There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
access audio avg avg 8 bios blue screen boot bsod computer connection cpu crash css dell desktop dma driver drivers dvd email error excel explorer firefox firefox 3 freeze gimp graphics hard drive hardware hijackthis hjt install internet internet explorer itunes keyboard laptop macro malware monitor motherboard network networking outlook outlook 2003 outlook 2007 outlook express pio problem problems router seo server slow sound sp3 spyware trojan usb video virtumonde virus vista vundo windows windows vista windows xp winxp wireless
Windows Vista
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > Operating Systems > Windows Vista >
windows vista


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

 
Thread Tools
nalds18's Avatar
Junior Member with 3 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
23-Apr-2007, 09:20 PM #1
Red face windows vista
i have a hp notebook which is windows vista compatible, can i upgrade it to windows vista ultimate instead of windows vista home premium? i downloaded windoes vista advisor and it says that it has to be windows vista home premium that i need to use for upgrading.
Elvandil's Avatar
Moderator with 29,270 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vermont
23-Apr-2007, 09:34 PM #2
Why did it specify that upgrade? What were the compatibility problems?
nalds18's Avatar
Junior Member with 3 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
23-Apr-2007, 09:40 PM #3
i just downloaded the windows vista upgrade advisor at microsoft.com to identify which vista is best for my notebook and it says that the best one is vista home premium but i'm planning to get the vista ultimate. do you think theres gonna be a compatibility issues if i get the vista ultimate instead of home premium
Rich-M's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 16,338 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Eastern Pa
Experience: Advanced
23-Apr-2007, 11:22 PM #4
You can use Ultimate if you prefer. Advisor tries to find you equivalent of what you had is all.
nalds18's Avatar
Junior Member with 3 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
24-Apr-2007, 01:30 AM #5
ok thanks ;-)
melink14's Avatar
Member with 45 posts.
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Experience: Advanced
24-Apr-2007, 05:16 AM #6
Rich, I haven't done testing on the upgrade advisor in awhile, but doesn't it also determine which version you computer will be able to run the best as well?
kiwiguy's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 17,159 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Zealand
24-Apr-2007, 07:06 AM #7
You need to consider that the term "upgrade" applies differently to versions of the OS that you are upgrading from, depending on the Vista version.

Some will do an "in place" upgrade, others require a "clean install".

That is highly likely to be the advice that is being given by the upgrade advisor, the exact map for what is possible is here:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/pro...radepaths.mspx

Ultimate will need a clean install over most common versions of XP.
__________________
Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Rich-M's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 16,338 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Eastern Pa
Experience: Advanced
24-Apr-2007, 08:30 AM #8
Quote:
Originally Posted by melink14
Rich, I haven't done testing on the upgrade advisor in awhile, but doesn't it also determine which version you computer will be able to run the best as well?
Honestly if it does, I don't remember that.
Rich-M's Avatar
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 16,338 posts.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Eastern Pa
Experience: Advanced
24-Apr-2007, 08:30 AM #9
Kiwi,
I can't imagine why Ultimate would require clean install vs any other version, the core is no different.
Elvandil's Avatar
Moderator with 29,270 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vermont
24-Apr-2007, 04:25 PM #10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich-M
Kiwi,
I can't imagine why Ultimate would require clean install vs any other version, the core is no different.
It shouldn't require a complete re-installation. The only differences compatibility-wise are the enhanced graphics used in Ultimate. But it will still run on any machine that will run Home--it just may need a video upgrade for all the features to be available.
Danltn's Avatar
Junior Member with 14 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Experience: Einstein
26-Apr-2007, 04:35 PM #11
"Ultimate will need a clean install over most common versions of XP."

This is not true, I recently upgraded my Windows XP Home and Pro (2 seperate computers) to Windows Vista Ultimate, neither required a clean install. All old Windows Documents (Windows, Program Files and Document and Settings) are placed within a old.windows folder within the installation drive.

A clean install for Ultimate is not required.
kiwiguy's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 17,159 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Zealand
26-Apr-2007, 05:20 PM #12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich-M
Kiwi,
I can't imagine why Ultimate would require clean install vs any other version, the core is no different.
Not arguing with you there, the map in the link shows the case is that Ultimate requires a clean install only over XP Pro x64 and Win 2000.

It does not help when one is colour-blind, I mis-read the colour codes!
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:16 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.