There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
black screen blue screen boot computer connection crash css dell display driver drivers error excel firefox firefox 3 game hard drive internet internet explorer itunes laptop lcd linux malware monitor network networking nvidia outlook outlook 2003 outlook express partition password printer problem problems ram router slow software sound startup trojan usb video virus vista windows windows xp wireless
UNIX/Linux
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > Operating Systems > UNIX/Linux >
newbie trying to install redhat 9 help please


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
atconc's Avatar
Member with 83 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: uk
24-Jun-2003, 11:33 AM #1
[resolved]newbie trying to install redhat 9 help please
Hi,

I'm trying to install linux on an old box that isn't beeing used for anything at the moment. I've downloaded the 3 iso images for redhat 9

When I boot from the first cd I get the welcome to linux screens and the media check works ok then after the media check screen I get

"Error 2 reading header:cpio:bad magic"

in a blue panel taking up the top half of the screen the bottom half says:

[i]Running anaconda, the red hat linux system installer - please wait..
exec: bad address
install exited abnormally
sending termination signals...done
sending kill signals...done
disable swap...
unmounting filesystems...

you may safely reboot your system.

The system is a slot1 pentium 3 500mhz on an old gigabyte mobo
330mb ram
17gig seagate HD
old generic CDROM
16 gare 128 graphics

Also the system is tempremental about booting from cd- even though it is set to in the bios it only boots from cd roughly 1time out of every 3 or 4.

Trying to install from cd because I don't have a working floppy drive to put in the system

System was previously running win2k

Last edited by atconc : 25-Jun-2003 07:29 AM.
codejockey's Avatar
Senior Member with 1,410 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
24-Jun-2003, 12:06 PM #2
I suspect your image was corrupt when you burned it to CD. Did you verify the checksum before burning it? The "bad magic" error means that Linux was expecting to find a cpio archive, and although it found a file with the correct name, the internal information was not consistent with what it expected for a cpio archive. Translation: data error.

Hope this helps.
__________________
The slowest component still sits at the keyboard.
atconc's Avatar
Member with 83 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: uk
24-Jun-2003, 06:00 PM #3
I didn't verify the checksum - how do I go about doing that? I'm quite competent with hardware stuff and windows, but I@m a complete linux virgin

thanks for your help

*update* I've run the disk checker that loads as part of the install and it says cd1 is bad - how do I find out if it's a bad download or a bad burn? If it is a bad download how do I avoid it happening again.

Last edited by atconc : 24-Jun-2003 07:08 PM.
codejockey's Avatar
Senior Member with 1,410 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
24-Jun-2003, 11:59 PM #4
Often, a download site will post the checksum for each file available for download. These are sometimes called md5sums, after the method used to compute them. Anyway, you need to download the sum (it's a very small file, usually less than 100 bytes), compute the sum on the .iso image you downloaded, and compare it with the sum from the download site. If they match, your download is perfect, and you can go ahead and burn. If they don't, there's no easy way to tell where the difference(s) is/are, but it really doesn't matter -- anything less than a perfect download puts you at risk.

Linux includes a program to compute the md5 sum for you (md5sum); if you've used Windoze to download the .iso, and need to compute the sum in Windoze, there are similar programs available (one such program is available at http://www.pc-tools.net/win32/freeware/md5sums/ and there are others).

Hope this helps.
__________________
The slowest component still sits at the keyboard.
atconc's Avatar
Member with 83 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: uk
25-Jun-2003, 05:40 AM #5
thanks - I've established that the sum is the same using that tool so it must be a bad burn, I'll try burning again
Squashman's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 12,699 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 1265 Lombardi Ave
25-Jun-2003, 06:00 AM #6
It could be your cd drive. I had a similar issue and I swapped out the cd drive and the graphical install finally started.
atconc's Avatar
Member with 83 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: uk
25-Jun-2003, 06:17 AM #7
thanks, I was just coming back to post the same think when I got the notification of your message - out of curiousity I ran the media check part of set up on my xp box and it passed all the media, that might explain why the other box only intermitantly boots from cd - I think the drive in it is from the stone age!

Will see if I have an old cd drive around anwhere to swap it for

thanks for ur advice
atconc's Avatar
Member with 83 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: uk
25-Jun-2003, 07:30 AM #8
It certainly seems to be the cd drive - it was made in 1997 so no suprise there - the cds work fine in my other box
codejockey's Avatar
Senior Member with 1,410 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
26-Jun-2003, 04:04 AM #9
Glad to hear that you may have identified the problem!

Note that there are (always) two issues whenever you download and burn data to a CD:

(1) is the download correct?
(2) is the burn correct?

It is possible to have a successful download (i.e., satisfy (1)), but still generate data errors when burning to CD (which may be what happened in your case). On Linux, you can check both your download and your burn using the md5sum command (you sum the downloaded image to verify the correctness of the download; you sum the CD data (after burning) to verify the correctness of the burn).

Again, nice work sorting things out.
__________________
The slowest component still sits at the keyboard.
Closed Thread

THIS THREAD HAS EXPIRED.
Are you having the same problem? We have volunteers ready to answer your question, but first you'll have to join for free. Need help getting started? Check out our Welcome Guide.


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who help people like you solve computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.



Thread Tools


You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.