Congratulations to AcaCandy on her 100,000th post!
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
acer black screen boot bsod computer connection crash css dell display driver drivers email error ethernet excel firefox firefox 3 game hard drive internet internet explorer itunes laptop linux malware monitor network networking nvidia outlook outlook 2003 outlook 2007 outlook express partition problem router slow software sound spyware trojan usb video virus vista windows windows vista windows xp wireless
Tech Tips & Tricks
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > General Technology > Tech Tips & Tricks >
Tip: Privacy: Check out your computer's timestamp on each packet


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
lotuseclat79's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 10,449 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: -71.45091, 42.27841
12-May-2006, 08:46 AM #1
Tip: Privacy: Check out your computer's timestamp on each packet
Are timestamps enabled for each packet on your computer?

Take the TCP/IP Analyzer SpeedGuide.net test to find out:
http://www.speedguide.net:8080/
If the Timestamps (RFC1191) = ON, then your computer can be tracked to the ends of the earth on the basis of your Clock Skew.

You can disable the timestamps for Windows with the TCPOptimizer program from speedguide at: http://www.speedguide.net/downloads.php

Or, you can edit the registry.

Clock Skew and your computer's fingerprint:
Read this (dated March 13, 2005) at: http://www.spywareinfo.com/newslette...2005/mar13.php

In other words, in the "Kiss your Anonymity Goodbye" article unless you either falsify the timestamps on each packet or instruct the computer not to attach them to each packet - your computer clock skew can identify your computer.

Story Link: http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/securit...9183346,00.htm
Remote Physical Device Fingerprinting (PDF paper download available at): http://www.caida.org/publications/pa...ingerprinting/ (9.94MB)

-- Tom
__________________
The independence created by philosophical insight is - in my opinion - the mark of distinction between a mere artisan or specialist and a real seeker after truth. - Einstein wrote in 1944.

Some say knowledge is power, I say knowledge without action is powerless. - lotuseclat79

Don't confuse action with movement. - Hemingway to Gardner

Imagination is more important than knowledge. - Einstein
WhitPhil's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 8,459 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Whitby, Ontario
12-May-2006, 09:49 AM #2
Note that it is the identity of the computer that can be seen, NOT the identity of the user of that computer.
brendandonhu's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 15,988 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Experience: Advanced
12-May-2006, 12:49 PM #3
Remember it would also require your computer to send TCP/IP packets to someone that's trying to track you for them to measure the clock the skew, and those packets would have to be identified as coming from the same computer.

Last edited by brendandonhu : 12-May-2006 12:55 PM.
lotuseclat79's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 10,449 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: -71.45091, 42.27841
12-May-2006, 05:03 PM #4
Quote:
Originally Posted by brendandonhu
Remember it would also require your computer to send TCP/IP packets to someone that's trying to track you for them to measure the clock the skew, and those packets would have to be identified as coming from the same computer.
Not if "they" are tapped into the Internet backbones and have a way to trap your traffic from listening to everything. "They" probably are using Carnivore surreptitiously anyway - you do know whom I mean by "they" I presume. Assumption is that packets are timestamped.

-- Tom

Last edited by lotuseclat79 : 12-May-2006 05:13 PM.
BanditFlyer's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 11,361 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: BOT бaHДиT
Experience: It Depends
12-May-2006, 06:10 PM #5
Good Info, Tom,

Thanks
brendandonhu's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 15,988 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Experience: Advanced
12-May-2006, 09:02 PM #6
Quote:
Not if "they" are tapped into the Internet backbones and have a way to trap your traffic from listening to everything.
Also remember that the methods in the study that work on default Windows 2000/XP require communicating with the machine being fingerprinted or modifying packets-- packet monitoring isn't enough to do it. Of course, if all traffic is being monitored, you have bigger problems than clock skew anyway
__________________
-Brendan

Last edited by brendandonhu : 12-May-2006 09:26 PM.
Closed Thread

THIS THREAD HAS EXPIRED.
Are you having the same problem? We have volunteers ready to answer your question, but first you'll have to join for free. Need help getting started? Check out our Welcome Guide.


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who help people like you solve computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.



Thread Tools


You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 PM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.