some more for the sheer hell of it. Again, no point making a new thread.
ProFTPD is a highly configurable FTP daemon written from scratch for
Unix and Unix-like operating systems.
This advisory addresses two security problems:
1. ProFTPD was not forward resolving reverse-resolved hostnames. A
remote attacker could explore this vulnerability[1] to bypass ProFTPD
access control lists or have false information (client hostname)
logged. It was discovered by Matthew S. Hallacy
<poptix@techmonkeys.org>.
2. A DoS vulnerability[2] was found by Frank Denis. By sending a
malicious command to the server, a remote attacker could force the
process to consume all CPU and memory resources available to it.
Multiple attack instances could effectively bring the server down.
This update also fixes a Segmentation Fault problem, found[3] by
Mattias <surre1@hotmail.com>, which was further analyzed and
considered by the developers as not exploitable
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/advisor...sory-1793.html
There are some insecure permissions on configuration files and
executables with the bind 9.x packages shipped with Mandrake Linux 8.0
and 8.1. This update provides stricter permissions by making the
/etc/rndc.conf and /etc/rndc.key files read/write by the named user and
by making /sbin/rndc-confgen and /sbin/rndc read/write/executable only
by root
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/advisor...sory-1794.html
The use of LD_PRELOAD can make a program with privileges given by LIDS
execute attackers code. This mean that a root intruder can get every
capability or fs access you configured LIDS to grant. Moreover, if you
granted CAP_SYS_RAWIO or CAP_SYS_MODULE to a program, an attacker could
deactivate LIDS and thus, access any file.
In some configurations, this also lead to users being able to become root.
(there must be a program granted CAP_SETUID which is not setuid)
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/advisor...sory-1795.html
Updated namazu packages are available for Red Hat Linux 7.0J. These
packages fix cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. It also fixes a possible
buffer overflow
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/advisor...sory-1796.html
The pine port, versions previous to pine-4.44, handles URLs in
messages insecurely. PINE allows users to launch a web browser to
visit a URL embedded in a message. Due to a programming error, PINE
does not properly escape meta-characters in the URL before passing it
to the command shell as an argument to the web browser.
The pine port is not installed by default, nor is it "part of FreeBSD"
as such: it is part of the FreeBSD ports collection, which contains
over 6000 third-party applications in a ready-to-install format. The
ports collection shipped with FreeBSD 4.4 contains this problem since
it was discovered after the release.
FreeBSD makes no claim about the security of these third-party
applications, although an effort is underway to provide a security
audit of the most security-critical ports.
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/advisor...sory-1797.html
The webmail frontend IMP has a cross site scripting problem, allowing
a remote attacker to send you an E-mail with a malformed URL that when
clicked on will open your mail session to the attacker, allowing him
to read and delete your E-mails.
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/advisor...sory-1798.html
Slash, the code that runs Slashdot and many other web sites, has a
vulnerability in recent versions that allows any logged-in user to
log in as any other user.
This allows users to take nearly full control of a Slash system (post
and delete stories, posting stories, edit users, post as other users,
etc., and do anything that a Slash user can do) by logging in to
an adminstrator's Slash account.
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/advisor...sory-1799.html
Regards
eddie