Mourning the loss of our friend, WhitPhil.
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
Search
 
Linux and Unix
Tag Cloud
access audio black screen blue screen boot bsod connection crash dell desktop driver drivers dvd email error excel excel 2003 firefox hard drive hardware hijackthis internet keyboard laptop malware monitor motherboard network networking outlook problem recovery router safe mode screen slow sound spyware trojan upgrade vba video virus vista vundo windows windows 7 windows vista windows xp wireless
Search
Search for:
Tech Support Guy Forums > Operating Systems > Linux and Unix >
considering Linux as OS

Tip: Click here to scan for System Errors and Optimize PC performance
[ Sponsored Link ]

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
ims's Avatar
ims ims is offline
Junior Member with 25 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canada
26-Apr-2002, 01:57 PM #1
considering Linux as OS
-RANT-
Since MS has in their Divine Wisdom decided to terminate support for lesser versions of their OS, and I am not willing at this time to upgrade my two-year-old computer to Win XP, I have been considering Linux as an OS.
-END OF RANT-

I am running Win 98SE on a P3-500.

There are considerations:

1) dual-boot system

2) only Linux: restricts what software I can download and install

3) what flavour of Linux?

4) download or off-the-shelf

I won't be making any changes until maybe the summer, but I want to plan ahead. So I'm welcome to any suggestions.

Thanks
codejockey's Avatar
Senior Member with 1,410 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
26-Apr-2002, 03:17 PM #2
I am running Win 98SE on a P3-500.
There are considerations:

1) dual-boot system

Doable, useful and desirable, IMHO. Trying to duplicate Windoze in Linux is an exercise in futility, if for no other reason than Microsoft can change things at will, and emulation/guest O/S software is always playing catch-up.

2) only Linux: restricts what software I can download and install

Absolutely right. Even though a great variety of software is available for Linux, if it's not the software you want/need, that point doesn't count for much.

3) what flavour of Linux?

A lot depends on what you consider important. Many newcomers to Linux quite reasonably choose a distribution for ease-of-installation or similar considerations; SuSe, RedHat and Mandrake all shine here. Other users have specific requirements (must work with odd hardware or support real-time/embedded operation, for example) and choose other distributions. You can always try several distributions before deciding; check out www.cheapbytes.com for very reasonable prices on Linux distributions.

4) download or off-the-shelf

Download is great for trials and experimenting; I prefer off-the-shelf when I've chosen a distribution, because I want to be sure I have a hard backup of the official distribution. In theory, it makes no difference; in practice, the extra documentation included in the off-the-shelf distribution may pay for itself many times over. Note that off-the-shelf does not have to mean retail; it's possible to purchase official distributions on CD only for nominal prices.

Hope this helps.
__________________
The slowest component still sits at the keyboard.
Gibble's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 27,127 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Striking or Scoring
Experience: The Alpha and Omega
26-Apr-2002, 03:49 PM #3
Personally I like to download the linux ISOs from http://www.linuxiso.org and burn them on CD, then I have my backup copy and don't need to muddle making boot disks with dd, I just pop in the CD and boot from that to get the installation going (The most useful feature Linux and Windows have as far as installation goes).

I have bought a few linux books as reference but find I use the net more often since it tends to be quicker, and you can find tutorials for anything you could possibly want to do.

If you want a recommendation on distributions.

There are a few major distros that people use.
Mandrake is a snap to install (99% of the time)
Redhat is probably the most used, and you can find help specific to your distro the easiest (most books focus on redhat as well)
Slackware is what I use now, I don't know why, I was recommended it by several sysadmins and they love it (maybe it's more stable???).

--HTH
__________________
izme: You know...it's kind of nice to sit atop Civilized debate and look down below on all of the uncivilized master debating we are here...just out of the fight zone

Gibble: Now you know what it's like to be Canadian.
stnwerks's Avatar
Senior Member with 302 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SE Alaska
26-Apr-2002, 04:59 PM #4
ims,
I thought I'd let you know since your using 98se that you could use partition magic 5 an older version, I picked one up last week for under $20,and it works great !!! Also you might try Lycoris aka
redmond linux It was easier to install than win 98se, A little stripped down compared to other linux distros, but that makes it simple. have fun Steve
__________________
THE STONE CARVER
ims's Avatar
ims ims is offline
Junior Member with 25 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canada
26-Apr-2002, 08:37 PM #5
Thanks for all your replies. I will consider the suggestions made.

But I would like to hear of the experiences of those who now work only in Linux and whether they feel the restrictions all that greatly.
strawberry1's Avatar
Junior Member with 18 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2002
03-May-2002, 06:30 PM #6
hi......linux is great but if you are used to windows and youve used it for everything theres not much point getting rid of it at least not yet....why dont you try linux first then decide?
if youve never installed two os's at once before then i would recommend buying off the shelf so you get a book to help you, because you probably wont have net access until youve almost finished, make sure you write down all your hardware before you start because you will need all this info.

i installed redhat and it was easy to install and easy to use, but for work i use a lot of windows stuff so i had to dual boot with win 2kpro.

but if you dont need windows id say get used to linux then ditch windows.....linux is free and i dont like bill gates!
strawberry1's Avatar
Junior Member with 18 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2002
03-May-2002, 06:51 PM #7
also i heard that microsoft are phasing out support for their older versions and making new software incompatible because they are planning to make their newest version a subscription based affair....ie:you pay like forever to use it!
Closed Thread Bookmark and Share

THIS THREAD HAS EXPIRED.
Are you having the same problem? We have volunteers ready to answer your question, but first you'll have to join for free. Need help getting started? Check out our Welcome Guide.

Smart Search

Find your solution!



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who want to help you solve your computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.

Thread Tools


You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2009 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.