Good morning, val (but not early enough on my part). Will share a few more anecdotes about Ben, but before I forget. lemme' ask you a few questions about this Quick Link thing (and you seem to know your way around this relatively new GUI).
What's "Social Network"? (Not selectable for me). What's "Open Contact's Popup"? What's "Social Groups"? What's "Miscellaneous"? (Also not selectable for me).
And before I get to anecdotes from Ben's emails, let me first address some things in your last post. Am reviewing that "Hey Ben from Western Canada" thread myself because I don't want to unnecessarily repeat anything in it.
I think Ben called that shack his "cabin", though from how he described it that thing was hardly a cabin to me. His calling it a cabin may have been from his days at sea, where a "cabin" on a ship is not the same thing that most of us think of as a "cabin". In fact, there was a post in that "Hey Ben from Western Canada" thread where he chastised me for calling it a "thing" and "unfinished" (I think it's on page 3 or 4 . . . it's right after his thumbnail image of what he first calls a "box"), and I think he finally called it his cabin there.
The closest he came to having someone care for him was a guy named "Howard", who was also the manager of the local cricket club and his landlord (well, Ben explained that Howard actually "let" him stay on the property in what was apparently a storage shed originally, in return for Ben's cricket score keeping and cricket web page . . . it's at
http://www.geocities.com/cowichancricket/. Ben didn't like Howard, but in his final days Howard apparently helped him some . . . Ben said of him "The 'Man' offered to empty my porta-potty (his heart is in the right place) but I declined". Ben called Howard "the Man", which I think was not a compliment.
I took a look at that cricket club web page I just gave you the link for, and I had expected to see some kind of tribute to Ben, or at least a mention of his passing. Nothing. Either I missed it, or else Ben's contempt for Howard may have been well placed.
There is a story to Ben and that laptop and his apparent displeasure over it because one of his sons did not come and get it. Well, actually Ben wasn't so much pissed at the laptop as angry with the son. I'll tell you that story sometime.
Ben always ran hot and cold. I think maybe he was manic-depressive. One day he would be on top of the world and the next day he would be down. I never knew which Ben to expect.
Yes, he certainly did have a way with the language . . . of which Winston Churchill, one of my favorites, said about the Americans and the Brits . . . "Two common cultures sharing a different language." That may not be an exact quote, but you get the idea.
Once in a while I failed to get what Ben was saying . . . sometimes he rambled on waxing poetic, and I have no idea what he was saying or what he was getting at. It was either so profound that it went over my head, or it was gibberish . . . probably a little bit of both. When he did that, I think maybe he was on his medication, or else was severely depressed. Sometimes he seemed very lucid and other times he seemed looped. (Of course, the line between genius and crazy is very fine.)
That brings me to another observation. Ben always maintained that he was clumsy when it came to women. But in his writing to you I see someone who was very deferential, kind, and poetic to women . . . NOT clumsy. Of course, we talked like two old bulls with remnants of testosterone, so I wouldn't have expected to see that side of him in our conversations. Clearly he held you in high regard. Ben was not gregarious to most, and he and I both shared a tendency to shy away from strangers, and picked our friends very particularly. So again, his choosing you as a friend was rare, unique, and meant that he held you in high regard. It is unlikely that "more people" would "know how special he was" because he didn't want to know "more people". Like myself, he gives most people a "grunt", and that's it.
He characterized himself as a "loner", and while I may be a little more gregarious than he was, we both commiserated on our mutual dim view of the human race in general (you excepted of course).
Perhaps more telling of our same but different opinions, he liked T.E. Lawrence (of "Lawrence of Arabia" fame), while I liked Winston Churchill. Both were contemporaries, and both knew each other and befriended each other. And both were brilliant (and here the analogy fails, because I'm definitely not brilliant). But Lawrence was a "loner" and dark and doom and gloomish, while Churchill was an optimist. Churchill is my guy, while Lawrence was Ben's guy.
If you follow that "Hey Ben from Western Canada" thread, you may get a sense of his depression toward the end of that thread.
Change gears for a minute . . .
I don't get what you mean by "I solved that problem by copy and pasting another person's words into my reply and then changing them to another color" when you spoke of your workaround to the forbidden formatting. I did see in one of your replies to Ben how you did the "What's" in blue. What's confusing me is that apparently if this thing detects any formatting it's rejected . . . so how did you "sneak" in formatting without this thing detecting it??
Now formatting for me isn't to make it look "pretty" (my wife's word for football passes). And where you used it for your replies to Ben's questions, it wasn't for that either I don't think (in spite of your abundant use of smilies . . . sorry, sarcasm crept into it there . . . just chalk it up to old and cranky). Formatting makes things easier to read. So it frustrates me that I can't get any formatting into these things. My stuff is generally lengthy anyway, so formatting helps organize it for the reader.
Yes, I was a teacher for about 5 years. I'm sure it has changed now because that was back in the late 70's and early 80's. Nevertheless, your daughter has a real challenge ahead of her, not so much because of the unruly behavior but because the education system is in bad need of repair, and a lot of the kids can't even read, much less study English Lit.
You mentioned that the local high school there had 400 students. In the highschool that I graduated from in 1965, Bishop Kenrick in Norristown, PA, a Roman Catholic highschool, there were 500 students IN MY GRADUATING CLASS ALONE. Sister Doris, the "Prefect of Discipline" had a permanent frown carved in her lips. She gave me plenty of detention slips for chewing gum in the hallway. Us boys had to wear a jacket and tie every day, and the gals had uniforms. Gals got sent home if their jumper skirt came up above their knees. While the Nuns and Brothers (Dominicans) were strict and rigid, I did in fact get a good education from them, which equipped me well for college later.
Would you have to get some kind of New York State "certification" to be a sub??
Well, this is already too lengthy, so I'll just tantalize you with one small excerpt from Ben's emails (I have 345 of them):
"my sight is definitely on the wane"
This from an email of his in August of 2007 (exactly a year ago). I've included this seemingly unremarkable comment of his because you can see in the "Hey Ben from Western Canada" thread a time when he switches to bolding (I think it's on page 5 or 6). That was because of his poor vision. In fact, about a month after that he began to ask me to put my characters in bold and make them 14 point. Then he asked me to do a light blue background (HTML code for that is f0ffe8) to make it easier to see.
Poor guy, his teeth (that's another story) and his vision were going.
OK . . . enough for now, This should get you through at least one cup of coffee.