Right now: Live recording of the Tech Support Guy Show!
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
access audio avg avg 8 blue screen boot bsod computer connection cpu crash css dell desktop dma driver drivers dvd email error excel explorer firefox firefox 3 freeze gimp graphics hard drive hardware hijackthis hjt install internet internet explorer itunes keyboard laptop macro malware monitor motherboard network networking outlook outlook 2003 outlook 2007 outlook express php pio problem problems router seo server slow sound sp3 spyware trojan usb video virtumonde virus vista vundo windows windows vista windows xp winxp wireless
Civilized Debate
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > Community > Civilized Debate >
Neo-Conservatism: End Stage Syphilis?


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

 
Thread Tools
linskyjack's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 22,219 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
23-Feb-2008, 02:47 PM #1
Neo-Conservatism: End Stage Syphilis?
This is the Yang to the right wing talk radio based neo-conservative thread: Liberalism: A Mental Illness. WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Mulderator's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 49,758 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
23-Feb-2008, 03:13 PM #2
Quote:
Originally Posted by linskyjack View Post
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
I think you have end stage syphillis.
linskyjack's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 22,219 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
23-Feb-2008, 03:23 PM #3
Hey Mulder, can't you take a joke.
Mulderator's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 49,758 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
23-Feb-2008, 04:21 PM #4
Quote:
Originally Posted by linskyjack View Post
Hey Mulder, can't you take a joke.
My reply WAS a joke. I think you've got a few year before your Syphillis reaches end stage!
Bastiat's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 2,955 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
23-Feb-2008, 04:27 PM #5
Quote:
Originally Posted by linskyjack View Post
This is the Yang to the right wing talk radio based neo-conservative thread: Liberalism: A Mental Illness. WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Quote:
Originally Posted by linskyjack View Post
Hey Mulder, can't you take a joke.
Is this an example of the infamous "dry humor" of linsky that I've been reading about?

Last edited by Bastiat : 23-Feb-2008 04:43 PM.
bomb #21's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 5,494 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The void AKA edge of the Fens
Experience: I bent my wookie :(
23-Feb-2008, 04:29 PM #6
Quote:
Originally Posted by linskyjack
This is the Yang to the right wing talk radio based neo-conservative thread: Liberalism: A Mental Illness. WHAT DO YOU THINK?
I think ... it's doubtful that this is the yang to that other thread, syphilis being a physical illness 'n' all.

Plus, if these guys are anything to go by, I'd say it's unlikely that your average neocon gets much on the basis of looks.

Wasn't there a thread once about the attitude of hard-right types being down to psychological damage caused by repressed upbringing? That might be a better angle.
__________________
"Love All The People."
Bill Hicks, 1961 - 1994 -- R.I.P.

"I am against religion because it teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world."
Richard Dawkins

"OK, one last time. These are small... but the ones out there are far away. Small ... far away ..."
Father Ted
linskyjack's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 22,219 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
23-Feb-2008, 04:42 PM #7
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomb #21 View Post
I think ... it's doubtful that this is the yang to that other thread, syphilis being a physical illness 'n' all.

Plus, if these guys are anything to go by, I'd say it's unlikely that your average neocon gets much on the basis of looks.

Wasn't there a thread once about the attitude of hard-right types being down to psychological damage caused by repressed upbringing? That might be a better angle.
Well young man, mental illness is a physical illness, it involves the brain. I guarantee you that if you MRI'ed the two lawyers brains (or what is left of them) you would find areas in the cortex that were not functioning properly. To your point, yes, most of these wingers are damaged as youth-----totally repressed. Thats why so many of them are involved in perverted sexual behavior and great hypocrisies. Rumor has it that Senator Craig's MRI shows many "hot spots" particularly in the area of the brain that controls primitive behavior.
__________________
Green
valley's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 18,864 posts.
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Experience: ...just enough to know better
23-Feb-2008, 06:15 PM #8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bastiat View Post
Is this an example of the infamous "dry humor" of linsky that I've been reading about?
no, its called "deadpan humor". Hard to pull off in the written word but he seems to be able to do it. You never know if he's being serious or not..unless its too blatent to miss (like this thread)!
poochee's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 49,593 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Experience: Intermediate
23-Feb-2008, 06:40 PM #9
Quote:
Originally Posted by valley View Post
no, its called "deadpan humor". Hard to pull off in the written word but he seems to be able to do it. You never know if he's being serious or not..unless its too blatent to miss (like this thread)!
Paquadez's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 5,183 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London UK
23-Feb-2008, 06:53 PM #10
Syphilis progresses through three stages: Primary, where a chancre appears at the spot where the spirochete bacterium enters the body of the sufferer: secondary, where spots appear.

Both stages appear to die down.

The tertiary stage causes all sorts of nasty tissue destruction and usually affects the brain tissue and produces insanity.

Howard Hughes's insanity was caused by tertiary syphilus.

Therefore the OP's proposition enjoys medical integrity, but now requires empirical demonstration.

Have leading NeoCons consorted with whores?

Well, they regularly sup with lobyists!

__________________
Retreated To Relative Sanity!


linskyjack's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 22,219 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
23-Feb-2008, 06:57 PM #11
Yes indeed, when not on the subject of Israel, Mr. Paquadez is usually right on. The Neo-Con is the consort of the lobbyist, that is why they break out in boils when anyone wants to damper the power of the corrupters.
BDACBT's Avatar
Computer Specs
Senior Member with 312 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Outside barbed-wire around Atlanta
Experience: Enough to be dangerous
23-Feb-2008, 08:17 PM #12
My wife asked if I wanted to go to the movies tonight and I said no. I honestly think some of the "debate here", for lack of a better word, is far more entertaining than anything showing at the theater. Do you guys come up with this on the fly or is this being pulled from a long-lost Lenny Bruce manuscript?
valley's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 18,864 posts.
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Experience: ...just enough to know better
23-Feb-2008, 11:47 PM #13
Quote:
Originally Posted by linskyjack View Post
Well young man, mental illness is a physical illness
this is debatable (among other things you've said).
Mulderator's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 49,758 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
24-Feb-2008, 12:12 AM #14
Quote:
Originally Posted by valley View Post
this is debatable (among other things you've said).
Hasn't been debatable for years my dear (at least not by psychiatric professionals). Diseases like manic depressive illness, schizophrenia, are clearly and indisputably chemical organic illnesses that respond only to medication.
Paquadez's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 5,183 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London UK
24-Feb-2008, 05:25 AM #15
Quote:
Originally Posted by linskyjack View Post
Yes indeed, when not on the subject of Israel, Mr. Paquadez is usually right on. The Neo-Con is the consort of the lobbyist, that is why they break out in boils when anyone wants to damper the power of the corrupters.
I pose a simple question, intended as open and honest debate and not meant to start any pointless argument about Israel: neither is this intended to be "anti" anything.

Since you quite obviously feel the US NeoCon movement and NeoCons reprehensible, with which I completely agree, how do you personally reconcile the absolute reality that so many of the current gang of NeoCons (who are steering US policy and particularly US Foreign Policy) are fervent and committed Zionists?

The two realites cannot equate.

__________________
Retreated To Relative Sanity!


Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:55 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.