There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
access audio avg avg 8 bios blue screen boot bsod computer connection cpu crash css dell desktop dma driver drivers dvd email error excel explorer firefox firefox 3 freeze gimp graphics hard drive hardware hijackthis hjt install internet internet explorer itunes keyboard laptop macro malware monitor motherboard network networking outlook outlook 2003 outlook 2007 outlook express pio problem problems router seo server slow sound sp3 spyware trojan usb video virtumonde virus vista vundo windows windows vista windows xp winxp wireless
UNIX/Linux
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > Operating Systems > UNIX/Linux >
How easy is it to install Linux?


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

 
Thread Tools
RootbeaR's Avatar
Computer Specs
Senior Member with 1,701 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Experience: Getting it
06-Dec-2007, 09:43 AM #1
How easy is it to install Linux?
A friend of mine bought a HP a6218x last night with Vista home primo installed.

1.6 GHz duo-core pentium
2 GB ram

I installed Vista, created recovery discs and popped in PCLinuxOS.

Clicked install, use existing and erase partitions.

Automatically created root, home and swap partitions. Not how I would have done it, but done.

It created 7.8 GB root, I would have went 10 Gb. It created a 2 GB Swap, I would've went 1 GB.

Done.

Using it now, Vista is gone.

How hard is that?

1/2 hour installed and updated.

Vista took two hours to set up, after being pre-installed. (not updated)
__________________
Registered Linux User #450919

"All hear my warning, never turn your back, or I'll attack...."
The Ripper
Judas Priest

This is my intellectual property. Please do not tamper with it. Or face severe criminal prosecution to the full extent of the Law. (Where would we be today if math formulas and equations were to be copyrighted when first thought of?)
RobLinux's Avatar
Computer Specs
Senior Member with 383 posts.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Experience: UNIX/Linux Pro, M$ 'doze Sufferer
06-Dec-2007, 11:19 AM #2
The swap space needs to be as large as RAM for "hibernate" & "resume" feature to work reliably. So 1GB swap would be a bit dodgy under some workloads (though usually you will not have 1GB of state). BTW I'm not saying it does work reliably, just when ACPI type stuff does get super solid, having more swap space, will help machine in future.
RootbeaR's Avatar
Computer Specs
Senior Member with 1,701 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Experience: Getting it
06-Dec-2007, 02:25 PM #3
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobLinux
The swap space needs to be as large as RAM for "hibernate" & "resume" feature to work reliably. So 1GB swap would be a bit dodgy under some workloads (though usually you will not have 1GB of state). BTW I'm not saying it does work reliably, just when ACPI type stuff does get super solid, having more swap space, will help machine in future.
Thanks.
I won't bother changing it then.
Was going to because I have never seen my RAM more than half utilized and have never seen swap used.
RobLinux's Avatar
Computer Specs
Senior Member with 383 posts.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Experience: UNIX/Linux Pro, M$ 'doze Sufferer
06-Dec-2007, 06:53 PM #4
Could go the other way then. Not have a swap at all. That forces pages to be freed, rather than paged out, but that means "bloat" from applications stays in RAM, if you ever got the situation where the system would rather cache say disk blocks, than keep "dirty" pages in memory. If you do reduce it, I'm sure it'll work, unless you do start using memory intensive stuff, perhaps a Virtual Box or VMware for example. Last time they tried to change the VM, so it *had* to be as big as RAM, it caused too many problems, as lots of ppl had expanded RAM without swap. The distro can't take the risk though and set it up "wrong".

If you're short of space, perhaps you could not have swap, format and use it for something, then use a swap file if you ever need 3GB of VM?

PS. I installed Win98SE today, and guess what it crashed! And needed a few reboots and though it's "working" it's still not right and gonna need a re-do.
RootbeaR's Avatar
Computer Specs
Senior Member with 1,701 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Experience: Getting it
06-Dec-2007, 08:22 PM #5
Thanks for the info. I'm just leaving it the way it is.

Space isn't a problem.

298.9GB for the home partition.
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 PM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.