There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tech Tips & Tricks
Tag Cloud
audio blue screen boot bsod computer cpu crash dell desktop driver drivers error excel external hard drive firefox freezes freezing hard drive hardware hijackthis internet internet explorer ipod itunes lan laptop malware motherboard mouse network networking outlook 2007 power printer problem ram router screen slow sound trojan upgrade usb virus vista vista 32-bit windows windows xp winxp wireless
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > General Technology > Tech Tips & Tricks >
XP Myths - Myths Regarding Windows XP


Computer problem? Tech Support Guy is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations. Click here to join today! If you're new to Tech Support Guy, we highly recommend that you visit our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Mastertech's Avatar
Senior Member with 452 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Experience: 15 Years
03-Oct-2005, 04:39 AM #1
Exclamation XP Myths - Myths Regarding Windows XP
XP Myths - Myths Regarding Windows XP

"Myth (Definition) - A fiction or half-truth, especially one that forms part of an ideology. There are numerous Myths floating around the Internet regarding Windows XP, especially relating to Optimizations and Security. Hopefully this site will debunk some of these."
Elvandil's Avatar
Moderator with 30,594 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vermont
03-Oct-2005, 05:34 AM #2
That's very good. I saw a similar one a while back, but I had to disagree with many of the comments in that one---some of the "myths" they tried to debunk were actually true.

Hopefully, a lot of people will read this one. It would eliminate many posts and pointless discussions .
__________________
Microsoft MVP
Windows Shell/User
JohnWill's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 80,832 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South Eastern PA, USA
Experience: Advanced age & experience
03-Oct-2005, 10:47 AM #3
I'd be interested in hearing which of their "myths" you believe to be true. I didn't see any where I really disagreed with their conclusions.
LauraMJ's Avatar
Computer Specs
Administrator with 4,620 posts.
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Somewhere back in the Mountain
Experience: better than my sister
03-Oct-2005, 10:57 AM #4
I believe Elvandil is saying the "other" site, which he doesn't name, is the one that had "myths" that were actually true.
Elvandil's Avatar
Moderator with 30,594 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vermont
03-Oct-2005, 03:35 PM #5
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnWill
I'd be interested in hearing which of their "myths" you believe to be true. I didn't see any where I really disagreed with their conclusions.
Yes, I think these are valid and often a bone of contention.
JohnWill's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 80,832 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South Eastern PA, USA
Experience: Advanced age & experience
03-Oct-2005, 05:22 PM #6
You're right, I didn't see the "other site" reference.
hewee's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 52,475 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: *Random People Pleaser***Sacramento
Experience: Having fun
03-Oct-2005, 06:45 PM #7
Don't have have XP so no way to know what is true or not.
But I do know on 98SE that I have many programs that lock the hosts file but only Zone Alarm Pro has worked at protecting the hosts file 100% in test I made. Other protect the hosts file part way to not at all. I have seen false things show up in spybot and cwshredder that are just bad sites I am blocking in my hosts file. cwshredder was always able to delete from it. Spybot deleted some and wanted to reboot to delete the others.
But with ZA pro nothing was ever deleted. I do my scans now with the hosts file disable so it is renamed so I do not get false reports plus it speeds up the scans.
__________________
Donating to TSG helps to keep the site going so please do your part and help.

Keep Your Security Software Current
Calendar of Updates

Work like you don't need the money.
Love like you've never been hurt.
Dance like nobody's watching.
Sing like nobody's listening.
quote from Satchel Paige

My Pictures
Mastertech's Avatar
Senior Member with 452 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Experience: 15 Years
04-Oct-2005, 08:30 AM #8
Quote:
Don't have have XP so no way to know what is true or not. But I do know on 98SE that I have many programs that lock the hosts file but only Zone Alarm Pro has worked at protecting the hosts file 100% in test I made. Other protect the hosts file part way to not at all. I have seen false things show up in spybot and cwshredder that are just bad sites I am blocking in my hosts file. cwshredder was always able to delete from it. Spybot deleted some and wanted to reboot to delete the others. But with ZA pro nothing was ever deleted. I do my scans now with the hosts file disable so it is renamed so I do not get false reports plus it speeds up the scans.
You want to seriously consider getting Windows 2000 or XP because real security on 98SE is just not possible. You can easily stop spyware and not have to waste time updating hosts files.
hewee's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 52,475 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: *Random People Pleaser***Sacramento
Experience: Having fun
05-Oct-2005, 05:40 AM #9
Well my next PC I will get XP but not on this one. Do have Windows 2000 my sister gave me but have not used it.
Space Cowboy's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 5,925 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Space Station #5
Experience: Space Cadet
05-Oct-2005, 08:15 AM #10
Quote:
Originally Posted by hewee
Well my next PC I will get XP but not on this one. Do have Windows 2000 my sister gave me but have not used it.

Wait for Vista Harry. I got a bunch of spare parts to keep ya going till then.
PixieStrange's Avatar
Member with 40 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Experience: Intermediate
05-Oct-2005, 01:24 PM #11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mastertech
You want to seriously consider getting Windows 2000 or XP because real security on 98SE is just not possible. You can easily stop spyware and not have to waste time updating hosts files.
Actually, in a lot of ways 98SE is more secure than XP or 2k. You have to consider that in XP/2000 there are shares open that you really can't close. Whereas 98 you have to turn a bunch of junk on.

In regards to spyware and the like, again, XP is more vulnerable than 98 simply because of the way the OS handles things. Also on 98 removals tend to be easier because you can't really truly lock anything out. So any spyware/junk that tries to lock itself down can't. XP/2k it can. I've seen spyware that would reset the admin account, scramble the password on it, and lock the user out of a lot of stuff. 98 that can't be done.

Windows XP gives you a LOT more control over security (long as you're using Pro and not gimp Home), and you CAN lock it down tighter than 98, but for the majority of people, 98 is plenty secure, and XP/2k just opens them up.
__________________
Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, All my base are belong to you.
Mastertech's Avatar
Senior Member with 452 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Experience: 15 Years
05-Oct-2005, 04:10 PM #12
Quote:
Actually, in a lot of ways 98SE is more secure than XP or 2k. You have to consider that in XP/2000 there are shares open that you really can't close. Whereas 98 you have to turn a bunch of junk on.
XP Pro has admin shares open that you can close. Try reading: Secure XP.

Quote:
In regards to spyware and the like, again, XP is more vulnerable than 98 simply because of the way the OS handles things.
No it's not.

Quote:
Also on 98 removals tend to be easier because you can't really truly lock anything out. So any spyware/junk that tries to lock itself down can't. XP/2k it can. I've seen spyware that would reset the admin account, scramble the password on it, and lock the user out of a lot of stuff. 98 that can't be done.


Quote:
Windows XP gives you a LOT more control over security (long as you're using Pro and not gimp Home), and you CAN lock it down tighter than 98, but for the majority of people, 98 is plenty secure, and XP/2k just opens them up.
That is just pure BS. Anyone with half a brain would not be using 98, let alone think it is in any way secure. Please.

Last edited by Mastertech : 05-Oct-2005 05:18 PM.
Stoner's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 34,830 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dayton,Oh
05-Oct-2005, 05:11 PM #13
Quote:
Anyone with have a brain would not be using 98
Perhaps you meant 'half a brain'

I use 98se, 2K (now) and XP home for several years just not online.
98se works just fine, thank you.
I frequently read the security threads and wonder how and why some people have so much trouble and not others.
I've even set up a 95 box and surfed the internet without picking up malware/evilware.

Different OS's sem to have different vulnerabilities, but naturally, newer ones are inherrently more secure.

Excuse me while my other half a brain leaves the room to boot up the old Gateway .....


BTW, Mastertech...thanks for the post
__________________
"The very existence of flame-throwers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done." G.C.

-------------------------------------------->
Mastertech's Avatar
Senior Member with 452 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Experience: 15 Years
05-Oct-2005, 05:23 PM #14
If you had any comprehension about how the operating systems work you would never use Win9x/ME again. As for the "works just fine" comment, that is alot of nonsense. Those OSes are inheritently unstable and offer no security. The fact that people continue to use them instead of 2K or XP only shows how many people that are out there that still do not get it. If you don't want to use 2K or XP, then use a Linux distro or OS X. Please just bury the unstable, unsecure DOS based OSes once and for all. There is no reason to use crap anymore and has not been since 2000.
Mastertech's Avatar
Senior Member with 452 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Experience: 15 Years
05-Oct-2005, 05:28 PM #15
I really love the 98 vs XP security argument. It is like saying it is better to own a house with no locks and alarm system because you know a friend who's house was broken into and the burglars changed the locks and code on the alarm and they could not get in to their own house. Right........
Closed Thread

THIS THREAD HAS EXPIRED.
Are you having the same problem? We have volunteers ready to answer your question, but first you'll have to join for free. Need help getting started? Check out our Welcome Guide.


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who want to help you solve your computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.



Thread Tools


You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:50 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.