There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
access audio avg avg 8 bios blue screen boot bsod computer connection cpu crash css dell desktop dma driver drivers dvd email error excel explorer firefox firefox 3 freeze gimp graphics hard drive hardware hijackthis hjt install internet internet explorer itunes keyboard laptop macro malware monitor motherboard network networking outlook outlook 2003 outlook 2007 outlook express pio problem problems router seo server slow sound sp3 spyware trojan usb video virtumonde virus vista vundo windows windows vista windows xp winxp wireless
UNIX/Linux
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > Operating Systems > UNIX/Linux >
1024 cylinder limit question...


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

 
Thread Tools
jharrison's Avatar
Senior Member with 129 posts.
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
02-May-2001, 10:33 AM #1
Can someone please explain to me in english the whole 1024 cylinder limit thing with Linux? I have a 12gig hard drive and want to partition it correctly so that I don't get the 1024 limit error upon installing Linux. Where is the 1024 cylinder limit on a hard drive?

What I'd like to do is have a C: partition (Primary, active FAT32) for Win98SE 2 gigs large, D: partition (Extended, Logical FAT32) for Windows data/programs 7 gigs large, and then the rest for Linux partitions (about 3 gigs).

Does Linux need to install anything on the C: partition above during its install, and if so can it do that on a FAT32 partition instead of FAT? If the C: partition has to be FAT it's not a problem.

Any help with these questions would be appreciated.
MikeV's Avatar
Senior Member with 722 posts.
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Livermore, CA
Experience: Advanced
03-May-2001, 01:28 PM #2
As long as you have the newest version of LILO (exact version number eludes me, but most distros should have iimplemented it by now) you won't need to worry about teh 1024 Cyl limit.

The issue with old version basically was because LILO wouln't boot a Linux partition that was past physical cyl. 1024 on the hard disk. It could be fixed by 1) Not installing LILO to the MBR, 2) Installing LILO to the Superblock of your linux partition, or 3) Using a boot disk.

-M
__________________
Debian
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 PM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.