Quote:
2006 Anti-Virus Software Report http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/ Gold BitDefender Silver PC-cillin Bronze AVG Anti-Virus
#4 McAfee VirusScan
#5 F-Secure Anti-Virus
#6 Norton AntiVirus
#7 F-Prot for Windows
#8 eTrust EZ Antivirus
#9 ESET Nod32
#10 Panda Anti-Virus
#11 AVAST! Pro |
TopTenREVIEWS changed their ratings...........
Anti-Virus Software Reviews 2006
Listed in order of rating:
Gold: BitDefender
Silver: Kaspersky
Bronze: F-Secure Anti-Virus
#4: PC-cillin
#5: ESET Nod32
#6: McAfee VirusScan
#7: Norton AntiVirus
#8: AVG AntiVirus
#9: eTrust EZ Antivirus
#10: Norman Virus Control
#11: AntiVirusKit
#12: AVAST!
#13: Panda Titanium
#14: F-Prot
#15: PCTools AntiVirus
#16: ViRobot Expert
#17: WinAntiVirus
NA CyberScrub AntiVirus
NA The Shield AntiVirus
After trying Kaspersky, even I came to the same conclusion that it's a good antivirus product.
EDIT: No point in starting a new reply, I'll just continue here....
Taking a closer look at TopTenREVIEWS ratings, I totally disagree with their commentary/analysis in regards to scanning time.
Scanning Time 80 GB HardDrive:
Gold: BitDefender Time: 20 Min
Silver: Kaspersky Time: 8 Min
Bronze: F-Secure Anti-Virus Time: 35 Min
#4: PC-cillin Time: 30 Min
#5: ESET Nod32 Time: 24 Min
There's no way Nod32 took 24 minutes to scan and BitDefender 20 minutes

. Nod32 is way faster. Kaspersky 8 minutes

. Nod32 is one of the fastest scanners out there! (Didn't try all antivirus software, but it's well noted among the antivirus community.) I just did a test.
TopTenREVIEWS probably made a mistake.....perhaps they will change it.....
Kaspersky documented in their help files (Frequently asked questions) regarding scanning times being somewhat long/slow. The more scans are conducted Kaspersky times start to get faster as stated in the help files because they skip files that have already been scanned (something to that effect). [Previous posts BD9, and I'll check the help files to see exactly what they say on scans.]
EDIT AGAIN:
Check this out......test conducted by PC World......(previously posted here in this thread)...
Apparently, the PC World comparison chart link I posted previously didn't work....the long way.. http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/artic...,124475,00.asp
Check each of the boxes (Compare) and click Compare (at the bottom).
Scan speed (in seconds):
BitDefender 9 Standard Time: 556 sec
McAfee VirusScan 2006 Time: 242 sec
Kaspersky Lab Kaspersky Anti-Virus Personal 5.0 Time: 420 sec
F-Secure Anti-Virus 2006 Time: 388 sec
Symantec Norton AntiVirus 2006 Time: 272 sec
Panda Software Panda Titanium 2006 Antivirus + Antispyware Time: 106 sec
AntiVir Personal Edition Classic 6.32 Time: 265 sec
Alwil Software Avast Home Edition 4.6 Time: 791 sec
Trend Micro PC-cillin Internet Security Security 2006 Time: 134 sec
Grisoft AVG Free Edition 7.1 Time: 354 sec
If TopTenREVIEW has Kaspersky at 8 minutes and BitDefender at 20 minutes,
then can somebody explain to me how PC World achieved in their test a difference of 136 sec = 2 minutes and 16 seconds!! 12 minutes difference on 80 GB Hard Drive vs 2 minutes and 16 seconds difference...... the spread does not look right - TopTenREVIEWS scan time for Kaspersky looks way too fast.

TopTenREVIEW - McAfee VirusScan time: 1 hour vs BitDefender time: 20 minutes (McAfee slower), yet PC World has McAfee faster at 242 seconds vs BitDefender's 556 seconds
Conclusion: There's no consistency in these tests.......
TopTenREVIEWS:
Gold BitDefender Time: 20 Min
Silver Kaspersky Time: 8 Min
Bronze F-Secure Anti-Virus Time: 35 Min
#4 PC-cillin Time: 30 Min
#5 ESET Nod32 Time: 24 Min
#6 McAfee VirusScan Time: 1 Hour
#7 Norton AntiVirus Time: 35 Min
#8 AVG AntiVirus Time: 24 Min
#9 eTrust EZ Antivirus Time: 30 Min
#10 Norman Virus Control Time 35 Min