There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
access audio avg avg 8 bios blue screen boot bsod computer connection cpu crash css dell desktop dma driver drivers dvd email error excel explorer firefox firefox 3 freeze gimp graphics hard drive hardware hijackthis hjt install internet internet explorer itunes keyboard laptop macro malware monitor motherboard network networking outlook outlook 2003 outlook 2007 outlook express pio problem problems router seo server slow sound sp3 spyware trojan usb video virtumonde virus vista vundo windows windows vista windows xp winxp wireless
Reviews
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > General Technology > Reviews >
Symantec.


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

 
Thread Tools
aarhus2004's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 2,261 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Western Canada
Experience: Windows Millennium only
24-Nov-2005, 11:24 AM #1
Question Symantec.
Quote:
The operating uses the C:\_RESTORE folder structure for both system restore and system file protection. Any problems you might have had with system restore are almost certainly due to your having installed malware from Symantec. Symantec have not produced any worthwhile software and in that time have, by taking over the original companies, destroyed many fine products including Ghost and Partition Magic and through their LiveUpdate product destroyed many systems especially Win Me.
Mike Maltby
mike.maltbyatmail.com


Mike is an MVP and this post of his appeared in the Microsoft Public Newsgroups WindowsME System Tools. here
on the 19th.Nov.'05 in response to "Does the OS Make Mysterious Use of System Restore?"

The highlights are mine.

I understand Symantec has recently acquired Sygate also.
__________________
Java Runtime Environment Version 5.0 Update 16 see here. And download the latest MVP's Hosts File here. The latest (01-Jan-2008) thread ("For WinME Users Only") selected post summary #7 here.

Last edited by aarhus2004 : 24-Nov-2005 05:14 PM.
blues_harp28's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 7,716 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London England
24-Nov-2005, 03:44 PM #2
Hi..Thanks..good old Symantec..
WhitPhil's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 8,347 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Whitby, Ontario
24-Nov-2005, 04:23 PM #3
Total rubbish, and another unsubstantiated rant against Norton.

His implication is that Norton Software is Malware NOT that Norton installs malware!! I've seen nothing, anywhere that indicates a relationship between Norton and Restore problems. This MVP had the opportunity to enlighten us and chose to rant instead.

As well, note from the original post that they had 5 GBs in the restore files and were experiencing sluggish performance, and he uninstalled NSW which "supposedly" solved his shutdown problem. BUT, he then started to get Starup problems that eventually "went away".
Right!
Rollin' Rog's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 42,844 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North of Hollywoodland
Experience: I know when to fold em'
25-Nov-2005, 12:15 PM #4
There certainly can be no relationship between the problem with System Restore and Symantec. And the use of the term "malware" to refer to Symantec may be extreme. But then I've only had personal experience with one of their products: the NAV 2002 version that came preinstalled on my XP system.

It caused "symevent.sys" shutdown Blue Screens all too frequently, and continued to do so even after the "update" that was alleged to correct it.

Since uninstalling NAV about 2 years ago, I think I have had only one STOP error, either startup or shutdown -- as opposed to the one or two a week I was getting with NAV.
__________________
What The Dormouse Said

Donate

"Politicians, ugly buildings and whores all get respectable if they last long enough."
Rockn's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 17,888 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Mexico of the North, MN
Experience: Disenfranchised American Male
25-Nov-2005, 09:01 PM #5
Windows ME was wrecked the moment it shipped from the mother ship so I really doubt Symantec products could make it much worse. Peter Norton sold his company and products to Symantec in 1990, but Ghost has still been a great product with the exception of version 9. I really have no warm feelings for their AV product since it is bloated and far too intrusive unless you know what oyu are installing. Symantec also purchased Backup Exec from Veritas as well.
__________________
**Disclaimer** Anything below this line ^ is part of my signature for those that may be confused

Sadly, there are no integers on this scale, so your gangly adolescent attempt to be clever has proved futile....Dieter

I have the right "NOT" to be tolerant of others because they are different, weird, or tick me off.....Parody of Andy Rooney

There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots.
aarhus2004's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 2,261 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Western Canada
Experience: Windows Millennium only
30-Jan-2006, 12:27 AM #6
?
^^Bump^^
thecandyman's Avatar
Junior Member with 11 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
30-Jan-2006, 12:41 AM #7
LOL, how could Symantec have wrecked WindowsME? Like Rockn said WindowsME was ruined by Micro$oft and their haf a$$ programmers which unfortunetly are still being paid and employed because of Micro$ofts damn monopoy...*end rant*
talon03's Avatar
Computer Specs
Senior Member with 1,024 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Newtownards, N. Ireland
Experience: ....................Yeah sure why not.
30-Jan-2006, 06:50 AM #8
Windows is the most popular OS for a reason. Not because it's the best, but because its the easiest
ACTU's Avatar
Senior Member with 243 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New England
Experience: Enough to make me dangerous
30-Jan-2006, 10:08 AM #9
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhitPhil
Total rubbish, and another unsubstantiated rant against Norton.

His implication is that Norton Software is Malware NOT that Norton installs malware!! I've seen nothing, anywhere that indicates a relationship between Norton and Restore problems. This MVP had the opportunity to enlighten us and chose to rant instead.

As well, note from the original post that they had 5 GBs in the restore files and were experiencing sluggish performance, and he uninstalled NSW which "supposedly" solved his shutdown problem. BUT, he then started to get Starup problems that eventually "went away".
Right!

Ok then look at it this way. Norton is what something like 80 mgs big right? Now Norton also has to much garbage running in the back ground witch by the way sucks the heck out of the system. Pluse Norton does not catch as much junk like say AVG would. My self I rather have a product that works and my compter run faster then to have a program that requires as fee that does not perform.

Trust me my friend Norton is not cracked up to what they say they are.
__________________
I hate garbled tech support people that you can't understand on the telephone...
AntiM$'s Avatar
Member with 39 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Experience: Intermediate
30-Jan-2006, 01:56 PM #10
Quote:
Originally Posted by talon03
Windows is the most popular OS for a reason. Not because it's the best, but because its the easiest
Easiest to pirate, for sure!
ACTU's Avatar
Senior Member with 243 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New England
Experience: Enough to make me dangerous
30-Jan-2006, 02:27 PM #11
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntiM$
Easiest to pirate, for sure!

Until you get snagged
JohnWill's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 77,418 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South Eastern PA, USA
Experience: Advanced age & experience
31-Jan-2006, 08:03 AM #12
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntiM$
Easiest to pirate, for sure!
And that's the easiest way to get an exit pass from this forum.
AntiM$'s Avatar
Member with 39 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Experience: Intermediate
01-Feb-2006, 10:46 AM #13
Sarcasm. Serious business.
ACTU's Avatar
Senior Member with 243 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New England
Experience: Enough to make me dangerous
02-Feb-2006, 04:12 PM #14
Ok can we please get back to the topic at hand here?
Jay_JWLH's Avatar
Computer Specs
Senior Member with 345 posts.
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Zealand
Experience: Mainly self experienced
12-Feb-2006, 10:49 PM #15
Quote:
Originally Posted by talon03
Windows is the most popular OS for a reason. Not because it's the best, but because its the easiest
This depends on how well you know the OS. My opinion: Apple is good for easy use, but is generally incompatable (or at least less than Windows). Windows has many problems, as you may understand the more you own a computer. Although it has many drivers, it is already ready to get most of your hardware and probibly many other stuff working.

Edit: sorry, only read up to that qoute, then read the rest. Back to the topic then.
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 PM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.