Live Chat & Podcast at 1:00PM Eastern on Sunday!
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
Search
Tech Tips & Tricks
Tag Cloud
access acer asus bios bsod computer crash desktop driver drivers error ethernet excel freeze gaming hard drive hardware hdmi internet laptop malware memory modem monitor motherboard network printer problem ram registry router security slow software sound toshiba trojan ubuntu 11.10 uninstall usb video virus vista wifi windows windows 7 windows 7 32 bit windows 7 64 bit windows xp wireless
Search
Search for:
Tech Support Guy Forums > General Technology > Tech Tips & Tricks >
speed up computer

Reply  
Thread Tools
WhitPhil's Avatar
Computer Specs
Trusted Advisor - Gone but never forgotten with 9,280 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Whitby, Ontario
29-Apr-2007, 09:25 PM #16
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvnmenon
Try it and let me know sir..
Try what?

Deleting the prefetch files is counter intuitive and DOES result in a performance hit. Sometimes small, but definitely there since XP needs to rebuild all of the "knowledge" in the prefetch info files.

And Minsps is not an XP option.

So, if neither of these, then what??

And, if you are "really" recommending deleting the prefetch files, please take the time to explain why you believe that this would actually result in an increase in performance.
flavallee's Avatar
Computer Specs
Trusted Advisor with 40,857 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brandon/Valrico, Florida
Experience: Advanced
29-Apr-2007, 09:36 PM #17
nvnmenon:

You've giving out BAD information.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ferrija1's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 9,756 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Experience: Mac Addict
29-Apr-2007, 10:01 PM #18
Anybody know what the second suggestion does?
WhitPhil's Avatar
Computer Specs
Trusted Advisor - Gone but never forgotten with 9,280 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Whitby, Ontario
29-Apr-2007, 10:27 PM #19
On a Win9x system, if the option is placed correctly, it gets around an error with no stack pages.

Since this is not an option on XP, it does nothing.
ferrija1's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 9,756 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Experience: Mac Addict
29-Apr-2007, 10:59 PM #20
Ok, thanks.
groovyteq's Avatar
Computer Specs
Junior Member with 5 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Experience: Einstein
06-May-2007, 01:51 PM #21
to speed up in the system in xp why not boost the virtual memory in the custom
initial as 2064
maximum as 3064
and then click on set and then apply and click okay and then restart the system and then try msconfig and other attributes like defrag and disk cleanup and registry fixers.
this can be done by right clicking the desktop and then on properties and then advanced tab in system properties and then settings under performance and then advanced tab again and then change the attributes there.
also one can go on the internet and download the windows accelerator and then install the same on the system,this will boost the speed of the processor on the system itself.
PLEASE NOTE:These steps are performed and tested on 1500 DELL systems everyday.and not a problem till date.
groovyteq's Avatar
Computer Specs
Junior Member with 5 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Experience: Einstein
06-May-2007, 01:54 PM #22
Quote:
Originally Posted by ferrija1
Ok, thanks.
why is "to" sounds like the digit number 2 and then "go" should sound like gu is that so?
Does that answer your questions.
groovyteq's Avatar
Computer Specs
Junior Member with 5 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Experience: Einstein
06-May-2007, 01:58 PM #23
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnWill
Moving files that aren't being accessed won't affect the speed at all.
but they still are eating the sapce on the hard drive and cannot be deleted out.
what is the reason keep these useless files on the system if they do not have any use.
That space can be spent other things.

Just a simple thought dont you think so.
WhitPhil's Avatar
Computer Specs
Trusted Advisor - Gone but never forgotten with 9,280 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Whitby, Ontario
06-May-2007, 02:28 PM #24
Quote:
Originally Posted by groovyteq
to speed up in the system in xp why not boost the virtual memory.
"boosting" virtual memory has no affect on performance.

By default, Windows uses as much as needed to begin with.

The key to performance is NOT having an overly active pagefile, and there are only so many ways to reduce this. Such as adding more ram and reducing the amount of applications being run simultaneously.

Playing with swapfile settings paid dividends on Win 3.1 and Win95, but with the advent of faster systems with more ram and faster drives, and the improvement in Windows memory management, there is little to be gained anymore.
groovyteq's Avatar
Computer Specs
Junior Member with 5 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Experience: Einstein
06-May-2007, 02:38 PM #25
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhitPhil
"boosting" virtual memory has no affect on performance.

By default, Windows uses as much as needed to begin with.

The key to performance is NOT having an overly active pagefile, and there are only so many ways to reduce this. Such as adding more ram and reducing the amount of applications being run simultaneously.

Playing with swapfile settings paid dividends on Win 3.1 and Win95, but with the advent of faster systems with more ram and faster drives, and the improvement in Windows memory management, there is little to be gained anymore.
was takling in only reference to XP that is XP HOME,XP PRO,XP MCE only,please read solution line first for reference.
Thanks
WhitPhil's Avatar
Computer Specs
Trusted Advisor - Gone but never forgotten with 9,280 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Whitby, Ontario
06-May-2007, 02:45 PM #26
I was talking about XP (as well as Win9x)

Why do you believe that boosting VM on these systems affects performance?

Having more buys you nothing!
ferrija1's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 9,756 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Experience: Mac Addict
06-May-2007, 03:02 PM #27
Quote:
Originally Posted by groovyteq
why is "to" sounds like the digit number 2 and then "go" should sound like gu is that so?
Does that answer your questions.
What the heck?!?!?!
JohnWill's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 110,212 posts.
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South Eastern PA, USA
Experience: Advanced age & experience
06-May-2007, 04:51 PM #28
The only thing I can see boosting virtual memory doing is reducing performance, I can't imagine having excess virtual memory available is going to help in any way. If you want better performance, add real memory.
durant125's Avatar
Computer Specs
Member with 237 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Experience: WoW Im StuPeed
27-May-2007, 10:15 PM #29
reformat hardrive and download and install gentoo.
ferrija1's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 9,756 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Experience: Mac Addict
27-May-2007, 11:13 PM #30
Quote:
Originally Posted by durant125
reformat hardrive and download and install gentoo.
Simply, no.
Reply

THIS THREAD HAS EXPIRED.
Are you having the same problem? We have volunteers ready to answer your question, but first you'll have to join for free. Need help getting started? Check out our Welcome Guide.

Search Tech Support Guy

Find the solution to your
computer problem!




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who want to help you solve your computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.
Thread Tools



Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter TechGuy.tv TechGuy.tv Mobile TSG Mobile
You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 PM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2011 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.

Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.