There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
access audio avg avg 8 bios blue screen boot bsod computer connection cpu crash css dell desktop dma driver drivers dvd email error excel explorer firefox firefox 3 freeze gimp graphics hard drive hardware hijackthis hjt install internet internet explorer itunes keyboard laptop macro malware monitor motherboard network networking outlook outlook 2003 outlook 2007 outlook express pio problem problems router seo server slow sound sp3 spyware trojan usb video virtumonde virus vista vundo windows windows vista windows xp winxp wireless
Do It Yourself Projects
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > General Technology > Do It Yourself Projects >
Using a diplexer with cable internet and sattelite TV


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

 
Thread Tools
deh's Avatar
deh deh is offline
Distinguished Member with 7,931 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: 192.168.1.1
08-Mar-2006, 05:02 PM #1
Using a diplexer with cable internet and sattelite TV
I have cable internet access and direct tv. I want to be able to bring my tv to the room where my computer is (thus cable modem) but i want to only have 1 coax running into my house. With the use of a diplexer i can accomplish this (or so i've read never tried though). So the cable internet coax and the direct tv coax will connect to the diplexer outside or would this be a multiswitch on the outside?, then one line will go through 1 hole drilled in my house (so i don't have to drill two holes or make the existing one bigger). Then it will plug into a diplexer in the house and then that will "split" the lines allowing 1 coax to goto my tv box and 1 to my cable modem.

Has anyone tried this?

Is this how it is done and if so are there any issues like speed, dropped connections, interference?
Is there a better way but remember i don't want two holes.

Last edited by deh : 08-Mar-2006 05:10 PM.
gotrootdude's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 9,627 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Myrtle Beach SC (paradise)
Experience: Intermediate
09-Mar-2006, 03:18 PM #2
I don't really understand what your saying, but, if it answers your question, I have a standard 8 way splitter on my cable coming into the house, then another splitter in each bed-room to split the cable between a HTPC plugged and a RF modulator hooked to the TV's, and the cable modem works fine with it. As I figure it, the cable has been split 8X2 or 16 times, and the cable modem still works.

Make sure you use the correct quality cable if your making a cable run longer than 50 feet. Use RG8, RG11 instead of RG6 or RG58, it's a bit more expensive, but well worth it. Also, use terminators on any unused outlets.
__________________
4C6574206D65206B6E6F7720696620796F752063616E207265616420746869732E00

"The first job of a true patriot is to question the Government"

Thomas Jefferson

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for any assumption of power. The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters ... but they mean to be masters. "

Daniel Webster

Last edited by gotrootdude : 09-Mar-2006 03:29 PM.
gotrootdude's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 9,627 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Myrtle Beach SC (paradise)
Experience: Intermediate
09-Mar-2006, 03:24 PM #3
Edit:

I think I understand you now..

The diplexer might work, if it allows passive bidirectional communication in the same frequencies that the modem uses. Only way to tell for sure is to try it.

According to googled sources, people have tried what your talking about with mixed results. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't. It depends on what frequencies your cable services provider uses.
__________________
4C6574206D65206B6E6F7720696620796F752063616E207265616420746869732E00

"The first job of a true patriot is to question the Government"

Thomas Jefferson

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for any assumption of power. The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters ... but they mean to be masters. "

Daniel Webster

Last edited by gotrootdude : 09-Mar-2006 03:36 PM.
deh's Avatar
deh deh is offline
Distinguished Member with 7,931 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: 192.168.1.1
09-Mar-2006, 04:00 PM #4
Thanks. To clarify or actually with how bad my drawing is it could make things worse here is a drawing:

Did you get from you google that it is a multiplex switch i should use on the outside and a diplexer on the inside?

I realize a mere splitter will not work because i will be sending both satellite and cable signals through 1 line at one point (line that goes from inside to outside).

so as my drawing is trying to say two line are on the outside go into a device (multiplex switch?) then one line goes in the house , the one line goes into a diplexer and then it splits back into two lines, one going to the TV and one to the cable modem.
Attached Thumbnails
using-diplexer-cable-internet-sattelite-drawing.jpg  
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:27 PM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.