Mourning the loss of our friend, WhitPhil.
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
Search
 
General Security
Tag Cloud
access audio black screen blue screen boot bsod connection crash dell desktop driver dvd email error excel excel 2003 firefox hard drive hardware hijackthis internet keyboard laptop malware monitor network networking outlook problem processor ram recovery router safe mode slow sound spyware tdlwsp.dll trojan upgrade vba video virus vista vundo windows windows 7 windows vista windows xp wireless
Search
Search for:
Tech Support Guy Forums > Security & Malware Removal > General Security >
Question about anti-virus false positives

Tip: Click here to scan for System Errors and Optimize PC performance
[ Sponsored Link ]

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
tomdkat's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 5,019 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area, CA
Experience: Intermediate
20-Apr-2008, 01:55 PM #1
Question about anti-virus false positives
So, I installed the latest free version of Avast! on a XP machine I have laying around. On this machine, I've got AVG free edition, Ad-Aware, Spybot S&D, AVG anti-spyware, Windows Defender, and ZoneAlarm installed and running. This machine hardly gets used so the concern over it getting infected with something is low.

I installed Avast! to check it out. It scanned the hard drive and found a "Bookworm" file had been infected with a "Win32:Inject" trojan horse. AVG and none of the other above mentioned apps (excluding the firewall, of course) reported anything about this infected file.

So, I went to the free supoort forum for AVG free edition and read the sticky thread on what to do if you have a file you think is infected. In that thread, it says to scan the file using Jotti's malware scanner. If it's infected, e-mail the file to AVG and they will analyze it. Cool.

So, I upload the file to Jotti's scanner and it scans the file using a plethora of anti-virus scanners, a few of which are frequently mentioned and recommended here (e.g. AVG, Avast!, Kaspersky, NOD32, etc). The scan results from Jotti indicate Avast! and Sophos both detected a trojan horse while NONE of the other scanners detected anything.

When I first scanned the system using Avast! and it found the trojan horse, I thought" "cool, Avast really is as good as people say." After seeing the results above, I'm wondering if that was the case or if I'm dealing with a false positive.

My questions:
  1. How does one go about verifying if any reported infection is an actual infection or a false positive?
  2. Is it odd that 2 out of 20 anti-virus products would identify a trojan? At first, I thought "Ok, maybe it's something new." So, I did a Google search on "Win32:Inject" and found discussion going back to 2007 and one page claims a variant was detected back in 2006. Given how long it's been around, I began to wonder why only 2 anti-virus scanners would detect it given how long it's possibly been around.
Your thoughts?

Peace...
Elvandil's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 36,830 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vermont
20-Apr-2008, 01:59 PM #2
Where is this supposed infection?
tomdkat's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 5,019 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area, CA
Experience: Intermediate
20-Apr-2008, 04:32 PM #3
The actual trojan identified by Avast! is Win32:Inject-EC. The infected file is C:\Program Files\iWin.com\Bookworm Deluxe\Bookworm.ifm. That is the file I uploaded to Jotti's scanner site.

I chose NOT to move it to a quarantine or anything to keep it around where other A/V apps I might install could find it.

Peace...
lunarlander's Avatar
Computer Specs
Senior Member with 1,329 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
20-Apr-2008, 07:31 PM #4
To see if it is a false positive, deinstall and reinstall 'bookworm' and see if a good 'bookworm.ifm' will trigger Avast.
tomdkat's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 5,019 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area, CA
Experience: Intermediate
20-Apr-2008, 11:58 PM #5
Great idea! I'll give that a whirl.

Peace...
Elvandil's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 36,830 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vermont
21-Apr-2008, 12:36 AM #6
Often, unusual file endings are used by programs to store configuration information, game scores, etc. If it's not too large, try opening it with Notepad. If it's just a text file, then it's harmless.
tomdkat's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 5,019 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area, CA
Experience: Intermediate
21-Apr-2008, 01:32 AM #7
Another great idea! I'll do that in the morning.

Getting back to one of the original questions, what's a good way (if any) to determine if a reported infection is, in fact, a false positive or not?

Peace...
Elvandil's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 36,830 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vermont
21-Apr-2008, 02:26 AM #8
I'm satisfied that it is a false positive if one other up-to-date scanner finds no virus.
Closed Thread Bookmark and Share

THIS THREAD HAS EXPIRED.
Are you having the same problem? We have volunteers ready to answer your question, but first you'll have to join for free. Need help getting started? Check out our Welcome Guide.

Smart Search

Find your solution!



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who want to help you solve your computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.

Thread Tools


You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2009 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.