Mourning the loss of our friend, WhitPhil.
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
Search
 
Linux and Unix
Tag Cloud
access audio black screen blue screen boot bsod connection crash desktop driver drivers dvd email error excel firefox hard drive hardware hijackthis internet keyboard laptop malware monitor motherboard network networking outlook problem processor ram recovery router safe mode screen slow sound spyware tdlwsp.dll trojan vba video virus vista vundo windows windows 7 windows vista windows xp wireless
Search
Search for:
Tech Support Guy Forums > Operating Systems > Linux and Unix >
Compiling from source: have you ever done it?

Tip: Click here to scan for System Errors and Optimize PC performance
[ Sponsored Link ]

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
tomdkat's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 5,019 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area, CA
Experience: Intermediate
03-Mar-2009, 05:15 PM #1
Compiling from source: have you ever done it?
If you have ever compiled a complete and working application from source, what did you compile? This should be for apps you use frequently and we can exclude system level builds, like the kernel, glibc, GLIB/GTK+, X, and so on.

The apps I've most recently built from source, that I use frequently, on my 64-bit Ubuntu 8.10 system are:
  • Gimp 2.6.3 (and some supporting libs, like GEGL)
  • Pidgin (forget the version number)
  • Apache 2.2.6
  • PHP 5.2.5

In the past, I've built all kinds of stuff from source but haven't done so since installing Ubuntu.

As a side note, I've also built a gcc-4.3.2 based, 64-bit Linux hosted, 32-bit Windows targetted cross compiler that I haven't used since testing it out.

Peace...
isaaclewis's Avatar
Junior Member with 1 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Experience: Intermediate
03-Mar-2009, 05:50 PM #2
Qtel
I compiled Qtel, an Echolink VoIP client from source. It still has a few bugs, but it is a working compilation.
RootbeaR's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 4,606 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Experience: Getting it
04-Mar-2009, 12:24 PM #3
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdkat View Post
If you have ever compiled a complete and working application from source, what did you compile?
There once was a lad named Paul
Whom everyone thought had one ball
Until one day
We heard from Fay
The poor boy had no balls at all

I just compiled that.

P.S. He did have a wagon with one wheel and a one legged chicken to play with
__________________
"The only stupid question is the one not asked." Me
Empowered by Linux
"Software is like sex; it’s better when it’s free." Linus Torvalds
lotuseclat79's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 14,988 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: -71.45091, 42.27841
05-Mar-2009, 05:38 PM #4
Hi tomdkat,

Today I finally cracked the tork barrier in its configure script, and managed to find information on the Internet from (header file name) clues in the configure script for missing header files and libraries. Specifically, I found information on which package was missing in terms of what other packages it depended upon.

The author of tork only gave unspecific information on installing all the kde packages that contained either kde and dev or kde and lib in the package name - lots of those, but only needed just the one over and above the ones I already figured out from multiple attempts (exercisizing configure) to build tork from just the Live CD Kubuntu 8.10 environment with 2GB RAM. Over 1/2 GB was left after the build worked.

Haven't tested it yet, but the build got a return code of zero, i.e. echo $? after the make command - so, today, I am happy to have accomplished this moderately difficult task - i.e. out-of-date (& missing) information on building tork with earlier releases of KDE environment (3.5.x). This was done in the KDE 4.1.2 Live CD Kubuntu 8.10 release for tork version 0.31 - have to check to see if the src was actually 0.31-1 for which a .deb file is available - which may have been the easier way to install tork on Kubuntu. Nope: the version.h file only mentions 0.31 - but that might just be an oversight.

One technique I used, was to installed synaptic with apt-get, and then using synaptic I looked at dependencies (Properties tab) of an available earlier version (0.29) and recorded them. Turned out the missing package was not mentioned and depended on a package that was installed.

-- Tom

P.S. I have posted the procedure to configure/compile/install tork in the KubuntuForums.net Software Support subforum How to configure/compile/install tork source code for KDE 4.1.2 Intrepid Ibex.
__________________
The independence created by philosophical insight is - in my opinion - the mark of distinction
between a mere artisan or specialist and a real seeker after truth. - Einstein 1944
Imagination is more important than knowledge. - Einstein

Last edited by lotuseclat79 : 06-Mar-2009 12:31 PM.
Closed Thread Bookmark and Share

THIS THREAD HAS EXPIRED.
Are you having the same problem? We have volunteers ready to answer your question, but first you'll have to join for free. Need help getting started? Check out our Welcome Guide.

Smart Search

Find your solution!



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who want to help you solve your computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.

Thread Tools


You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:10 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2009 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.