Quote:
|
Originally Posted by telecom69 Well as to where are the unhappy members,a few of them have posted here.I ask if you have read post#1 of this thread?? its early days yet on this thread and it started up because of things posted here http://forums.techguy.org/site-comme...-tsg-down.html after post#15 and then the thread was split by Mike to this one ....No-one has said anything bad about Mods they do a great job in my opinion but if this site is getting bad reviews from the outside then someone is not doing much moderating in Random which I believe is the Forum under most criticism,from what I read ....I believe sincerely this is one of the most family friendly sites on the internet,and I care about its reputation ..... |
Well I agree with you on one point---TSG is family friendly , and I care about reputation also.
I read the PC magazine articles and the comments by the disgruntled, not impressed with the comments at all. You will ALWAYS have a number of people who will complain about everything, and with a site this big , with so many members , its to be expected.
Even in a work-place --100 employees for example, 15 will be whining about something and 5 ?, they will do everything possible to make the majority unhappy. Crybaby --tattlers--fault-finders-- and they have to mind everyones business. Impossible to please --and impossible to shut them up. That came to mind while reading the comments in article.
I will give example >>> "All good things come to an end, and the Tech Support Guy forums are no exception. What was once an excellent tech forum is now nothing more than a chat room" ---
this is totally false , and why read this persons comments any further?. This site is
best at tech help , expertise is outstanding , and few questions go unaswered, I cruise the tech sites , and someone is very lucky to even have posts answered at most of them.
In no way does Random --CD -- Game or any other forum lessen the quality of tech help here.
Here is another one >>> "With moderators that sexually pester female members, administrators unwilling to enforce rules and member cliques too quick to dismiss someone who doesn't fit exactly" --- foolishness. Flirtation , teasing , with members who are not offended. Time some lighten up and have some humor. Our moderators have never harrassed female members from what I have seen , and if one was uncomfortable , well--I know our mods and they would cease the teasing. Its nothing more than what goes on in workplace , and everywhere else.
I have also watched mods in action at other sites -- and our Mods don't abuse. Even in disagreement they don't use their status to bully.
Failure to enforce rules ? . I once stepped over line and was quickly given kick in pants by cookiegal !, had a vacation from TSG. She did exactly what was needed {my temper is not one of my strong points}

, and I still feel bad for causing her, a mod to take action--I greatly respect Cookie.
Cliques? . When I first came here , and ventured from security into CD, I hit some bumps , but was never made to feel unwelcome by most, in fact , quite opposite. In spite of differences in opinion, some fine folks who made me feel welcome.
Point is , some are going to be negative --sour grapes. My experience here does not match in any way what those people relate.
I am sure the mods get plenty of PM's from those type , probably much like the comments posted in PC mag.
I challange anyone to show me a better or more
complete tech/ discussion site, it just isnt there.
Where else can you go and get such diversity of subjects/ forums on one single page?.
As well thought out or laid out???
Sometimes I read tech subjects -- sometimes look at members photos {butterflys to cats and nature}-- argue politic--read the links posted ,read humor, read discussion on members motorbikes--maybe even read about Mulders bicycle!
What is wrong with that?.
The thing that really bothers me is people who act like they are "victims" of Random or CD.
If they don't like those particular forums --why do they go there ????. Why try to spoil for others???.
Its Mike Cermaks site , and he can do as wishes, but I do think if members opinions are ask , maybe it should be wider sample of opinion?.
I am not trying to be argumentative , just see what IMO , is too much negativism.
I am not opposed to change , in fact the changes in security help was smart , too many like me trying to help {blind leading blind}, but I do appreciate the basic build of this site.
I know if it wasn't the great site that it is , I wouldn't be paid member.>f