Live Chat & Podcast at 1:00PM Eastern on Sunday!
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
Search
Hardware
Tag Cloud
access acer asus bios bsod computer crash desktop driver drivers error ethernet excel freeze gaming hard drive hardware hdmi internet laptop malware memory modem monitor motherboard network printer problem ram registry router security slow software sound toshiba trojan ubuntu 11.10 uninstall usb video virus vista wifi windows windows 7 windows 7 32 bit windows 7 64 bit windows xp wireless
Search
Search for:
Tech Support Guy Forums > Software & Hardware > Hardware >
Solved: RAID 0 HDD question re: performance

Reply  
Thread Tools
av8ur's Avatar
Computer Specs
Member with 62 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Experience: Intermediate
19-Nov-2009, 02:52 PM #1
Solved: RAID 0 HDD question re: performance
I have recently installed Win7 to my old WinXP system, and I ran the Windows Experience Index tool on my system. All of the rankings were 7.0 to 7.2, except for the Data Transfer Rate which is 5.9. The pertinent equipment in my system is as follows:

ASUS M3A32-MVP mobo
AMD Phenom 9600 quad core CPU
4GB Corsair DDR2-1000 RAM
2 Western Digital Velociraptor 10,000 rpm HDD's

The concern I have is that even though these are not the newest top of the line hardware, I have always been under the understanding that with my hard drives set to RAID 0, and with them having the higher RPM rating, that the data transfer rate would be on the high end of the index. 5.9 on the index seems too low in comparison to the rest of my hardware.

The ultimate question is, could it be possible that a RAID 0 configuration may actually be working slower than if I were utilizing one of the hard drives as a stand alone drive without a RAID 0 configuration? Thoughts/tweaks/etc.... Thanks.
av8ur's Avatar
Computer Specs
Member with 62 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Experience: Intermediate
19-Nov-2009, 03:30 PM #2
Ah, perhaps I have found the answer. In re-reading the Index statistics, it appears that the test also ran across my D: drive, an extra hdd in my system I use for storage. It is a standard WD 7,200 rpm drive. That may well explain it.
Compiler's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 5,701 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dallas
Experience: Advanced
19-Nov-2009, 03:31 PM #3
RAID 0 is usually not much faster for a desktop system - a waste of money and of course higher chance of failure and data loss.

The index doesn't tell you the ACTUAL performance of the system. Just more of a general crap / good / great...

My $65 (today) ATI 4670 video card ranks at 6.8 (3D & Gaming)... high by Win7 standards... lower-mid-range by gaming standards.

My 7200RPM 500GB drives are a 5.5... but in the real world, they max out at about 100mb/s (avg 65). My Quad and of course any modern AMD X2~X4 CPU would stomp your "7.x" CPU into the ground, but its still a 7 by MS index.

If you want a higher number.... you'll need something like SSDs.

Whatever... its a ranking performance score. It has little value.
__________________
FREE PC Software, safe to use. Please use these to help us help YOU.
PC Wizard System Info on Hardware & temperatures. AVG AntiVirus & ZoneAlarm Firewall.
Try the Opera 11 Web Browser today! Easier, Safer & Cleaner; unlike IE 8 or IE9
Compiler's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 5,701 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dallas
Experience: Advanced
19-Nov-2009, 03:32 PM #4
No, about your #2 HD. It says "primary hard drive"
crjdriver's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 25,867 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Reno, NV
19-Nov-2009, 05:14 PM #5
If you are using the onboard raid, I would really get rid of it. The SB600 chipset used on that board is pretty poor for raid. I always tell people that if they really really want raid, then buy a real raid card.

As an example, my system scores a 7.5 on primary hard disk. It is a single WD "Black" series drive w/32meg of cache. SATA mode is set to ahci.
__________________
Microsoft MVP Desktop Experience
av8ur's Avatar
Computer Specs
Member with 62 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Experience: Intermediate
19-Nov-2009, 09:19 PM #6
I pretty much figured that the Index is mostly a guideline, it just seemed odd that it showed my other hardware right up there with the best of them, but the data transfer rate being low. And when you pull up the statistics for the index test, it actually shows 'both' the primary and the secondary 'D:' drive. But, thanks for the info.
Reply

THIS THREAD HAS EXPIRED.
Are you having the same problem? We have volunteers ready to answer your question, but first you'll have to join for free. Need help getting started? Check out our Welcome Guide.

Search Tech Support Guy

Find the solution to your
computer problem!




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who want to help you solve your computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.
Thread Tools



Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter TechGuy.tv TechGuy.tv Mobile TSG Mobile
You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 PM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2011 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.

Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.