There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
access audio avg avg 8 bios blue screen boot bsod computer connection cpu crash css dell desktop dma driver drivers dvd email error excel explorer firefox firefox 3 freeze gimp graphics hard drive hardware hijackthis hjt install internet internet explorer itunes keyboard laptop macro malware monitor motherboard network networking outlook outlook 2003 outlook 2007 outlook express pio problem problems router seo server slow sound sp3 spyware trojan usb video virtumonde virus vista vundo windows windows vista windows xp winxp wireless
Site Comments & Suggestions
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > Community > Site Comments & Suggestions >
Solved: Rules regarding attachments in Business Apps


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

 
Thread Tools
cristobal03's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 2,991 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Experience: Advanced
03-Mar-2008, 06:30 PM #1
Solved: Rules regarding attachments in Business Apps
As attachment-heavy as the Business Applications forum has gotten in the past couple of years, I think TSG needs to create some rules regarding acceptable attachments in terms of content. The problem is, many people coming to us for help don't always think about the implications of posting a working file (this is especially true of databases) or a screenshot containing sensitive private data--or, in some cases, confidential or proprietary business data. We try our best to tell users they need to obfuscate such information, but that doesn't always address the entire issue (e.g., propriety, or sensitive information in the metadata/document properties). It's a growing problem in that Business Apps is becoming increasingly an attachment-oriented forum, which is in my opinion unfortunate, but that's another matter.

What I propose is either a set of rules or at minimum a sticky in Business Apps detailing the minimum acceptable standard of confidentiality to which all attachments must conform, and--this is the rough part--enforce a policy such that any attachments in violation and all subsequent attachments of the same file within the thread be removed. This is important because of the pace in Business Apps. When a file comes in, oftentimes there is a revised or corrected version posted within the hour. Obviously we are not obfuscating the contents of the file when we provide solutions or suggestions, so the sensitive data still remains in the subsequent attachment.

The problem is particularly evident in database threads. People post database files containing records of doctor/patient visits, social security numbers, private addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, and all sorts of things. Even when we ask them to "dummy" the data, they don't always do it. I think this is a huge liability for TSG because the site isn't indemnified against the random person who discovers his name and SSN have been posted on the Internet in a database file, for example. It's easy to say now, "What are the odds," but that argument won't hold up in court, so to speak.

Maybe I'm going overboard, but it's definitely becoming a problem. Like I said, at a bare minimum, I think there needs to be a sticky, and if attachments don't comply with the sticky, at least the original should be removed.

chris.
cristobal03's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 2,991 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Experience: Advanced
03-Mar-2008, 08:03 PM #2
[bump]

Well, after looking around a bit, I see indemnity is granted by the third section of the legal page, but I still think it'd be appropriate to devote some space to suggest to new users best practice regarding sensitive working document attachments.

chris.
Yankee Rose's Avatar
Computer Specs
Senior Member with 1,696 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Workin' on my fitness.
Experience: BS Degree/A+/MCP, OS X
03-Mar-2008, 08:29 PM #3
Hey cristobal03:

I think you are addressing a very important point. With privacy and security as big a concern as it is, TSG would be wise to have this reviewed and revamped.

Very worthwhile suggestion.
iltos's Avatar
iltos iltos is offline iltos has a Profile Picture   iltos has a birthday soon!
Community Moderator with 12,915 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sierra Madre, CA
Experience: Beginner
04-Mar-2008, 12:17 PM #4
Quote:
Originally Posted by cristobal03 View Post
As attachment-heavy as the Business Applications forum has gotten in the past couple of years, I think TSG needs to create some rules regarding acceptable attachments in terms of content. The problem is, many people coming to us for help don't always think about the implications of posting a working file (this is especially true of databases) or a screenshot containing sensitive private data--or, in some cases, confidential or proprietary business data. We try our best to tell users they need to obfuscate such information, but that doesn't always address the entire issue (e.g., propriety, or sensitive information in the metadata/document properties). It's a growing problem in that Business Apps is becoming increasingly an attachment-oriented forum, which is in my opinion unfortunate, but that's another matter.

chris.
this is a valid concern, as some recent reports have shown
fwiw, however -the business apps forum has probably been the one tech forum that i have frequented most often, and always with a specific question about some task or arother that i've taken on and realized either a/doesn't do exactly what i need it to do, or b/ i've little idea what the possibilities are or how to make them work (perhaps a generally reason why there's been the increase in attachments there you mentioned)- i've found a lot of very knowledgable and helpful folks there who are very diligent in their warnings about emails and other sensitive data.

as with most difficulties at this site, then, the problem lies with the member asking for help rather than the helper.....

and stickies don't seem to be in most people's radar....especially ones that are cautionary and smack of some kine of "rule" (even if they are dead on)...i'm sure a stickie wouldn't hurt...i just don't see it doing much good, either.

most authorative help in that forum -like you, chris- may just be stuck with the adamacy of your warnings....and the report button....to keep this issue fresh in the rest of our minds.
__________________
"When we face the empire, we face ourselves...to survive, it is imperative that we cease to lie to ourselves about our condition." -Phil Rockstroh

"I love America more than any other country in this world, and, exactly for this reason: I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually." - James Baldwin

"The problems that exist in the world today cannot be solved by the level of thinking that created them" -Albert Einstein
cristobal03's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 2,991 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Experience: Advanced
04-Mar-2008, 02:06 PM #5
Yeah, that's kind of the response I was expecting, and I think it's probably the most practicable one. Mainly the reason I brought it up was to suggest the policy of deleting all attachments of the same file within a thread if the file's obviously sensitive. I think it's pretty controversial because it means deleting solutions, which people provide voluntarily. But on the other hand, it's also the appropriate thing to do in order to protect hapless citizens from having their personal information exposed.

I mean, there's no way to unilaterally fix the problem unless TSG disallows attachments altogether, which is in itself a very bad idea. So, I don't know. Can we expect our veterans to maintain vigilance about it? Who knows? I hope so. If I had to ballpark it, though, I'd say of the requests (by veterans) for file uploads I've seen, maybe 1 in 3 includes an admonition against posting private data.

It isn't TSG's fault at all; that isn't what I'm getting at. Neither is it the poster's fault, nor (necessarily) the helpers' fault. The posters aren't always aware of what it means to post a working file, and the helpers don't necessarily know what's in the file.

I don't know. Just thought I'd raise the issue.

chris.
TechGuy's Avatar
Computer Specs
Administrator with 8,404 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Chambersburg, PA
Experience: Advanced
04-Mar-2008, 02:07 PM #6
Cookiegal just contacted me about this one and suggested a Sticky that will be up in Business shortly.
Cookiegal's Avatar
Administrator with 53,226 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Quebec, Canada
04-Mar-2008, 02:54 PM #7
Yes, I felt this was a concern too. Mike and I collaborated on this to come up with the sticky that is up now.
cristobal03's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 2,991 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Experience: Advanced
04-Mar-2008, 03:34 PM #8
Forgot to post my quick reply when I marked this "Solved." Thanks again guys, I really appreciate the attention and effort

chris.
Cookiegal's Avatar
Administrator with 53,226 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Quebec, Canada
04-Mar-2008, 04:00 PM #9
You're welcome and thanks for the suggestion.
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:24 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.