Advertisement

There's no such thing as a stupid question, but they're the easiest to answer.
Login
Search

Advertisement

Windows Vista Windows Vista
Search Search
Search for:
Tech Support Guy > > >

What would cause my graphics subscore to decrease?


(!)

hewwo2u2's Avatar
hewwo2u2 hewwo2u2 is offline
Computer Specs
Member with 325 posts.
THREAD STARTER
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SC
Experience: Beginner
08-Sep-2009, 01:23 AM #1
What would cause my graphics subscore to decrease?
I recently installed new RAM so, naturally I ran the Windows performance rating to see how much of a difference it would make. The Memory (RAM) increased as expected (from 3.9 to 5.1) but to my dismay, I noticed that both my Graphics (desktop performance for Windows Aero) and my Gaming graphics (3D business and gaming graphics performance) decreased from 2.7 to 2.4, and from 3.1 to 3.0 respectively. This has lowered my Windows Experience Index to a 2.4. Does anyone know what would cause this?
hewwo2u2's Avatar
hewwo2u2 hewwo2u2 is offline
Computer Specs
Member with 325 posts.
THREAD STARTER
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SC
Experience: Beginner
08-Sep-2009, 01:35 AM #2
My computer is using ATI Raedon Xpress 1150 Graphics. I manually updated the driver myself about a month ago to version 8.591.0.0 which was released in Feb, 2009. Recently, I got a Windows update stating that there was an update for the driver, but when I clicked for the information, it said that the driver was released in Dec. 2006. But just in case my recent update was the reason for the lowered rating, I went to device manager and clicked on "update driver" to see if it would find a newer one. It did find and install a new driver, but when I checked it it was version 8.331.00 (released in Dec. 2006-definitely an older driver than the one I installed myself). I refreshed the Windows performance rating, and everything stayed the same.

So I rolled back to the previous (and oddly the newer) driver and refreshed my rating and the Graphics component went up from 2.4 to 2.5. But both are still lower than they were. what gives?
aka Brett's Avatar
Account Disabled with 16,918 posts.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
09-Sep-2009, 02:14 AM #3
I think your ram is clocking down the the next lowest speed.
This can happen from mis matched sticks,
Some moboards just do it even with matched ram.
hewwo2u2's Avatar
hewwo2u2 hewwo2u2 is offline
Computer Specs
Member with 325 posts.
THREAD STARTER
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SC
Experience: Beginner
10-Sep-2009, 01:04 AM #4
my RAM is the ones that CRUCIAL said goes into my specific computer so I don't think they are mismatched...

So the RAM can cause the graphics to be less quality? Is there anything I should do about this?
aka Brett's Avatar
Account Disabled with 16,918 posts.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
10-Sep-2009, 01:29 AM #5
For instance I had a pc that used pc2700
If i had a gig or less in it it would run at the correct speed if I installed more than a gig..then it would run at pc 2100.

Although I had more ram it lowered my aquamark video score.
also it increased my time doing superpi benchmarks.

go here and install this
http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php
hewwo2u2's Avatar
hewwo2u2 hewwo2u2 is offline
Computer Specs
Member with 325 posts.
THREAD STARTER
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SC
Experience: Beginner
12-Sep-2009, 08:00 PM #6
does this change the functionality of my computer? Should I remove the extra RAM? Is does the good out weigh the bad here?
aka Brett's Avatar
Account Disabled with 16,918 posts.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
12-Sep-2009, 09:07 PM #7
it is just to see what your ram is running at it doesnt change anything
hewwo2u2's Avatar
hewwo2u2 hewwo2u2 is offline
Computer Specs
Member with 325 posts.
THREAD STARTER
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SC
Experience: Beginner
14-Sep-2009, 03:04 AM #8
huh?

I'm talking about the lower graphics ratings...
aka Brett's Avatar
Account Disabled with 16,918 posts.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
14-Sep-2009, 03:26 AM #9
yes
lower ram speed can lower some graphic scores.
It happened to me with aquamark as explained in post 5.
When I put in more ram it read it but rather than run at pc2700 it ran at pc2100 and lowered my aquamark score
The little tool I gave you the link for will tell you what your ram is running while booted into windows
hewwo2u2's Avatar
hewwo2u2 hewwo2u2 is offline
Computer Specs
Member with 325 posts.
THREAD STARTER
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SC
Experience: Beginner
15-Sep-2009, 10:19 PM #10
that's fine, I just wanted to know if the lower graphics is something I should worry about. or is it better to have more RAM and less graphics than to have less RAM?
aka Brett's Avatar
Account Disabled with 16,918 posts.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
16-Sep-2009, 01:14 AM #11
I would take the ram myself...overall the machine will be more responsive
As Seen On

BBC, Reader's Digest, PC Magazine, Today Show, Money Magazine
WELCOME TO TECH SUPPORT GUY!

Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question. This site is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations.

If you're not already familiar with forums, watch our Welcome Guide to get started.


Tags
base score, graphics, rating, subscore, windows experience index

(clock)
THIS THREAD HAS EXPIRED.
Are you having the same problem? We have volunteers ready to answer your question, but first you'll have to join for free. Need help getting started? Check out our Welcome Guide.

Search Tech Support Guy

Find the solution to your
computer problem!




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


WELCOME
You Are Using: Server ID
Trusted Website Back to the Top ↑