[Stoner]

Originally Posted by aka Brett

You didnt come up with anything in search huh.
So once again show where I said to limit the president choice by means of legal restriction.
Search jack................................Search you ole hound.....and please let your next response be results of these searches.

I'll ask you again.....how do you intend to impose legal restriction barring people from government appointments on the basis of religion?
This is not an issue of the President's choice, it's an issue of limiting the President's choice......and that is your argument.
I think you have a Constitutional problem to address and it's obvious you dodge it because you likely don't have an answer.

[aka Brett]

While jack searches feverishly for posts that dont exist,,,here is a little reading to occupy the time meanwhile

Originally Posted by Stoner

Most appointments are likely tokenism of some manner.

Personally.....I think it was politically stupid to be placing followers of Islam into security positions at this time.
.

[Stoner]

Originally Posted by aka Brett

While jack searches feverishly for posts that dont exist,,,here is a little reading to occupy the time meanwhile

I'll ask you again.....how do you intend to impose legal restriction barring people from government appointments on the basis of religion?
This is not an issue of the President's choice, it's an issue of limiting the President's choice......and that is your argument.
I think you have a Constitutional problem to address and it's obvious you dodge it because you likely don't have an answer.



( I have it hot keyed )

[aka Brett]

here is an image taken of jack in action....notice he isnt making it far

[Stoner]

Originally Posted by aka Brett

here is an image taken of jack in action....notice he isnt making it far

s

[aka Brett]

[Stoner]

Movie time

catch you guys later

[Drabdr]

Originally Posted by Stoner

Movie time

catch you guys later

Wait... what's on the screen tonight?

[iltos]

Originally Posted by Drabdr

Here's a start....

http://www.excellenceintransition.or...emNumber=10019

officially, Napalitano appointed both
for those concerned about "playing it safe", shora is small potatoes, serving here....and is one of 27 (the bios of all 27 are there)
he's the first muslim, and frankly, it seems about time
i can't imagine, frankly, that obama was real involved in that one.

it looks like alikan's appointment to assistant secretary of policy development was timed to coincide with obama's appointment of heyman as assistant secretary of policy....hard to imagine that obama wasn't involved in that pick.

[buffoon]

Originally Posted by aka Brett

Did I call you a left?
No

Originally Posted by buffoon

Jeez Brett that is really sad. You couldn't find a better way of self self-disqualification than to quote this "source"
Daniel Pipes of all people. How pathetic can you get?

Originally Posted by aka Brett

You lefts will discredit anything.....I mean anything...that why I dont provide many links its a waste...isny anything wrong with Pipes

If you weren't calling me you shoulda said "dem lefts"

[aka Brett]

dem der lefts

[buffoon]

Originally Posted by aka Brett

dem der lefts

dem der darn lefts

[Drabdr]

Originally Posted by iltos

officially, Napalitano appointed both
for those concerned about "playing it safe", shora is small potatoes, serving here....and is one of 27 (the bios of all 27 are there)
he's the first muslim, and frankly, it seems about time
i can't imagine, frankly, that obama was real involved in that one.

it looks like alikan's appointment to assistant secretary of policy development was timed to coincide with obama's appointment of heyman as assistant secretary of policy....hard to imagine that obama wasn't involved in that pick.

Good observations.

[aka Brett]

Dont tell me no one is home from church yet

[buffoon]

Originally Posted by aka Brett

Dont tell me no one is home from church yet

Just returned from burning one (plus a mosque, plus a synagogue)