Mourning the loss of our friend, WhitPhil.
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
Search
 
Networking
Tag Cloud
access audio black screen blue screen boot bsod connection crash dell desktop driver dvd email error excel excel 2003 firefox hard drive hardware hijackthis internet keyboard laptop malware monitor network networking outlook problem processor ram recovery router safe mode slow sound spyware tdlwsp.dll trojan upgrade vba video virus vista vundo windows windows 7 windows vista windows xp wireless
Search
Search for:
Tech Support Guy Forums > Internet & Networking > Networking >
Can both computers share Cricket connection?

Tip: Click here to scan for System Errors and Optimize PC performance
[ Sponsored Link ]

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
TinaSabrina's Avatar
Junior Member with 3 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
22-Dec-2008, 05:05 PM #1
Question Can both computers share Cricket connection?
First of all, hello to all and thanks for having this site to help people.

I have glanced around trying to see if my Q has already been answered but am finding myself so technologically challenged (dumb maybe! ) that I don't even understand a lot of the terms being used. So here is my question if anyone can help.

I have Cricket Internet. With this company you buy the little plug-in broadband modem. They want $120+ per modem (although some of their advertisement deceitfully implies you can get a new modem for $34- when I went to buy another one for the second computer we've gotten the guy said "Oh no, it's $120+ for the modem and thirty-four dollars per month to use it." )
So anyway, I was wondering if anyone can tell me how I can have both my computers sharing the Cricket connection while only having one plug-in modem? Somebody said something about a router . . . . .and then it was all Greek to me. We actually have 2 desktops and one old laptop, (almost forgot about it), and ideally I would like to have them all on the Cricket Internet without the expense of buying 2 more modems and having the additional $34 x 2 added to my monthly bill.

Thanks in advance for any help.
avisitor's Avatar
Computer Specs
Senior Member with 1,628 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Experience: Advanced
22-Dec-2008, 05:16 PM #2
Look at CradlePoint for a really tiny USB modem router.

The Kyocera KR2 is also nice.
cgullett's Avatar
Member with 31 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2008
22-Dec-2008, 05:20 PM #3
There are a couple of things you can do. Granted I'm sure you are aware of the speed you will be connecting at. Anyways on to the good stuff. They make a wireless router that you can plug your card into and it will broadcast a wireless signal and you would just connect to the wireless signal like you normally would. The second is inexpensive but requires a little computer knowledge. You would set up an ad-hoc network with Internet Connection Sharing (ICS).. Your second pc would connect to the pc with the broadband card, and use its internet connection to get out. The speeds are a little reduced, but you are connecting over a mobile card so you already know this . Let me know if you would like any help with setting up the ICS.....

Caleb
TinaSabrina's Avatar
Junior Member with 3 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
22-Dec-2008, 05:20 PM #4
Okay thanks Avisitor, that sounds like a good start. How many do I have to buy if I have a grand total of 3 computers in the house?

Thanks again.

Last edited by TinaSabrina : 22-Dec-2008 05:21 PM. Reason: Clarification of which person I'm responding to
avisitor's Avatar
Computer Specs
Senior Member with 1,628 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Experience: Advanced
22-Dec-2008, 05:21 PM #5
You'd only need one of the routers.

Look at what CradlePoint has to offer and see what fits your needs.
TinaSabrina's Avatar
Junior Member with 3 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
22-Dec-2008, 05:24 PM #6
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgullett View Post
There are a couple of things you can do. Granted I'm sure you are aware of the speed you will be connecting at. Anyways on to the good stuff. They make a wireless router that you can plug your card into and it will broadcast a wireless signal and you would just connect to the wireless signal like you normally would. The second is inexpensive but requires a little computer knowledge. You would set up an ad-hoc network with Internet Connection Sharing (ICS).. Your second pc would connect to the pc with the broadband card, and use its internet connection to get out. The speeds are a little reduced, but you are connecting over a mobile card so you already know this . Let me know if you would like any help with setting up the ICS.....

Caleb
Hmmm, okay. . . . . when you say 'card' are you referring to the Cricket modem or what exactly?
ShelterTech's Avatar
Computer Specs
Junior Member with 4 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Experience: Advanced
04-Jan-2009, 03:14 PM #7
Curiously watching
I'm hoping for a report from somebody who's actually using Cricket 3G through a router. If my current ISP flakes out, my two choices are AT&T 3g at $100/mo or Cricket 3G at $40/mo. Sharing among multiple computers wirelessly is a must, though all are low-demand (no music, no video, etc.). Cricket's "official" stance is that their broadband is for one computer only and I'm wondering if they have thrown up some obstacles we'll need to get over. Information like I've seen in this topic is hard to come by. Thanks for addressing the question.
avisitor's Avatar
Computer Specs
Senior Member with 1,628 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Experience: Advanced
04-Jan-2009, 03:26 PM #8
There's absolutely no reason why you couldn't use one of those routers for any mobile broadband.

ATT's is only $60, though
JohnWill's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 96,644 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South Eastern PA, USA
Experience: Advanced age & experience
04-Jan-2009, 04:03 PM #9
Here's one that claims to be compatible with a Cricket UTStarcom UM100 modem.

http://www.repeaterstore.com/product...3g-router.html

Perhaps if you told us the exact make/model of your modem we could be more help.
ShelterTech's Avatar
Computer Specs
Junior Member with 4 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Experience: Advanced
04-Jan-2009, 08:23 PM #10
Cricket sharing
This forum is a little confusing, it's not apparent who the posts are intended for.

I don't have Cricket or AT&T service - I may have to choose one if my current provider goes out of business, which is quite possible. The AT&T route is clear, but I'd rather not pay $100/mo. If the $40/mo Cricket service will do the job, that would be nice. Activation and return fees prevent testing it at this point.

The UTStarcom UM100 modem would be the one, but I'm looking at the possibility that "compatible" from the viewpoint of the router maker is not the same as "usable" from the viewpoint of Cricket. If it will work (without getting shut down by Cricket) then the MBR1000 looks like a good plan.

Edit to add: AT&T has lowered their prices. What's $60/mo now was $100 a month ago. Looking better!

Last edited by ShelterTech : 04-Jan-2009 08:45 PM. Reason: Edit for additional information
avisitor's Avatar
Computer Specs
Senior Member with 1,628 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Experience: Advanced
05-Jan-2009, 07:11 AM #11
It's more actual compatibility with the modem hardware than software. Most of these are just a PPP connection dialer.

You can try VZW's for 30 days if you'd like to see if it'll work for you. It's $60/mo with 30 day return policy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShelterTech
This forum is a little confusing, it's not apparent who the posts are intended for.
That's why we ask that you start your own thread for a problem instead of hijacking another.
__________________
Austin

Please refresh, I edit my posts often.
ShelterTech's Avatar
Computer Specs
Junior Member with 4 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Experience: Advanced
05-Jan-2009, 09:19 PM #12
Quote:
That's why we ask that you start your own thread for a problem instead of hijacking another.
Sorry, I thought I was continuing the existing discussion. Didn't intend to hijack one.
avisitor's Avatar
Computer Specs
Senior Member with 1,628 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Experience: Advanced
05-Jan-2009, 10:00 PM #13
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShelterTech View Post
Sorry, I thought I was continuing the existing discussion. Didn't intend to hijack one.
No sweat, don't worry about it. Generally, we like to keep it one problem per thread so we can best follow the comments.

Did you require any further assistance?
ShelterTech's Avatar
Computer Specs
Junior Member with 4 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Experience: Advanced
05-Jan-2009, 10:35 PM #14
Quote:
Did you require any further assistance?
I'm still hoping to hear from somebody who's actually used a router with the Cricket 3G service, but I should probably start a new thread. Thanks.
JohnWill's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 96,644 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South Eastern PA, USA
Experience: Advanced age & experience
06-Jan-2009, 08:55 AM #15
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShelterTech View Post
... but I should probably start a new thread.
Please do.
Closed Thread Bookmark and Share

THIS THREAD HAS EXPIRED.
Are you having the same problem? We have volunteers ready to answer your question, but first you'll have to join for free. Need help getting started? Check out our Welcome Guide.

Smart Search

Find your solution!



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who want to help you solve your computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.

Thread Tools


You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2009 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.