There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
black screen blue screen boot bsod computer connection crash css dell display driver drivers email error explorer firefox firefox 3 hard drive internet internet explorer itunes laptop lcd malware monitor network networking nvidia outlook outlook 2003 outlook express password printer problem problems ram router security slow software sound sprtcmd.exe trojan usb video virus vista windows windows xp wireless
Digital Photography & Imaging
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > Software & Hardware > Digital Photography & Imaging >
5 megapixels? -sample photo please-


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
inane5's Avatar
Member with 91 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Texas
13-Jan-2004, 05:05 AM #1
5 megapixels? -sample photo please-
Anyone got a 5 megapixel camera? Can you post a picture taken in 5 megapixels (or link it) so I can see if getting 5 MPix is worth it? Give me a good one that really tests the quality

-inane5
hewee's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 51,870 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: *Random People Pleaser***Sacramento
Experience: Having fun
13-Jan-2004, 05:13 AM #2
slipe's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 6,474 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Tampa Bay
13-Jan-2004, 12:07 PM #3
Here are a couple of pages of sample 5Mp photos:
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2003_...0_samples.html
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2003_...1_samples.html

You need to view them at 100%. According to your screen resolution you won’t be able to tell the difference between a 2Mp or even 1.3Mp image and a 5Mp one if you let IE resize it to fit the screen. Tools>Internet Options>Advanced and under Multimedia remove the check from “Enable Automatic Image Resizing”. You are wasting your time if you don’t do that.

The extra pixels are useful for printing – especially if you crop the image a lot. I have two 5Mp cameras and a 4Mp. I have a wide format photo printer and if I don’t crop the image at all the best 13 X 19 I can get from a 5Mp image is 135 PPI, which isn’t as good as a higher pixel image would be. So 5Mp isn’t really good enough for my needs. If you are sure you would never print larger than 4 X 6 then 5Mp would be a waste of money and memory space.

A 3Mp image displayed on screen is going to look just as good as a 5Mp, even with some cropping. Some cameras are better than others. There are issues like noise, chromatic aberration, lens distortions etc that make one image better than another independent of the number of pixels.
__________________
if you can keep your head while others around you are losing theirs then there is something you don't know
Moby's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 8,750 posts.
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Not by the sea
13-Jan-2004, 01:19 PM #4
I'm in complete agreeance with Slipe. I think the true test of what the difference looks like, or a difference that you can actually plainly see, would be to print out an A4 size for example, pic taken at 5mp and compare it to one taken at 2 or 3mp which you could do from the same camera. I think the differences in sharpness or crystal clarity are the things that would jump out at you. I have a 4mp camera and have experimented myself. While the differing results on screen are unremarkable (adequately passable may be a better way of describing it) the differences in print must be seen to be fully appreciated.
Alex Ethridge's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 5,373 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Birmingham, Alabama USA
Experience: 14 years of hard knocks
13-Jan-2004, 02:08 PM #5
Well, I guess it's already been said; but, I'll support others' statements. You cannot see the difference on a computer mnonitor between a 300K picture and a 5 Meg picture.

You gotta' print it to tell the difference.

If your end product is for web use, a 300k camera will give you all the quality you can see on a web page.

If your final product is for viewing on a computer monitor in your home, 640x480 will do fine.

It is when you get into the printing of the pictures that the number of pixels begins to shine. I have a friend who is what I think the best wedding photographer in my city (of about 2 Million). He went entirely digital about two years ago and he shoots with the Fuji S2, a six-megapixel camera.

Personally, I use a 3-Meg camera, the Fuji S602z, and on very close examination, I can see the difference between his 8x10 prints and mine; but, I am satisfied enough with mine that I'm not considering trading it in for quite a while.

If you really want to do a comparison on how much difference more and fewer pixels makes, it has to be a direct comparison to be accurate--same subject, same camera, same distance, same lighting, same shutter speed, same aperture, tripod (for steadiness), different resolutions.

I used to shoot pictures of full sheets of newspapers to test my lenses. And to eliminate possible differences in accuracy of focus in processing and differences in photo printing papers, I shot with Kodachrome 25 slide film and projected them on a smooth wall for comparisons.

The point is that any meaningful comparison has to be done scientifically with a procedure that can be duplicated. Just asking to see someone's 5-Meg picture won't give you what you need. (How do you know the person who made it didn't have goo on his lens, or the jitters.) You have to see a group of photos and you have to know they were all made under identical conditions, with only the resolutions being different.
Davebomb's Avatar
Member with 36 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
13-Jan-2004, 09:44 PM #6
You can zoom in on a picture with Windows XP picture viewer, Photoshop, or Paintshop Pro and surely others. Keep track of the resolution of the different pics and zoom equally to compare them. It's kind of sloppy, but that method has worked for me. When a pic is viewed at larger than 100% I don't believe there is distortion in any program. Scaling in factors of two seems to prevent distortion in Photoshop, and probably other apps. 25%, 50%, 100%...
inane5's Avatar
Member with 91 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Texas
13-Jan-2004, 10:15 PM #7
wow. thanks slipe. the sony p10 is actually one of the things I've got my eyes on... no wait, the p92. I think I've ruled out the p10 since it's almost exactly the same as the p92 but 100 bucks more. I think it's going to come down to the p72 or the p92.

-inane5
Closed Thread

THIS THREAD HAS EXPIRED.
Are you having the same problem? We have volunteers ready to answer your question, but first you'll have to join for free. Need help getting started? Check out our Welcome Guide.


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who help people like you solve computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.



Thread Tools


You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.