There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
acer black screen boot computer connection crash css dell display driver drivers email error ethernet excel explorer firefox firefox 3 freeze game hard drive internet internet explorer itunes laptop linux malware monitor network networking nvidia outlook outlook 2003 outlook express partition password printer problem router slow software sound trojan usb video virus vista windows windows xp wireless
Civilized Debate
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > Community > Civilized Debate >
Banning Obese From Being Served In Restaurants


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

 
Thread Tools
twinofangelize56's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 10,412 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Michigan
Experience: Oh, yes... of course!
11-Feb-2008, 08:04 AM #1
Banning Obese From Being Served In Restaurants
What do you think about this? Who decides who is obese and shouldn't be served? Would you have to hop on a scale before you are seated?

Excerpt:
FEBRUARY 1--Mississippi legislators this week introduced a bill that would make it illegal for state-licensed restaurants to serve obese patrons. Bill No. 282, a copy of which you'll find below, is the brainchild of three members of the state's House of Representatives, Republicans W. T. Mayhall, Jr. and John Read, and Democrat Bobby Shows. The bill, which is likely dead on arrival, proposes that the state's Department of Health establish weight criteria after consultation with Mississippi's Council on Obesity. It does not detail what penalties an eatery would face if its grub was served to someone with an excessive body mass index.

Read more about the House Bill here:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...01081fat1.html
__________________
It doesn't matter where you go or what you do or how much you have.
What matters is who you have beside you.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* MFP * 7/21/56~7/14/07 * Pixie * Angelize56 *

THE THREE B's:
*BALD* ----- *BEAUTIFUL* ----- *BEA*
ChrisJones's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 3,423 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wales, UK
Experience: I'd Like to say Einstein but I'm not....
11-Feb-2008, 08:26 AM #2
Littlefield's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 7,609 posts.
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
11-Feb-2008, 09:14 AM #3
Quote:
Originally Posted by twinofangelize56 View Post
What do you think about this? Who decides who is obese and shouldn't be served? Would you have to hop on a scale before you are seated?

Excerpt:
FEBRUARY 1--Mississippi legislators this week introduced a bill that would make it illegal for state-licensed restaurants to serve obese patrons. Bill No. 282, a copy of which you'll find below, is the brainchild of three members of the state's House of Representatives, Republicans W. T. Mayhall, Jr. and John Read, and Democrat Bobby Shows. The bill, which is likely dead on arrival, proposes that the state's Department of Health establish weight criteria after consultation with Mississippi's Council on Obesity. It does not detail what penalties an eatery would face if its grub was served to someone with an excessive body mass index.

Read more about the House Bill here:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...01081fat1.html

Like a lot of stupid bills it will never pass .
linskyjack's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 22,461 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
11-Feb-2008, 09:16 AM #4
And conservatives want to give more control to state legislatures?
ChrisJones's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 3,423 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wales, UK
Experience: I'd Like to say Einstein but I'm not....
11-Feb-2008, 09:37 AM #5
There are so many problems forseeable with that bill, what if it's a healthfoods restaraunt? (Not sure how many "healthfoods" restaraunts there in Mississippi though!!) Are they gonna fine them for feeding an obese person a healthy meal??

Legislation is not the way to deal with the obesity epidemic affecting both the US and UK. Education is, make people understand they damage they are doing by shoveling all the unhealthy stuff in their mouths, if they have the information to make the correct decision they can blame no one else but themselves.

I say this from the perspective of someone who has recently realised the damage I've been doing to my body and changed his ways.
__________________
The eight scariest words in the English Language:
"Is your seatbelt on? I'm gonna try something"

When Google can't find something, it asks Jack Bauer for help.

Goodbye Marlene, You'll always be remembered.
TRS-80 vet's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 2,591 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Experience: Beginnerd/Mensan -
11-Feb-2008, 09:50 AM #6
Republicans W. T. Mayhall, Jr. FOR PRESIDENT!
and John Read VP
, and Democrat Bobby Shows SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE!
TRS-80 vet's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 2,591 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Experience: Beginnerd/Mensan -
11-Feb-2008, 10:18 AM #7
Fat is a behavior of choice.

Eat less, lose weight. Eat more, gain weight. Yes, it's as simple as that. Otherwise, you've solved the energy crisis (and defied one of Newton's/thermodynamics laws)

You are not hungry.

You blood passes through your brain (cpu), and gets 'read' for essentials - water, sugar, nutrients, etc. Eat some ham, bacon, sausage, something salty, and the salt moves from your GI tract, to the bloodstream, and finally into the cells. The increased intracellular salt levels draw water from your blood, and guess what happens when that water-depleted blood gets processed by the cpu? The cpu says, "You're dehydrated, take water". But all the water is still there! It just moved from your blood system into the cell system. Your brain did it's job, and registered the water level drop.

Nutrients are continually read by the cpu the same way. That's why you, and pregnant mothers especially, with a highly nutrient-demanding developing fetus, get 'cravings'. It ain't the food, it's the nutrient. Ice cream (calcium), pickles (potassium (salt)), etc.

Even a change in the nutrient level, not necessarily a drop to critical levels, gets processed by your noggin'.

Eat a ton of turkey, taters, stuffin', and a ton of other grub at Thanksgivin', or CHRISTmas, and where do you find yourself 2 hours after gettin' up from the table? Back in the kitchen, pickin' at the bird.

Hungry? Of course not. The cpu just registered a drop in the nutrient and sugar levels after 2 hours. The half-life of a super-saturated system (blood) is VERY short. You just THINK you're hungry.

Discipline yourself. Don't be a

Last edited by TRS-80 vet : 11-Feb-2008 11:28 AM.
johnnyburst79's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 4,562 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Experience: In what? ;)
11-Feb-2008, 11:05 AM #8
Not all neighborhoods have access to truly healthy foods and access to weight control activities. Some are obese from birth due to the diet of the mother and as the food education is lacking immediately as to what is "healthy" for a growing boy or girl. That's when you end up with a baby looking like this:



Is it all the parents fault? Possibly. Could it be from a lack of nutritional alternatives? Possibly. Not all places in America have wealth and excessively poor neighborhoods are more inundated with fast food and less healthy foods. Healthy food is undoubtedly more expensive than unhealthy foods. Schools also play a part in both gym class and other health related courses.

From some, it may not be a choice but a lifestyle bred into them since birth without their knowledge.

Drafting legislation against the individual and citizen is wrong. Put legislation against the owners of corporations who profit from the MSG injected, fat laced, flavor enhanced, pre processed then processed foods. Put in tax break bills for corporations that will offer free health classes to the morbidly obese. Write legislation against insurance companies who continue to insure the obese as a drain to society.

Putting legislation against the citizen in a place where 66% of society is obese is not a positive way to fight against the obesity epidemic.
__________________
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
-Thomas Jefferson
__________________

Please support me in my ride against Diabetes
iltos's Avatar
Community Moderator with 13,448 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sierra Madre, CA
Experience: Beginner
11-Feb-2008, 11:12 AM #9
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRS-80 vet View Post
Fat is a behavior of choice.
there's truth in this for many, but most health officials feel there a genetic component, as well.

don't really matter as far as this topic, tho.....

what's the next step?....ration food to people whose ratio of body fat to mass is too great?
institutionalize them?
clhcpa's Avatar
Senior Member with 1,299 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Experience: What I don't know, I figure out.
11-Feb-2008, 11:45 AM #10
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRS-80 vet View Post
Fat is a behavior of choice.

Eat less, lose weight. Eat more, gain weight. Yes, it's as simple as that. Otherwise, you've solved the energy crisis (and defied one of Newton's/thermodynamics laws)

Discipline yourself. Don't be a
You are a moron.

Quote:
Originally Posted by iltos View Post
there's truth in this for many, but most health officials feel there a genetic component, as well.

don't really matter as far as this topic, tho.....

what's the next step?....ration food to people whose ratio of body fat to mass is too great?
institutionalize them?
Thank you. Not all obese people are there by choice. Many, many factors weigh in (no pun intended). To lay it all at their doorstep is cruel.
ChrisJones's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 3,423 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wales, UK
Experience: I'd Like to say Einstein but I'm not....
11-Feb-2008, 11:48 AM #11
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyburst79 View Post
Not all neighborhoods have access to truly healthy foods and access to weight control activities. Some are obese from birth due to the diet of the mother and as the food education is lacking immediately as to what is "healthy" for a growing boy or girl. That's when you end up with a baby looking like this:



Is it all the parents fault? Possibly. Could it be from a lack of nutritional alternatives? Possibly. Not all places in America have wealth and excessively poor neighborhoods are more inundated with fast food and less healthy foods. Healthy food is undoubtedly more expensive than unhealthy foods. Schools also play a part in both gym class and other health related courses.

From some, it may not be a choice but a lifestyle bred into them since birth without their knowledge.

Drafting legislation against the individual and citizen is wrong. Put legislation against the owners of corporations who profit from the MSG injected, fat laced, flavor enhanced, pre processed then processed foods. Put in tax break bills for corporations that will offer free health classes to the morbidly obese. Write legislation against insurance companies who continue to insure the obese as a drain to society.

Putting legislation against the citizen in a place where 66% of society is obese is not a positive way to fight against the obesity epidemic.
Nice post.
LANMaster's Avatar
Community Moderator with 43,627 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central USA
Experience: Need no stinking badges
11-Feb-2008, 12:06 PM #12
Quote:
Originally Posted by linskyjack View Post
And conservatives want to give more control to state legislatures?

Twisting this obvious liberal legislation against Republicans, eh?


Further proof that modern liberalism is based in Fascism.
LANMaster's Avatar
Community Moderator with 43,627 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central USA
Experience: Need no stinking badges
11-Feb-2008, 12:07 PM #13
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyburst79 View Post

The legislation is designed so that this person will be able to sue McDonalds for serving him lunch.


Stupid fascist liberals
Sarge's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 2,468 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: City of the Lost Towers
Experience: getting there
11-Feb-2008, 12:08 PM #14
Whats next, banning cancer patients from buying cigarettes?
johnnyburst79's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 4,562 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Experience: In what? ;)
11-Feb-2008, 12:10 PM #15
Quote:
Originally Posted by LANMaster View Post
The legislation is designed so that this person will be able to sue McDonalds for serving him lunch.


Stupid fascist liberals
LAN, your idea is just plain wrong and an ignorant statement. That suit was already tried as someone ate McD's or Burger King everyday for every meal tried to say it was their fault he was fat. It failed.
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who help people like you solve computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.



Thread Tools


You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:51 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.