Account Closed with 3,152 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Experience: Beginnerd/Mensan -
21-Jan-2008, 07:00 PM #3
Making (or changing) a law, or changing the penalty therefor, stops no one from breaking it.
Bastiat's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 5,158 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
21-Jan-2008, 07:09 PM #4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fidelista View Post
If less than .08 is required , then how could alcohol be sold in any bar , restaurant ,or any public place?.
The only way to be sure of not getting busted would be stay at home. Less than .08 is would be a problem.
It would be much like a prohibition.
It would make no sense to me.
You would have business selling drink legally and profitably , and anyone who consumed it subject to jailing . Lets see how a proposal to stop drinking in a public establishment would go over >f
How about having one person who doesn't drink?
Littlefield's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 12,613 posts.
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
21-Jan-2008, 07:13 PM #5
DUI laws have lots of loopholes for lawyers especially in SC . Even if it is above .08 a good lawyer can get you off.
Fidelista's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 9,830 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
21-Jan-2008, 07:18 PM #6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bastiat View Post
How about having one person who doesn't drink?
Its not realistic . A couple goes out , has a couple of glasses of wine , happens all the time . They are not going to drag somebody along . Besides , its hard to find someone to hang around just to drive .
I do not believe in driving drunk , but like anything else , this stuff can be overdone . >f
__________________
"When you give food to the poor, they call you a saint. When you ask why the poor have no food, they call you a communist".
Archbishop Hélder Pessoa Câmara
wacor's Avatar
wacor has a Photo Album
Distinguished Member with 27,401 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: You will never know
Experience: Depends on the definition
21-Jan-2008, 07:27 PM #7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fidelista View Post
Its not realistic . A couple goes out , has a couple of glasses of wine , happens all the time . They are not going to drag somebody along . Besides , its hard to find someone to hang around just to drive .
I do not believe in driving drunk , but like anything else , this stuff can be overdone . >f
Well it may be overdone but there are movements to lower the DUI level.

If I remember right was it not .15 at one time long ago?
Bastiat's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 5,158 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
21-Jan-2008, 07:31 PM #8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fidelista View Post
Its not realistic . A couple goes out , has a couple of glasses of wine , happens all the time . They are not going to drag somebody along . Besides , its hard to find someone to hang around just to drive .
I do not believe in driving drunk , but like anything else , this stuff can be overdone . >f
I didn't say I support the lowering but someone needs to be responsible. One drink can impair the ability to drive, even if its almost imperceptible. The question becomes, did that little difference allow the accident to occur.
valley's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 19,149 posts.
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Experience: Intermediate
21-Jan-2008, 07:37 PM #9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fidelista View Post
If less than .08 is required , then how could alcohol be sold in any bar , restaurant ,or any public place?
hate to say it but I get drunk on a half a beer. Seriously. But I have a high tolerance to wine. Either that or wine gives me a different feeling than beer and I dont feel drunk..just relaxed. Either way, I wouldnt drive after a glass of wine, even though I dont feel drunk any more than I would after drinking a half a beer and feel drunk. The fact is that alcohol changes your response time. My relaxed feeling after drinking wine is all it might take for me to not be able to stop in time if someone's child ran out in front of me.
valley's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 19,149 posts.
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Experience: Intermediate
21-Jan-2008, 07:41 PM #10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bastiat View Post
The question becomes, did that little difference allow the accident to occur.
Exactly.

Besides, i'd rather not have that little "what-if" to ponder for the rest of my life if I killed someone in a car accident after having one drink. At least sober, you know that it was unavoidable.
pyritechips's Avatar
pyritechips has a Photo Album
Computer Specs
Community Moderator with 24,368 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
21-Jan-2008, 08:07 PM #11
I believe in Draconian measure for bot drunk drivers and dangerous drivers: lose your licence for 5 years. Second offence: lose it forever. Driving is a priviledge, not a right.
pyritechips's Avatar
pyritechips has a Photo Album
Computer Specs
Community Moderator with 24,368 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
21-Jan-2008, 08:10 PM #12
Quote:
Originally Posted by valley View Post
Exactly.

Besides, i'd rather not have that little "what-if" to ponder for the rest of my life if I killed someone in a car accident after having one drink. At least sober, you know that it was unavoidable.
At least sober? I have seen dangerous, selfish, self-absorbed sober drivers risking the lives of others. Even sober, most accidents are avoidable. In this province, which is home to the worst drivers in the country, the cause of fully 80% of all accidents are classified as "driver error".
Fidelista's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 9,830 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
21-Jan-2008, 08:25 PM #13
Quote:
Originally Posted by valley View Post
hate to say it but I get drunk on a half a beer. Seriously. But I have a high tolerance to wine. Either that or wine gives me a different feeling than beer and I dont feel drunk..just relaxed. Either way, I wouldnt drive after a glass of wine, even though I dont feel drunk any more than I would after drinking a half a beer and feel drunk. The fact is that alcohol changes your response time. My relaxed feeling after drinking wine is all it might take for me to not be able to stop in time if someone's child ran out in front of me.
All I am saying is this , if it only takes one beer , or a glass of wine to be jailed , then alcohol should prohibited from being consumed in a public establishment .
You get to the point where you would drive in , park in parking lot provided , and then be arrested on leaving.
A field day for cops and lawyers !.
I agree , any amount of alcohol has an effect , its the degree that is in question.
People who work too many hours{ fatigue} are also slow in response time. Even a common cold slows response .
I used to avoid flying , esp at night which I loved to do , when sick with cold , would be better off full of beer --no joke.. Worse than a sixpack by far. I once landed on a road at night , and after landing , seen that I just missed powerlines crossing the road , something I normally looked for , could have killed me . I screwed up all night , no alcohol , just sick with head cold..
I have lost a son, 5 yr old , to a drunk driver , so make no mistake about how I feel . The woman who killed my son was DRUNK off her arse--teenage girl. I do not think drunk driving or flying -is funny.
That said , I would hope that people could continue to have drinks with dinner , maybe pizza and beer , or a stop for a drink at pub without a problem.
Its all about what degree , how far someone wants to go .
I could live with a prohibition of public drinking , but I think its unreasonable .
I think the law is just fine as it stands .
If we really wanted to get serious about drunks --it would have to deal severely with repeat offenders somehow , they will kill.
In the case of my son , nothing will prevent those things , teenagers are a danger to us all , and themselves , its just the way it is . We can only hope that they escape teen years without killing themselves , or others. I have driven when I shouldn't have , but thank god , I got away with it .
>f
__________________
"When you give food to the poor, they call you a saint. When you ask why the poor have no food, they call you a communist".
Archbishop Hélder Pessoa Câmara
Guyzer's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 11,089 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Fraser Valley Area of B.C.
Experience: Coupla times
21-Jan-2008, 08:28 PM #14
Quote:
Originally Posted by valley View Post
hate to say it but I get drunk on a half a beer.
Cheap date eh..
Quote:
Originally Posted by valley View Post
Seriously. But I have a high tolerance to wine.
For Carls sake stick to the beer ok..
Quote:
Originally Posted by valley View Post
Either that or wine gives me a different feeling than beer and I dont feel drunk..just relaxed.
For Carls sake please feel free to drink as much wine as you want.
Quote:
Originally Posted by valley View Post
Either way, I wouldnt drive after a glass of wine, even though I dont feel drunk any more than I would after drinking a half a beer and feel drunk.
We have something in common.
Quote:
Originally Posted by valley View Post
The fact is that alcohol changes your response time.
And that's an indisputable fact which most drinkers refuse to acknowledge.
TRS-80 vet's Avatar
Account Closed with 3,152 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Experience: Beginnerd/Mensan -
21-Jan-2008, 08:35 PM #15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guyzer View Post
Cheap date eh..

For Carls sake stick to the beer ok..

For Carls sake please feel free to drink as much wine as you want.

We have something in common.

And that's an indisputable fact which most drinkers refuse to acknowledge.
Guyzer? Ya mean guzzler?
 

THIS THREAD HAS EXPIRED.
Are you having the same problem? We have volunteers ready to answer your question, but first you'll have to join for free. Need help getting started? Check out our Welcome Guide.

Search Tech Support Guy

Find the solution to your
computer problem!




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who want to help you solve your computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.
Thread Tools



Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter TechGuy.tv TechGuy.tv Mobile TSG Mobile
You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:11 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2011 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.

Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.