There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
access audio avg avg 8 bios blue screen boot bsod computer connection cpu crash css dell desktop dma driver drivers dvd email error excel explorer firefox firefox 3 freeze gimp graphics hard drive hardware hijackthis hjt install internet internet explorer itunes keyboard laptop macro malware monitor motherboard network networking outlook outlook 2003 outlook 2007 outlook express pio problem problems router seo server slow sound sp3 spyware trojan usb video virtumonde virus vista vundo windows windows vista windows xp winxp wireless
UNIX/Linux
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > Operating Systems > UNIX/Linux >
Partition suspicions


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

 
Thread Tools
protonsix's Avatar
Junior Member with 15 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Saint Petersburg, Florida, USA
28-Jun-2002, 07:48 PM #1
Thumbs up Partition suspicions
Hello readers,

This is my first post here. Forgive my ettiquette please.

I use a legacy Pentium Pro 200, 440FX chipset, S3 Trio 64V+ video, P50 IBM monitor, 160 MB RAM and new 40 GB HDD.

I am getting warnings from Power Quest products that my system is not suited up correctly for large partitions. My drive came with a very clumsy product (IMHO) sector translation product named Drive Manager. I have to use this because of my legacy BIOS etc. Power Q says my extended partitions beyond the 2^10th cylinder should be marked extendedX. This makes sense: big guys need X- sized tee-shirts.

Possibly there other issues pending. During backups PQ bleeps that the partition's "reserved inode has bad mode".

These concerns may or may not be related to the problem my Mandrake 8.2 "disappears" from the HDD. I wisely boot only from a Linux floppy. I get the message implying that the beginning of Linux is not at the place on the disk it was last time. PANIC button.

I suspect some changes I made to partitions beyond the Linux area for Windows' benefit fouled something up.

This seems to be a case of multiple issues. Any helpful comments will be sincerely appreciated.

Roland Watts
protonsix's Avatar
Junior Member with 15 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Saint Petersburg, Florida, USA
28-Jun-2002, 09:04 PM #2
Thumbs up Read the right directions the first time
Hello readers,

After posting I searched Google for the installation jumper instructions for my new drive. The instruction pdf looked new to me I confess.

It seems my jumper settings are different from those in the pdf.

I wonder if the jumper fix will banish the partition mischief!! Probably so.

Roland
codejockey's Avatar
Senior Member with 1,410 posts.
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
29-Jun-2002, 01:51 AM #3
It's quite likely that incorrect jumper settings would play havoc with an O/S. It's sometimes difficult to know what the correct settings are, however. My last two drives have featured setup instructions that conflicted with the information printed on the drive label. Sometimes it really is a matter of trial and error.

Although incorrect drive settings aren't the only possible cause for O/S difficulties, it certainly makes sense to get this part right before trying much else.

Hope this helps.
__________________
The slowest component still sits at the keyboard.
protonsix's Avatar
Junior Member with 15 posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Saint Petersburg, Florida, USA
01-Jul-2002, 12:39 PM #4
Thumbs up Unexplained improvements
Hi codejockey,

Thanks for the encouraging feedback.

Things are improving after I tried the setting for master drive, with slave present, 16-head flavor.

Not someone to try only one change at a time, I played the "monkey-at-the-typewriter composing a Shakespearean sonnet" game.

I pushed the buttons like crazy in the Ranish Partition Manager, the Win NT Disk (partition) Administrator, the partition clone to/from CD program. Just for zest, I grabbed an alphabetic mixture of parameters to specify in setting up the sector translator!

I attempted to get dual copies of NT running. It was a failure. The darn clone program wanted to play hide-and-seek with some of the partitions. Not knowing what to do, I tried to unhide them with Ranish.

I gave this effort up for dead-on-arrival.

For reasons beyond my understanding, the PC booted nicely after a short nap with two copies of NT installed and selectable at startup! First and second primary partitions for NT. A cool third primary for Linux. Then the extended partition out to the disk's end.

What trouble lurks next in this PC? I am suspicious of things working too well.

Roland
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.