Anyone can say it violates the EULA until their blue in the face. The fact is, it lets Microsoft play both sides of the line; they don't care bit one (yes its a pun) about the dual boot violation when they've got the $200 for a Pro upgrade (my level). I just realized that while Mac users pay a hefty premium for hardware, Windows users are paying quite the premium for new OS software, especially for upgrade since its not coming with the system right(?), except in certain circumstances. Plus, if there is a problem, how much is Microsoft going to save by not having to support anyone they find has violated the EULA with the affront of wanting to boot to either the new OS from Microsoft or the old OS from ahh, Microsoft.
Microsoft, with a foot planted firmly on either side of the EULA...its a neat trick I have to admit.