So, I installed the latest free version of Avast! on a XP machine I have laying around. On this machine, I've got AVG free edition, Ad-Aware, Spybot S&D, AVG anti-spyware, Windows Defender, and ZoneAlarm installed and running. This machine hardly gets used so the concern over it getting infected with something is low.
I installed Avast! to check it out. It scanned the hard drive and found a "Bookworm" file had been infected with a "Win32:Inject" trojan horse. AVG and none of the other above mentioned apps (excluding the firewall, of course) reported anything about this infected file.
So, I went to the free supoort forum for AVG free edition and read the
sticky thread on what to do if you have a file you think is infected. In that thread, it says to scan the file using
Jotti's malware scanner. If it's infected, e-mail the file to AVG and they will analyze it. Cool.
So, I upload the file to Jotti's scanner and it scans the file using a plethora of anti-virus scanners, a few of which are frequently mentioned and recommended here (e.g. AVG, Avast!, Kaspersky, NOD32, etc). The scan results from Jotti indicate Avast! and Sophos both detected a trojan horse while NONE of the other scanners detected anything.
When I first scanned the system using Avast! and it found the trojan horse, I thought" "cool, Avast really is as good as people say." After seeing the results above, I'm wondering if that was the case or if I'm dealing with a false positive.
My questions:
- How does one go about verifying if any reported infection is an actual infection or a false positive?
- Is it odd that 2 out of 20 anti-virus products would identify a trojan? At first, I thought "Ok, maybe it's something new." So, I did a Google search on "Win32:Inject" and found discussion going back to 2007 and one page claims a variant was detected back in 2006. Given how long it's been around, I began to wonder why only 2 anti-virus scanners would detect it given how long it's possibly been around.
Your thoughts?
Peace...