There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
black screen blue screen boot bsod computer connection crash css dell display driver drivers email error explorer firefox firefox 3 hard drive internet internet explorer itunes laptop lcd malware monitor network networking nvidia outlook outlook 2003 outlook express password printer problem problems ram router security slow software sound sprtcmd.exe trojan usb video virus vista windows windows xp wireless
UNIX/Linux
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > Operating Systems > UNIX/Linux >
32- or 64-bit Ubuntu, which should I choose?


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Dave Mustaine's Avatar
Computer Specs
Junior Member with 25 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2007
21-Aug-2007, 08:22 PM #1
32- or 64-bit Ubuntu, which should I choose?
I want to try out Ubuntu Linux but I'm unsure of which version I should install. I have a 64-bit processor but I want to know if there are software and driver compatibility issues with the 64-bit version like on Windows XP. Which should I get?
lotuseclat79's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 10,536 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: -71.45091, 42.27841
22-Aug-2007, 09:45 AM #2
Hi Dave,

If you just want to try out Ubuntu with an option to install, then your best bet is to download a Live CD ISO (free) and burn the image to a CD available here or here. Fiesty (7.04) is the current stable release. Gutsy Gibbon (rel. 7.10) will be available in Ocober 2007, but is currently in Alpha testing.

Checkout the Ubuntu Fiesty Starter Guide (rel. 7.04) here. Note: If you are using 64-bit version replace any "i386" with "amd64" is a statement at the end of the General Notes section (near the top).

Typically, Linux has more drivers than Windows OSes, so that should not be a problem (I do not run a 64-bit machine, but I have read about the driver issue). Linux has OpenOffice as opposed to Windows MS Office, and can handle .doc files easily.

-- Tom
__________________
The independence created by philosophical insight is - in my opinion - the mark of distinction between a mere artisan or specialist and a real seeker after truth. - Einstein wrote in 1944.

Some say knowledge is power, I say knowledge without action is powerless. - lotuseclat79

Don't confuse action with movement. - Hemingway to Gardner

Imagination is more important than knowledge. - Einstein
tomdkat's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 3,716 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area, CA
Experience: Intermediate
22-Aug-2007, 04:23 PM #3
This is a topic that is and has been debated to death on the Ubuntu forums. I suggest you search there for "32-bit vs 64-bit" discussions.

The short story is this: if you want the "easiest" Ubuntu experience, go with the 32-bit version. Why? Things like Flash, wine, and other 32-bit apps will "just work". There are ways to get Flash, wine, and other 32-bit apps working in a 64-bit Ubuntu environment, but you'll have to find online resources with the installation instructions.

I run Feisty Fawn 64-bit native on my AMD Athlon64 3200+ based eMachines box at home. I am able to run the 32-bit version of Opera for Linux if I run a command line command to force the installation (the normal installation method won't work since the installer will report you're trying to install an app that doesn't match the OS native architecture), which is fine but I had to find that command before I could do the install. If I ran the 32-bit version of Ubuntu, I could just install the Opera installation file by double-clicking it.

I currently live mostly without Flash support in Firefox, Seamonkey, and Epiphany (GNOME's browser). If I absolutely have to have Flash support, I run the 32-bit Opera browser I have since 32-bit Flash works in it (for the most part).

I fully advocate and support running Linux 64-bit native since the more 64-bit users there are out there, the more software developers will port and develop 64-bit native apps. If you're ok with putting for a *little* bit of effort to get support for some 32-bit apps that just aren't available 64-bit native yet, go with the 64-bit installation. There are scripts and TONS of threads on the Ubuntu forum which will help you get the 32-bit apps you need working in your 64-bit Ubuntu installation.

Otherwise, go with the 32-bit version and see how the software trends develop in the 64-bit world.

I haven't had any issues with device drivers or stuff like that and I can connect my digital camera or other USB devices (like an external USB 2.0 HDD) to my machine and things tend to work as expected.

Good luck!

Peace...
Closed Thread

THIS THREAD HAS EXPIRED.
Are you having the same problem? We have volunteers ready to answer your question, but first you'll have to join for free. Need help getting started? Check out our Welcome Guide.


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY! Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question -- for free! Our site is run completely by volunteers who help people like you solve computer problems. See our Welcome Guide to get started.



Thread Tools


You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:04 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.