Quote:
Originally Posted by LANMaster Quote: |
UnoAmerica is an Alliance of Latin-American Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs), created to defend democracy and freedom, both currently in danger in our continent.
| Clipped from here
Like it or not, there is no way in hell that anyone is going to convince me that Zelaya isn't a Communist who was attempting a coup of his own against the legitimate Honduran Democratic government.
Obama is backing the wrong horse .... AGAIN.  |
you'd rather he back the aspirations of Unoamerica, huh? It's president and founder is
Alejandro Peña Esclusa...in light of Buffo's post about anti-semitic remarks that Zelaya is alleged to have made, you may be interested in learning a bit more about this man.
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alejand...C3%B1a_Esclusa translated from italian
Quote:
Excluding Alejandro Peña (1954) is a Venezuelan politician, leader of the Fuerza Solidaria.
In 1998 he ran for president in Venezuela, collecting a total of 2424 votes equal to 0.04%.
Member of the sect "Tradition, Family and Property", pro-fascist movement, which allows entry only to those who prove to be of pure Aryan race.
|
fwiw, i cannot confirm this assertion of it's connections to nazisim, and the source is virulantly opposed to TFP and Pena....so take it with a grain of salt.
Pena has been a member of "Tradition, Family and Propery" since the 80's, according to
this journalist....during the 80s, the sect is said to have organized attacks
Quote:
|
against John Paul II during his trip to Caracas November 13, 1984, and the President of the United States of America, Ronald Reagan, after which the sect was outlawed in Venezuela , France, Spain and Argentina, countries where it was most entrenched.
|
the sect felt that neither reagan nor the pope took a strong enough stand against communism
the TFP group is a right end of the Catholic spectrum
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/american-society
i'd imagine some of their politics you support, LAN: i can only hope that learning a bit more about Unoamerica and it's president will allow you to see that things are not as simple as they seem
Unoamerica's concerns are indeed noble
Quote:
UnoAmerica will design economic programs to promote industrialization and development in our continent, in order to help solve the oldest and most serious problems in our region – poverty, illiteracy and even hunger -- as an antidote to totalitarianism.
Poverty and illiteracy are the main barriers to the consolidation of democracy and freedom in Latin America . There are no other real obstacles to development in a region full of resources.
We invite all democratic forces in Latin America to join this initiative. We invite them to work together to promote a better future in which freedom, social justice, solidarity and integration, and the rule of law will prevail.http://www.unoamerica.org/unoPAG/qui...php?idioma=ING |
but in '07, Pena is quoted
here as saying
Quote:
|
"only the military is capable of guaranteeing democracy and all opposition to the leftist Latin American governments betray their electorate by preventing the military to regain control of the continent."
|
.....which to me, brings some of the other comments on the Unoamerica site into a different, less noble light
the site, as you might expect, it very critical of the socialist movement in latin america -as characterized by the
Sao Paulo Forum- and the reasons for Unoamerica's support of Micheltti's military coup become clear when you read more of it's arguments.
Quote:
|
To achieve their goals, the members of the Sao Paulo Forum do not resort to firing squads to eliminate their enemies, as was done in Cuba by Fidel Castro, the most prominent founding member of the FSP. They now use more modern and sophisticated methods. One basic process is through constitutional reforms that allow them to control all three branches of power, and to remain permanently in the Presidency. Elections are rigged and voting secrecy is, in practice, eliminated.
|
and yet, the FSP
Quote:
|
noted, however, there is a marked contradiction between the fiery and quasi-revolutionary rethoric about "socialism of the XXIst Century" indulged in sometimes by many FSP's leaders, and the plain fact that the positions of power held by such leaders depend, on most cases, on their holding positions in governments which have emerged through the electoral road[6] |
so it not nearly so clear that what Unoamerica bases its activities on is a universal reality among leftist governements in the region.
Unoamerica does assert this, and it is the truth
Quote:
|
The FSP has a transnational project that disregards national borders or sovereignty. To achieve their goals, FSP members intervene in the internal affairs of other countries, funding candidates of their liking, supplying military equipment, and even making decisions on internal conflicts using related organizations such as the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR). Democratic political and social forces, on the other hand, have so-far limited their action to their own national territory.
|
then again, if you read
this, it's clear that there isn't some sort of "communist conspriacy" at work, but an ongoing and sometimes heated debate among the governements of latin america to find a place in the political and economic world of the 21st century...a place that is determined by the leaders of latin america, and the people who vote for them, not by outside intervention.
which has gotta make you wonder about Pena's belief that the military is the only way to bring democracy and freedom to the region.....it has been tried by latin american militaries and american foreign policy for a century....is it any wonder that many of the leftist governments there feel
Quote:
|
None of our countries will be able to triumph on its own: the socialist revolution must spread throughout all of Latin America
|
and that some feel
Quote:
|
The Sao Paulo Forum should ratify its rejection of intervention and aggression against the countries of Latin Americahttp://links.org.au/node/495 |
?
you reap what you sow.
Unoamerica's desire to sow more of the same will not reap anything different....if you are really worried about a nuke in latin america, it's worth considering.....especially considering the sources of money down there.