[Littlefield]

Originally Posted by bill.aam

The thing to remember is after Hillary Clinton lost the primary, she became sooo yesterday. Now, why you liberals still have your panties in a bunch, and why Gov. Palin still scares you so much is beyond explanation...

Yep I bet Hillary is soorry she gave up being a Senator

[poochee]

Palin's settlement doesn't address tax issues
By BRETT J. BLACKLEDGE and ANNE SUTTON
The Associated Press
Friday, February 27, 2009; 7:19 AM

JUNEAU, Alaska -- Gov. Sarah Palin's agreement to reimburse the state for trips her children took at government expense does not address potential tax problems she might face for charging Alaska thousands of dollars for their travel, lawyers handling the settlement said.

Palin already is drafting changes to her 2007 and 2008 tax returns, spokesman Bill McAllister said. This comes after learning that she is responsible for taxes on personal use of a state vehicle and nearly $18,000 she improperly collected as expenses from the state while staying at her Wasilla home about 40 minutes from Anchorage.

Palin now will show those benefits as income for tax purposes. Lawyers negotiating a settlement over state payments for her children's travel said Thursday they did not consider whether Palin also should include that benefit as income in her taxes.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...022700140.html

[jmosmith]

Originally Posted by poochee

Palin's settlement doesn't address tax issues
By BRETT J. BLACKLEDGE and ANNE SUTTON
The Associated Press
Friday, February 27, 2009; 7:19 AM

JUNEAU, Alaska -- Gov. Sarah Palin's agreement to reimburse the state for trips her children took at government expense does not address potential tax problems she might face for charging Alaska thousands of dollars for their travel, lawyers handling the settlement said.

Palin already is drafting changes to her 2007 and 2008 tax returns, spokesman Bill McAllister said. This comes after learning that she is responsible for taxes on personal use of a state vehicle and nearly $18,000 she improperly collected as expenses from the state while staying at her Wasilla home about 40 minutes from Anchorage.

Palin now will show those benefits as income for tax purposes. Lawyers negotiating a settlement over state payments for her children's travel said Thursday they did not consider whether Palin also should include that benefit as income in her taxes.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...022700140.html

Now if that ain't just a shining example of a fiscally-conservative, conservative taking "personal-responsibility",... then I don't know what is!!!...

Any chance she made a public admition of error, or apology?

...oh who cares.

PAILIN AND QUAIL, 2012!!!...

[jmosmith]

Originally Posted by bill.aam

The thing to remember is after Hillary Clinton lost the primary, she became sooo yesterday. Now, why you liberals still have your panties in a bunch, and why Gov. Palin still scares you so much is beyond explanation...

"[Bill], you ignorant slut." -- Dan Akroyd

[linskyjack]

By the way, were any of your invited to the Bristol-Levi shot gun wedding?

[poochee]

Originally Posted by linskyjack

By the way, were any of your invited to the Bristol-Levi shot gun wedding?

Nope.s

[Wino]

Originally Posted by linskyjack

By the way, were any of your invited to the Bristol-Levi shot gun wedding?

I believe my invitation was lost in the mail. I did so want to go.

[poochee]

Originally Posted by Wino

I believe my invitation was lost in the mail. I did so want to go.

s

[AKAJohnDoe]

Undoubtably, the trailer court was not large enough to hold everyone who wanted to attend.

[Sarge]

Originally Posted by AKAJohnDoe

Undoubtably, the trailer court was not large enough to hold everyone who wanted to attend.

Yooooo dawg, Did you get your invite? I heard my man, Um ohhhh, I mean the President be jammin, um I mean, has "entertainment" scheduled weekly at the Crib er um I mean, at the White House. BYOB Baby!

[AKAJohnDoe]

The vast majority of invites were probably lost in the meth lab fire.

[poochee]

There are certain jobs where smart women strive for a conservative not glamorous appearance...Maybe the Reps shouldn't have done the make-over on Palin?

New study suggests hot Sarah Palin should dowdy down for 2012
Posted by Andrew Malcolm on March 5, 2009

But the finding, being published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, does conform with previous research that found attractive women in high-status jobs were perceived as less competent...Kind of like all blondes are dumb.

Both outcomes would seem to strongly indicate there's more to the glass ceiling for females than the actual glass. No news to them.

According to Nathan Heflick, a psychologist and one of the research authors, it wasn't Palin's appearance per se that turned off the research subjects.

"It was the effect her appearance had on their perception of her competence and humanity," Heflick said. "Those variables made people less likely to vote for her."

Excerpts from: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/wash...rah-palin.html

[Sarge]

Originally Posted by poochee

There are certain jobs where smart women strive for a conservative not glamorous appearance...Maybe the Reps shouldn't have done the make-over on Palin?

New study suggests hot Sarah Palin should dowdy down for 2012
Posted by Andrew Malcolm on March 5, 2009

But the finding, being published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, does conform with previous research that found attractive women in high-status jobs were perceived as less competent...Kind of like all blondes are dumb.

Both outcomes would seem to strongly indicate there's more to the glass ceiling for females than the actual glass. No news to them.

According to Nathan Heflick, a psychologist and one of the research authors, it wasn't Palin's appearance per se that turned off the research subjects.

"It was the effect her appearance had on their perception of her competence and humanity," Heflick said. "Those variables made people less likely to vote for her."

Excerpts from: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/wash...rah-palin.html

It was the UNFAIR LIBERAL MEDIA that effected the perception of her competence, PERIOD.

So what the idiots in the stroy above are saying is maybe the reps should have made her look uglier. That is the way she looks. She is a beautiful woman, so freeeekin what. So what wouldve been better if she was ugly or a democrat? Or an ugly democrat.

[poochee]

Originally Posted by Sarge

It was the UNFAIR LIBERAL MEDIA that effected the perception of her competence, PERIOD.

So what the idiots in the stroy above are saying is maybe the reps should have made her look uglier. That is the way she looks. She is a beautiful woman, so freeeekin what. So what wouldve been better if she was ugly or a democrat? Or an ugly democrat.

Of course you read this as a slam. It is actually constructive but you wouldn't understand that. As a woman who was in a management job for many years, I know more about this than you do. And as usual you slam the Democratic women. But both Dems and Rep women in high political positions know how to dress and make-up for their job. Business is business. If the Reps were smart they would have under-played her looks. But as we know they weren't smart. Wonder if they ever picked up the designer clothes from her that she had bagged and ready to go.

[AKAJohnDoe]

Originally Posted by Sarge

It was the UNFAIR LIBERAL MEDIA that effected the perception of her competence, PERIOD.

That is just too funny.