| Member with 301 posts. THREAD STARTER | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: NW of Toronto Experience: Intermediate |
15-May-2006, 02:55 PM
#14 |
Hardware (Verifying DMI etc) 1 > were all previous partitions on the 80 gig drive deleted and was it repartioned before cloning the smaller drive to it?
I re-formatted this drive completely (several times!). I used just one partition to 'Maximum size'. However, even though it is an 80Gb drive, it told me that 10.xxx was all there was available (I may have the wording wrong, but this is the gist of it), instead of the expected 80Gb. However, when it reads in 'My Computer' (at one time or another since re-formatting) it says it's 78Gb or so, so as far as I can see, this is not a problem. However, maybe this is where it is going wrong? 2 > does the 6 gig drive with the two OS's have multiple drives or partitions -- or are you seeing two different operating systems on the same drive? The latter really shouldn't happen unless XP was installed incorrectly on a previous Win98 installation.
From what I said above, you will see that there is/should be only ONE partition. Where and why this Windows.098 FOLDER (I guess) comes from, I don't know. This info was cloned from a Win98 disk several years ago. I would like to get rid of all references to Win98. Like you say, this shouldn't really happen, and I don't know where the two 'systems/folders' came from. 3 > how old is the Norton Ghost application that was used to do this? If very old, it may not have adjusted the fat32 cluster size of the 6 gig drive to properly match the 80 gig drive.
The Norton Ghost program is only 2005, so it should be OK. I had several attempts at doing this, since it wasn't installed on this disk. I installed just Ghost and found that copying disk to disk wasn't an option. I installed the whole thing and then it became operable.
One other point - at first I formatted as per 'format c:/s' and then realized that, since I was using a Win98 floppy disk to get into the program, I was copying Win98 sys info to the HD. Subsequently, I omitted the ---'/s' part, but still I couldn't get any further.
Does that clarfy the problem a bit better?
John
Mon May 15th 2006 - 14:54EDT |