Mourning the loss of our friend, WhitPhil.
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
Search
 
Linux and Unix
Tag Cloud
access audio blue screen boot bsod connection crash dell desktop driver dvd email error excel excel 2003 firefox hard drive hardware hijackthis internet keyboard laptop malware monitor motherboard network networking outlook problem processor ram recovery router screen slow sound spyware tdlwsp.dll trojan upgrade vba video virus vista vundo windows windows 7 windows vista windows xp wireless
Search
Search for:
Tech Support Guy Forums > Operating Systems > Linux and Unix >
Solved: Red Hat 8 on Large (120GB) drive

Tip: Click here to scan for System Errors and Optimize PC performance
[ Sponsored Link ]

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
reccenav's Avatar
Junior Member with 2 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Omaha NE
Experience: Intermediate Beginner Linux, Advanced Networking
21-Sep-2004, 02:13 PM #1
Unhappy Solved: Red Hat 8 on Large (120GB) drive
We have a vendor installing WebSphere service in our organization. We have talked them into using Linux for the servers. The problem is that the application is only compatible with Red Hat 8's kernel version. Initially installed Fedora Core 2 (waiting for our purchase of RHEL) and everything went fine. I went back with a clean install of RH 8 and now get a kernel panic (no init found). I know that the problem is the large drive ( a Western Digital 120GB) drive. What and how do I pass information to the kernel to get it to boot, and then what configuration do I need to modify so it boots ok in the future. Thanks for any help.

Derek
reccenav's Avatar
Junior Member with 2 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Omaha NE
Experience: Intermediate Beginner Linux, Advanced Networking
21-Sep-2004, 04:00 PM #2
Smile RH 8 on Large drive
We figured out the problem. The fedora version was loaded using the 2.6 kernel and the partition table that I just attempted to reuse and reformat was unreadable by the older version. Did a low level format on the drive and everything is working now.
saikee's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 2,835 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Newcastle
Experience: A Linux user gone nuts on multi-boot
21-Sep-2004, 05:50 PM #3
If you are using a SATA then that will be it. Kernel 2.6 supports SATA automatically but lower versions need the SATA driver.

Many distros have 2.6 kernel now. The latest Red Hat is version 9 and my kernel version is 2.4.20-8 which doesn't support SATA automatically.

What is wrong of using FC2 as it is just a modern Red Hat?
Squashman's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 14,983 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 1265 Lombardi Ave
Experience: IIAHYAYCESA,YAADA!
21-Sep-2004, 11:08 PM #4
I agree, use RH9. Red hat 8 sucked. If you want to use an earlier release of Red Hat, I recommend using 7.2 or 7.3.
Whiteskin's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 2,051 posts.
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alberta, Canada
Experience: Windows: Decent. Unix/Linux: Advanced +1
27-Sep-2004, 09:26 PM #5
Or, just use a modern linux with an old kernel. That'd work too.
Closed Thread Bookmark and Share

THIS THREAD HAS EXPIRED.
Are you having the same problem? We have volunteers ready to answer your question, but first you'll have to join for free. Need help getting started? Check out our Welcome Guide.

Smart Search

Find your solution!



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who want to help you solve your computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.

Thread Tools


You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2009 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.