Dear Elvandil,
You seem to have opened up a can(Big Time) of worms,simply by posting the article!

It means that you have endorsed the opinion of the author!!
Quote" Anti-virus is dead.
Well, maybe I shouldn’t say dead, because there are still some people that use it" Unquote. "Some people", man, is he joking or what? It would be a disaster if people stopped using A-Vs, simply because all those signature based viruses(the old ones)
leave alone the new ones in the wild which "are" contained by A-Vs will cripple the systems!
In the same breath, the author okays the use(encourages) of A-V scans! From where did the A-V scans get info'(database) about viruses?
What about "pro-active defense" which is akin to sandboxing a virus if detected and rupturing the malware code, before it enters the system?
A firewall is only as good as it is configured! Is the setting"recommended" or "High"? Are the users really reading the "help" section provided?My guess is most people are happy with the fact that a firewall is installed!
I thank you for the info' about the setup.exe and the size of the exe. files as indicators of a virus.
"Even downloading software from the developer’s site could be dangerous." This is news to me!
I am flabbergasted!

