Mourning the loss of our friend, WhitPhil.
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
Search
 
Linux and Unix
Tag Cloud
access audio blue screen boot bsod connection crash dell desktop driver dvd email error excel excel 2003 firefox hard drive hardware hijackthis internet keyboard laptop malware monitor motherboard network networking outlook problem processor ram recovery router screen slow sound spyware tdlwsp.dll trojan upgrade vba video virus vista vundo windows windows 7 windows vista windows xp wireless
Search
Search for:
Tech Support Guy Forums > Operating Systems > Linux and Unix >
format external hard drive to ext4

Tip: Click here to scan for System Errors and Optimize PC performance
[ Sponsored Link ]

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
namenotfound's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 2,546 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New York
Experience: no man can be my equal
01-Mar-2009, 08:02 PM #1
format external hard drive to ext4
I have Ubuntu 8.10 with ext3 filesystem, and I have two questions.

1, Is it possible to format an external hard drive to ext4, considering my operating system doesn't use ext4.

2, If I do format my external hard drive to ext4, will I be able to read/write with it on my ext3 system?


OR am I just better off formatting the external hard drive to ext3?
__________________
404: Name Not Found
Don't PM me questions, that's what posts are for
My Favorite Editors: Windows: Crimson Editor | Mac: Smultron | Linux: gPHPEdit
RootbeaR's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 4,606 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Experience: Getting it
01-Mar-2009, 08:44 PM #2
Quote:
Originally Posted by namenotfound View Post
I have Ubuntu 8.10 with ext3 filesystem, and I have two questions.

1, Is it possible to format an external hard drive to ext4, considering my operating system doesn't use ext4.

2, If I do format my external hard drive to ext4, will I be able to read/write with it on my ext3 system?


OR am I just better off formatting the external hard drive to ext3?
This is Linux.

You can format it however you like.


FWIW majority of my music is on NTFS partition (ripped before I started using Linux).

I mount it from my ext3 formatted PCLOS install and play using Amarok.
atkail's Avatar
Junior Member with 18 posts.
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
04-Mar-2009, 03:03 PM #3
Yeah, it really doesn't matter which you choose if it's just for storage.
Elvandil's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 36,830 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vermont
04-Mar-2009, 03:15 PM #4
Are you guys sure about this? I'm no Linux expert by any means, but does Ubuntu contain file-system drivers for Ext4? If not, I don't see how the drive would be accessible to Ubuntu.

Ubuntu 9.04 and above has Ext4fs support, but I wouldn't expect any access from versions below that unless drivers were installed manually.
__________________
Microsoft MVP
Windows Shell/User
atkail's Avatar
Junior Member with 18 posts.
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
04-Mar-2009, 03:18 PM #5
Yes, they are native to most modern linux distros.
Elvandil's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 36,830 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vermont
04-Mar-2009, 03:37 PM #6
So you agree that Ubuntu before 9.04 will not be able to access the drive?
atkail's Avatar
Junior Member with 18 posts.
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
04-Mar-2009, 03:49 PM #7
What I'm saying is that they are native on most modern distros. While he may not have the driver on his 8.1 that does not mean that the ext4 wont have backwards compatibility on its end. If you think about it, it really does leave room for success. But I'm not absolutely sure until I try it myself.
atkail's Avatar
Junior Member with 18 posts.
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
04-Mar-2009, 03:53 PM #8
Actually I just looked at the specs and it is 100% backwards compatible
Elvandil's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 36,830 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vermont
04-Mar-2009, 04:05 PM #9
OK. I'm not trying to start an argument, but I hope this discussion will be useful to the OP. He'll know, too, when he tries it.
atkail's Avatar
Junior Member with 18 posts.
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
04-Mar-2009, 04:21 PM #10
We're just talking, one professional to another. I respect your seniority, and I meant no disrespect. I was just trying to answer the question to the best of my knowledge. I hope he finds this information useful as well.
Elvandil's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 36,830 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vermont
04-Mar-2009, 04:27 PM #11
As I said, I'm no Linux expert (and I don't even like saying "Linux" as if it were an operating system instead of a kernel around which many OS's are built). But I do know that file systems need drivers. So I'm still wondering. If Ext4fs is accessible, then an Ext3fs driver must be able to do it.

I appreciate your professionalism.
__________________
Microsoft MVP
Windows Shell/User
atkail's Avatar
Junior Member with 18 posts.
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
04-Mar-2009, 04:37 PM #12
Np, I think (and this is just atkail's theory) that each retains compatibility of the previous version. Sort of a backwards key effect.
Elvandil's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 36,830 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vermont
04-Mar-2009, 04:42 PM #13
Yes, I agree and understand that part. But I'm just a bit unsure of what the definition of "backward-compatible" would be in this case. Does it mean that machines that can access Ext3 can automatically access Ext4? Or does it mean that all functions of Ext3 are retained in Ext4, that Ext4 can be used in place of Ext3, and so on, but only if the OS supports Ext4?

I'll be curious to see what happens when our OP tries this, or to hear from someone else who did.

It may be something like the newst versions of UDF for CD's. Though the files are located inside a UDF file format, there is extra data written to the CD so that machines with no UDF drivers can access the CD "as if" it were the standard ISO format. To an OS with no UDF drivers, the CD appears to be in ISO format but really isn't. It could be similar. That when the drive is accessed from an older version of "Linux", it "sees" the drive as Ext3.
__________________
Microsoft MVP
Windows Shell/User
atkail's Avatar
Junior Member with 18 posts.
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
04-Mar-2009, 04:48 PM #14
I'm hoping it would that it means machines that use ext3 could automatically use ext4. At least that's what the man pages are leading me to believe.

I know what you mean, my ears are perked a little bit too.
Elvandil's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 36,830 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vermont
04-Mar-2009, 05:18 PM #15
LOL. Well, he does come back eventually, and now can't say that no one paid any attention. There's plenty to read. And all we really came up with is, "Try it and see, but it will probably work.:
Closed Thread Bookmark and Share

THIS THREAD HAS EXPIRED.
Are you having the same problem? We have volunteers ready to answer your question, but first you'll have to join for free. Need help getting started? Check out our Welcome Guide.

Smart Search

Find your solution!



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who want to help you solve your computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.

Thread Tools


You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2009 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.