There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
JoinTour
Login
 
Tag Cloud
access audio avg avg 8 bios blue screen boot bsod computer connection cpu crash css dell desktop dma driver drivers dvd email error excel explorer firefox firefox 3 freeze gimp graphics hard drive hardware hijackthis hjt install internet internet explorer itunes keyboard laptop macro malware monitor motherboard network networking outlook outlook 2003 outlook 2007 outlook express pio problem problems router seo server slow sound sp3 spyware trojan usb video virtumonde virus vista vundo windows windows vista windows xp winxp wireless
Windows Vista
Search
Search in:
 
Advanced Search
Tech Support Guy Forums > Operating Systems > Windows Vista >
Which version of Vista to get?


HELLO AND WELCOME! Before you can post your question, you'll have to register -- it's completely free! Click here to join today! We highly recommend that you print a copy of our Guide for New Members. Enjoy!

 
Thread Tools
Ferendon's Avatar
Senior Member with 151 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Fort Worth
18-Feb-2008, 10:51 PM #1
Which version of Vista to get?
Currently running Win2K Pro, and quite happy. I see the end of 2000-compatibility very near. Don't wanna spend the cash on something that's gonna be on it's way out soon (like XP), so I might as well get on board with the next big thing. All of my hardware is DX10 ready, so I wanna get Vista. What's the best version for someone who has always had the "Pro" version of everything.
__________________
abit Fatal1ty FP-IN9 SLi
C2Q Q6600
4 Gigs Corsair PC6400 Dual Channel
eVGA nVidia 8600GT 512MB
Maxtor 500GB SATAII/300
Pioneer 16x8x16 DVD+-RW
CoolerMaster 500w
Windows Vista Business
Squashman's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 12,598 posts.
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 1265 Lombardi Ave
18-Feb-2008, 11:06 PM #2
Your best two options are:
Vista Home Premium
Vista Ultimate

I would say Vista Premium will satisfy most peoples needs.
Bob Cerelli's Avatar
Distinguished Member with 22,837 posts.
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
19-Feb-2008, 12:24 AM #3
Good think MS posts they will support XP up until 2014. Figure I'll have all new computers by then anyway.
jmwills's Avatar
jmwills jmwills is offline   jmwills has a birthday soon!
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 3,046 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Experience: Learning More Everyday!!
19-Feb-2008, 04:15 AM #4
Agreed that Premium will suffice for the vast majority of all home users.
jonmcc33's Avatar
Computer Specs
Account Disabled with 837 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Experience: CompTIA A+, CCNA, MCSE
19-Feb-2008, 07:16 AM #5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferendon View Post
Currently running Win2K Pro, and quite happy. I see the end of 2000-compatibility very near. Don't wanna spend the cash on something that's gonna be on it's way out soon (like XP), so I might as well get on board with the next big thing. All of my hardware is DX10 ready, so I wanna get Vista. What's the best version for someone who has always had the "Pro" version of everything.
Good idea on not paying for something that is 7 years old and not so secure.

The Pro version of Vista would be Business. IMO, the step up to Business is well worth the small price premium ($30 difference).

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16832116207
jmwills's Avatar
jmwills jmwills is offline   jmwills has a birthday soon!
Computer Specs
Distinguished Member with 3,046 posts.
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Experience: Learning More Everyday!!
19-Feb-2008, 07:29 AM #6
What do you need in Business that you cannot get in Premium? I know the difference, does the OP?
jonmcc33's Avatar
Computer Specs
Account Disabled with 837 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Experience: CompTIA A+, CCNA, MCSE
19-Feb-2008, 07:40 AM #7
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmwills View Post
What do you need in Business that you cannot get in Premium? I know the difference, does the OP?
Look at what Home Premium is missing...

http://www.realtime-vista.com/genera...hat_is_the.htm

Microsoft even states that the upgrade path from Windows XP Pro should be Windows Vista Business.
Ferendon's Avatar
Senior Member with 151 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Fort Worth
19-Feb-2008, 09:18 AM #8
Yeah, Home Basic and Premium are both out. I think Business is the best route for me. Especially, seeing as how I can get an OE copy, for a lot less than a boxed version.
crjdriver's Avatar
Computer Specs
Moderator with 17,165 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Reno, NV
19-Feb-2008, 10:27 AM #9
As long as you are not going to join a domain, use encryption, need group policy editor, or use multiple cpus [NOT dual core, multiple cpu] Then home premium should be fine. If you do intend to do any of those things, then go business.

I agree it is a sad day when win2k support for new hardware is gone. There are no win2k drivers for my video card [ati 3850]
__________________
Microsoft MVP Desktop Experience
Ferendon's Avatar
Senior Member with 151 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Fort Worth
20-Feb-2008, 12:39 AM #10
There are no Win2k drivers for my 8600GT either. Fortunately, I just installed Vista Business. I'm getting Crysis tomorrow. I'm also downloading all of my Steam games again, so that I can see DX10 is all of it's supposed glory.

Oh, and transferring 19GB from a UDMA 100 drive, to a SATAII/300 drive, takes FOREVER.
__________________
abit Fatal1ty FP-IN9 SLi
C2Q Q6600
4 Gigs Corsair PC6400 Dual Channel
eVGA nVidia 8600GT 512MB
Maxtor 500GB SATAII/300
Pioneer 16x8x16 DVD+-RW
CoolerMaster 500w
Windows Vista Business
jonmcc33's Avatar
Computer Specs
Account Disabled with 837 posts.
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Experience: CompTIA A+, CCNA, MCSE
20-Feb-2008, 01:00 AM #11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferendon View Post
There are no Win2k drivers for my 8600GT either. Fortunately, I just installed Vista Business. I'm getting Crysis tomorrow. I'm also downloading all of my Steam games again, so that I can see DX10 is all of it's supposed glory.

Oh, and transferring 19GB from a UDMA 100 drive, to a SATAII/300 drive, takes FOREVER.
It shouldn't take long at all unless those are 19GB of small files. Vista pre-SP1 takes a long time with a mass amount of small files. That was one of the huge improvements with SP1, it improved file transfer speed.
Ferendon's Avatar
Senior Member with 151 posts.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Fort Worth
20-Feb-2008, 09:30 AM #12
They were mp3s, and there were a few thousand of them.
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

You Are Using:
Server ID
Advertisements do not imply our endorsement of that product or service.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:44 AM.
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 TechGuy, Inc. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Powered by Cermak Technologies, Inc.